Carbon dioxide flux and net primary production of a boreal treed bog: Responses to warming and water-table-lowering simulations of climate change
Midlatitude treed bogs represent significant carbon (C) stocks and are highly sensitive to global climate change. In a dry continental treed bog, we compared three sites: control, recent (1–3 years; experimental) and older drained (10–13 years), with water levels at 38, 74 and 120 cm below the surfa...
Saved in:
Published in: | Biogeosciences Vol. 12; no. 4; pp. 1091 - 1111 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Katlenburg-Lindau
Copernicus GmbH
20-02-2015
Copernicus Publications |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Abstract | Midlatitude treed bogs represent significant carbon (C) stocks and are highly sensitive to global climate change. In a dry continental treed bog, we compared three sites: control, recent (1–3 years; experimental) and older drained (10–13 years), with water levels at 38, 74 and 120 cm below the surface, respectively. At each site we measured carbon dioxide (CO2) fluxes and estimated tree root respiration (Rr; across hummock–hollow microtopography of the forest floor) and net primary production (NPP) of trees during the growing seasons (May to October) of 2011–2013. The CO2–C balance was calculated by adding the net CO2 exchange of the forest floor (NEff-Rr) to the NPP of the trees. From cooler and wetter 2011 to the driest and the warmest 2013, the control site was a CO2–C sink of 92, 70 and 76 g m−2, the experimental site was a CO2–C source of 14, 57 and 135 g m−2, and the drained site was a progressively smaller source of 26, 23 and 13 g CO2–C m−2. The short-term drainage at the experimental site resulted in small changes in vegetation coverage and large net CO2 emissions at the microforms. In contrast, the longer-term drainage and deeper water level at the drained site resulted in the replacement of mosses with vascular plants (shrubs) on the hummocks and lichen in the hollows leading to the highest CO2 uptake at the drained hummocks and significant losses in the hollows. The tree NPP (including above- and below-ground growth and litter fall) in 2011 and 2012 was significantly higher at the drained site (92 and 83 g C m−2) than at the experimental (58 and 55 g C m−2) and control (52 and 46 g C m−2) sites. We also quantified the impact of climatic warming at all water table treatments by equipping additional plots with open-top chambers (OTCs) that caused a passive warming on average of ~ 1 °C and differential air warming of ~ 6 °C at midday full sun over the study years. Warming significantly enhanced shrub growth and the CO2 sink function of the drained hummocks (exceeding the cumulative respiration losses in hollows induced by the lowered water level × warming). There was an interaction of water level with warming across hummocks that resulted in the largest net CO2 uptake at the warmed drained hummocks. Thus in 2013, the warming treatment enhanced the sink function of the control site by 13 g m−2, reduced the source function of the experimental by 10 g m−2 and significantly enhanced the sink function of the drained site by 73 g m−2. Therefore, drying and warming in continental bogs is expected to initially accelerate CO2–C losses via ecosystem respiration, but persistent drought and warming is expected to restore the peatland's original CO2–C sink function as a result of the shifts in vegetation composition and productivity between the microforms and increased NPP of trees over time. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Midlatitude treed bogs represent significant carbon (C) stocks and are highly sensitive to global climate change. In a dry continental treed bog, we compared three sites: control, recent (1-3 years; experimental) and older drained (10-13 years), with water levels at 38, 74 and 120 cm below the surface, respectively. At each site we measured carbon dioxide (CO2) fluxes and estimated tree root respiration (Rr; across hummock-hollow microtopography of the forest floor) and net primary production (NPP) of trees during the growing seasons (May to October) of 2011-2013. The CO2-C balance was calculated by adding the net CO2 exchange of the forest floor (NEff-Rr) to the NPP of the trees. From cooler and wetter 2011 to the driest and the warmest 2013, the control site was a CO2-C sink of 92, 70 and 76 g m-2, the experimental site was a CO2-C source of 14, 57 and 135 g m-2, and the drained site was a progressively smaller source of 26, 23 and 13 g CO2-C m-2. The short-term drainage at the experimental site resulted in small changes in vegetation coverage and large net CO2 emissions at the microforms. In contrast, the longer-term drainage and deeper water level at the drained site resulted in the replacement of mosses with vascular plants (shrubs) on the hummocks and lichen in the hollows leading to the highest CO2 uptake at the drained hummocks and significant losses in the hollows. The tree NPP (including above- and below-ground growth and litter fall) in 2011 and 2012 was significantly higher at the drained site (92 and 83 g C m-2) than at the experimental (58 and 55 g C m-2) and control (52 and 46 g C m-2) sites. We also quantified the impact of climatic warming at all water table treatments by equipping additional plots with open-top chambers (OTCs) that caused a passive warming on average of 1 degree C and differential air warming of 6 degree C at midday full sun over the study years. Warming significantly enhanced shrub growth and the CO2 sink function of the drained hummocks (exceeding the cumulative respiration losses in hollows induced by the lowered water level warming). There was an interaction of water level with warming across hummocks that resulted in the largest net CO2 uptake at the warmed drained hummocks. Thus in 2013, the warming treatment enhanced the sink function of the control site by 13 g m-2, reduced the source function of the experimental by 10 g m-2 and significantly enhanced the sink function of the drained site by 73 g m-2. Therefore, drying and warming in continental bogs is expected to initially accelerate CO2-C losses via ecosystem respiration, but persistent drought and warming is expected to restore the peatland's original CO2-C sink function as a result of the shifts in vegetation composition and productivity between the microforms and increased NPP of trees over time. Midlatitude treed bogs represent significant carbon (C) stocks and are highly sensitive to global climate change. In a dry continental treed bog, we compared three sites: control, recent (1–3 years; experimental) and older drained (10–13 years), with water levels at 38, 74 and 120 cm below the surface, respectively. At each site we measured carbon dioxide (CO2) fluxes and estimated tree root respiration (Rr; across hummock–hollow microtopography of the forest floor) and net primary production (NPP) of trees during the growing seasons (May to October) of 2011–2013. The CO2–C balance was calculated by adding the net CO2 exchange of the forest floor (NEff-Rr) to the NPP of the trees. From cooler and wetter 2011 to the driest and the warmest 2013, the control site was a CO2–C sink of 92, 70 and 76 g m−2, the experimental site was a CO2–C source of 14, 57 and 135 g m−2, and the drained site was a progressively smaller source of 26, 23 and 13 g CO2–C m−2. The short-term drainage at the experimental site resulted in small changes in vegetation coverage and large net CO2 emissions at the microforms. In contrast, the longer-term drainage and deeper water level at the drained site resulted in the replacement of mosses with vascular plants (shrubs) on the hummocks and lichen in the hollows leading to the highest CO2 uptake at the drained hummocks and significant losses in the hollows. The tree NPP (including above- and below-ground growth and litter fall) in 2011 and 2012 was significantly higher at the drained site (92 and 83 g C m−2) than at the experimental (58 and 55 g C m−2) and control (52 and 46 g C m−2) sites. We also quantified the impact of climatic warming at all water table treatments by equipping additional plots with open-top chambers (OTCs) that caused a passive warming on average of ~ 1 °C and differential air warming of ~ 6 °C at midday full sun over the study years. Warming significantly enhanced shrub growth and the CO2 sink function of the drained hummocks (exceeding the cumulative respiration losses in hollows induced by the lowered water level × warming). There was an interaction of water level with warming across hummocks that resulted in the largest net CO2 uptake at the warmed drained hummocks. Thus in 2013, the warming treatment enhanced the sink function of the control site by 13 g m−2, reduced the source function of the experimental by 10 g m−2 and significantly enhanced the sink function of the drained site by 73 g m−2. Therefore, drying and warming in continental bogs is expected to initially accelerate CO2–C losses via ecosystem respiration, but persistent drought and warming is expected to restore the peatland's original CO2–C sink function as a result of the shifts in vegetation composition and productivity between the microforms and increased NPP of trees over time. Midlatitude treed bogs represent significant carbon (C) stocks and are highly sensitive to global climate change. In a dry continental treed bog, we compared three sites: control, recent (1-3 years; experimental) and older drained (10-13 years), with water levels at 38, 74 and 120 cm below the surface, respectively. At each site we measured carbon dioxide (CO.sub.2) fluxes and estimated tree root respiration (R.sub.r ; across hummock-hollow microtopography of the forest floor) and net primary production (NPP) of trees during the growing seasons (May to October) of 2011-2013. The CO.sub.2 -C balance was calculated by adding the net CO.sub.2 exchange of the forest floor (NE.sub.ff -R.sub.r) to the NPP of the trees. From cooler and wetter 2011 to the driest and the warmest 2013, the control site was a CO.sub.2 -C sink of 92, 70 and 76 g m.sup.-2, the experimental site was a CO.sub.2 -C source of 14, 57 and 135 g m.sup.-2, and the drained site was a progressively smaller source of 26, 23 and 13 g CO.sub.2 -C m.sup.-2 . The short-term drainage at the experimental site resulted in small changes in vegetation coverage and large net CO.sub.2 emissions at the microforms. In contrast, the longer-term drainage and deeper water level at the drained site resulted in the replacement of mosses with vascular plants (shrubs) on the hummocks and lichen in the hollows leading to the highest CO.sub.2 uptake at the drained hummocks and significant losses in the hollows. The tree NPP (including above- and below-ground growth and litter fall) in 2011 and 2012 was significantly higher at the drained site (92 and 83 g C m.sup.-2) than at the experimental (58 and 55 g C m.sup.-2) and control (52 and 46 g C m.sup.-2) sites. We also quantified the impact of climatic warming at all water table treatments by equipping additional plots with open-top chambers (OTCs) that caused a passive warming on average of ~ 1 °C and differential air warming of ~ 6 °C at midday full sun over the study years. Warming significantly enhanced shrub growth and the CO.sub.2 sink function of the drained hummocks (exceeding the cumulative respiration losses in hollows induced by the lowered water level à warming). There was an interaction of water level with warming across hummocks that resulted in the largest net CO.sub.2 uptake at the warmed drained hummocks. Thus in 2013, the warming treatment enhanced the sink function of the control site by 13 g m.sup.-2, reduced the source function of the experimental by 10 g m.sup.-2 and significantly enhanced the sink function of the drained site by 73 g m.sup.-2 . Therefore, drying and warming in continental bogs is expected to initially accelerate CO.sub.2 -C losses via ecosystem respiration, but persistent drought and warming is expected to restore the peatland's original CO.sub.2 -C sink function as a result of the shifts in vegetation composition and productivity between the microforms and increased NPP of trees over time. Midlatitude treed bogs represent significant carbon (C) stocks and are highly sensitive to global climate change. In a dry continental treed bog, we compared three sites: control, recent (1-3 years; experimental) and older drained (10-13 years), with water levels at 38, 74 and 120 cm below the surface, respectively. At each site we measured carbon dioxide (CO2) fluxes and estimated tree root respiration (Rr; across hummock-hollow microtopography of the forest floor) and net primary production (NPP) of trees during the growing seasons (May to October) of 2011-2013. The CO2-C balance was calculated by adding the net CO2 exchange of the forest floor (NEff-Rr) to the NPP of the trees. From cooler and wetter 2011 to the driest and the warmest 2013, the control site was a CO2-C sink of 92, 70 and 76 g m-2, the experimental site was a CO2-C source of 14, 57 and 135 g m-2, and the drained site was a progressively smaller source of 26, 23 and 13 g CO2-C m-2. The short-term drainage at the experimental site resulted in small changes in vegetation coverage and large net CO2 emissions at the microforms. In contrast, the longer-term drainage and deeper water level at the drained site resulted in the replacement of mosses with vascular plants (shrubs) on the hummocks and lichen in the hollows leading to the highest CO2 uptake at the drained hummocks and significant losses in the hollows. The tree NPP (including above- and below-ground growth and litter fall) in 2011 and 2012 was significantly higher at the drained site (92 and 83 g C m-2) than at the experimental (58 and 55 g C m-2) and control (52 and 46 g C m-2) sites. We also quantified the impact of climatic warming at all water table treatments by equipping additional plots with open-top chambers (OTCs) that caused a passive warming on average of ~ 1 °C and differential air warming of ~ 6 °C at midday full sun over the study years. Warming significantly enhanced shrub growth and the CO2 sink function of the drained hummocks (exceeding the cumulative respiration losses in hollows induced by the lowered water level × warming). There was an interaction of water level with warming across hummocks that resulted in the largest net CO2 uptake at the warmed drained hummocks. Thus in 2013, the warming treatment enhanced the sink function of the control site by 13 g m-2, reduced the source function of the experimental by 10 g m-2 and significantly enhanced the sink function of the drained site by 73 g m-2. Therefore, drying and warming in continental bogs is expected to initially accelerate CO2-C losses via ecosystem respiration, but persistent drought and warming is expected to restore the peatland's original CO2-C sink function as a result of the shifts in vegetation composition and productivity between the microforms and increased NPP of trees over time. |
Audience | Academic |
Author | Munir, T. M Strack, M Perkins, M Kaing, E |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 fullname: Munir, T. M – sequence: 2 fullname: Perkins, M – sequence: 3 fullname: Kaing, E – sequence: 4 fullname: Strack, M |
BookMark | eNptkk1v1DAQhiNUJNrCmaslLnBI6484iblVKz5WqoRU4GyN40nwKomL7WiXn8E_xulWwCLkw9jjZ97RjN6L4mz2MxbFS0avJFPVtRlKxktGFSs5ZfJJcc4aXpcVa9XZX_dnxUWMO0pFS1t5XvzcQDB-Jtb5g7NI-nE5EJgtmTGR--AmCD9y9Hbpksuc7wkQ4wPCSFJAtPkxvCV3GO_9HDGS5MkewuTm4UFmDwlDmcCMWI5-j2H9iG5aRlj14irYjblNQtJ9g3nA58XTHsaILx7jZfH1_bsvm4_l7acP283NbdlJRlPZ90LUjFMKTAjKhW3AUtoYI2spe2HyJ1RKATW1VLWStm-somBl3g21VS0ui-1R13rY6cdRtQenHxI-DBpCct2IWrDaCpm3zK2qOIBBajgTsq4aoZquzVqvj1p5U98XjElPLnY4jjCjX6Jmdd1yqSinGX31D7rzS5jzpCsllGibRv6hBsj93dz7FKBbRfVN1bKKi4rxTF39h8rH4uS6bI_e5fxJwZuTgswkPKQBlhj19vPdKXt9ZLvgYwzY_94Ro3p1nDaDZlyvjtOr48QvSK3HrQ |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_3390_f8030075 crossref_primary_10_5194_bg_18_4817_2021 crossref_primary_10_3390_f11050594 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jhydrol_2018_05_041 crossref_primary_10_3390_agriculture9070153 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10021_016_0092_x crossref_primary_10_3389_feart_2021_650662 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_soilbio_2024_109346 crossref_primary_10_5194_bg_17_5693_2020 crossref_primary_10_1029_2021EF002630 crossref_primary_10_1111_1365_2435_13883 crossref_primary_10_3390_soilsystems6040077 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ecoleng_2017_05_011 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_geoderma_2016_03_011 crossref_primary_10_1029_2018JG004486 crossref_primary_10_1029_2018MS001574 crossref_primary_10_1007_s13157_022_01546_6 crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_4017537 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11273_020_09715_2 crossref_primary_10_2134_jeq2019_04_0163 crossref_primary_10_3389_fpls_2017_00249 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2015_11_149 crossref_primary_10_1111_jvs_12794 crossref_primary_10_1088_2752_5295_acc67e crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2019_134613 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11273_021_09784_x crossref_primary_10_1080_07011784_2023_2269137 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10021_017_0213_1 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11104_022_05561_8 crossref_primary_10_1080_01904167_2020_1727509 crossref_primary_10_1002_eco_1893 crossref_primary_10_1515_opag_2020_0023 crossref_primary_10_1002_eco_2100 crossref_primary_10_1639_0007_2745_118_4_412 crossref_primary_10_3390_agronomy9070343 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11356_022_18745_7 crossref_primary_10_1590_0102_33062018abb0095 crossref_primary_10_1073_pnas_2101742118 crossref_primary_10_1029_2020AV000163 crossref_primary_10_1088_1748_9326_acc194 crossref_primary_10_1111_1365_2435_12891 crossref_primary_10_1111_gcb_15753 crossref_primary_10_1002_ece3_5068 crossref_primary_10_5194_bg_15_3937_2018 crossref_primary_10_1111_nph_15629 crossref_primary_10_1002_ecm_1371 crossref_primary_10_1126_sciadv_aav1131 crossref_primary_10_3390_plants10102057 crossref_primary_10_7717_peerj_8530 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_022_23548_4 crossref_primary_10_3389_feart_2021_631368 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11676_019_00963_4 crossref_primary_10_1111_gcb_14140 crossref_primary_10_3390_soilsystems5020035 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2018_11_151 crossref_primary_10_1111_gcb_13844 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10533_020_00707_1 crossref_primary_10_3389_feart_2020_557943 crossref_primary_10_1080_20964129_2020_1806113 crossref_primary_10_1007_s42974_024_00198_2 crossref_primary_10_1111_gcb_14617 crossref_primary_10_3390_su131910874 crossref_primary_10_3390_su10093288 crossref_primary_10_1029_2022JG007206 crossref_primary_10_1007_s13157_023_01692_5 crossref_primary_10_1111_gcb_14057 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10021_021_00736_3 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2020_144071 |
Cites_doi | 10.1038/ngeo331 10.1080/02723646.2000.10642719 10.1007/978-94-007-4159-1_10 10.1029/2008GB003327 10.1139/x93-177 10.5194/bg-9-3305-2012 10.1139/b87-111 10.1139/x02-165 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01247.x 10.1023/A:1009812024996 10.1038/25119 10.1139/x84-085 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2006.03.012 10.1111/j.1600-0889.2007.00309.x 10.1007/s10021-009-9228-6 10.1139/x90-133 10.1007/s10021-014-9795-z 10.1080/02827580500281975 10.5194/bg-4-1005-2007 10.7202/004838ar 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01756.x 10.1046/j.1365-2486.2000.00363.x 10.2307/2530695 10.1029/2002GB001946 10.5194/bg-11-807-2014 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2007.01529.x 10.1016/0038-0717(93)90234-3 10.1046/j.1365-2486.2001.00412.x 10.4319/lo.2007.52.1.0096 10.1017/S0376892902000024 10.2307/3547057 10.1016/j.agrformet.2008.11.007 10.1046/j.1365-2486.2003.00571.x 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2009.02089.x 10.1029/2005JG000145 10.1007/BF03161336 10.1111/j.1365-2389.2012.01499.x 10.1016/S0168-1923(02)00100-4 10.1046/j.1365-2486.2002.00521.x 10.1016/j.agrformet.2006.03.022 10.1007/978-3-662-03125-4 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2007.06.042 10.1029/2010JG001507 10.1007/s10021-013-9646-3 10.5194/bg-10-929-2013 10.5194/bg-8-3203-2011 10.1007/s10021-007-9046-7 10.1890/0012-9658(2000)081[3464:ROBAFP]2.0.CO;2 10.1672/0277-5212(2004)024[0357:AAOTCT]2.0.CO;2 10.1029/2001GL014000 10.5194/bg-5-1475-2008 10.1890/0012-9658(1999)080[0161:CBOABB]2.0.CO;2 10.1890/09-0135.1 10.1007/s10021-009-9292-y 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.02104.x 10.1139/b11-068 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01292.x 10.1038/nclimate1864 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.02357.x 10.5194/bg-9-4071-2012 10.1093/treephys/tpq002 10.1046/j.0022-0477.2001.00633.x 10.1023/A:1006244819642 10.1007/s10021-007-9107-y 10.1038/nature04514 10.1017/CBO9781107415324.015 10.1093/treephys/13.1.1 10.1029/2010JG001512 10.1139/x92-004 10.5194/bg-7-1715-2010 10.1007/s004420100691 10.5194/bg-9-2737-2012 10.1029/2008GM000829 10.1046/j.1365-2486.2000.00283.x 10.1046/j.1365-2389.2001.00415.x 10.1016/j.soilbio.2006.02.017 10.1007/s10342-008-0204-z 10.1080/11956860.1997.11682416 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | COPYRIGHT 2015 Copernicus GmbH Copyright Copernicus GmbH 2015 |
Copyright_xml | – notice: COPYRIGHT 2015 Copernicus GmbH – notice: Copyright Copernicus GmbH 2015 |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION ISR 7QO 7SN 7TG 7TN 7UA 8FD 8FE 8FG 8FH ABJCF ABUWG AFKRA ATCPS AZQEC BBNVY BENPR BFMQW BGLVJ BHPHI BKSAR C1K CCPQU DWQXO F1W FR3 GNUQQ H95 H96 HCIFZ KL. L.G L6V LK8 M7N M7P M7S P64 PATMY PCBAR PIMPY PQEST PQQKQ PQUKI PRINS PTHSS PYCSY 7QH 7ST 7U6 SOI DOA |
DOI | 10.5194/bg-12-1091-2015 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef Science in Context Biotechnology Research Abstracts Ecology Abstracts Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts Oceanic Abstracts Water Resources Abstracts Technology Research Database ProQuest SciTech Collection ProQuest Technology Collection ProQuest Natural Science Collection Materials Science & Engineering Collection ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest Central Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection ProQuest Central Essentials Biological Science Collection ProQuest Central Continental Europe Database Technology Collection Natural Science Collection Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management ProQuest One Community College ProQuest Central Korea ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts Engineering Research Database ProQuest Central Student Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources SciTech Premium Collection Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional ProQuest Engineering Collection ProQuest Biological Science Collection Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C) Biological Science Database Engineering Database Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts Environmental Science Database Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest Central China Engineering Collection Environmental Science Collection Aqualine Environment Abstracts Sustainability Science Abstracts Environment Abstracts Directory of Open Access Journals |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef Publicly Available Content Database Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional ProQuest Central Student Technology Collection Technology Research Database ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) SciTech Premium Collection ProQuest One Community College ProQuest Natural Science Collection ProQuest Central China Water Resources Abstracts Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection ProQuest Central ProQuest Engineering Collection Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts Biotechnology Research Abstracts Oceanic Abstracts Natural Science Collection ProQuest Central Korea Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C) Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection Biological Science Collection Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources Engineering Collection Engineering Database ProQuest Biological Science Collection ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database ProQuest Technology Collection Continental Europe Database Biological Science Database ProQuest SciTech Collection Ecology Abstracts Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts Environmental Science Collection Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts Materials Science & Engineering Collection Environmental Science Database Engineering Research Database ProQuest One Academic Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic Sustainability Science Abstracts Aqualine Environment Abstracts |
DatabaseTitleList | Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional CrossRef Publicly Available Content Database |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: DOA name: Directory of Open Access Journals url: http://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Biology |
EISSN | 1726-4189 |
EndPage | 1111 |
ExternalDocumentID | oai_doaj_org_article_316d355192d942aabe0b2135647397c8 3626352401 A481423412 10_5194_bg_12_1091_2015 |
GroupedDBID | 23N 2WC 2XV 3V. 4P2 5GY 5VS 7XC 8FE 8FG 8FH 8R4 8R5 AAFWJ AAYXX ABJCF ABUWG ADBBV AENEX AFKRA AFPKN AHGZY ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ATCPS BBNVY BBORY BCNDV BENPR BFMQW BGLVJ BHPHI BKSAR BPHCQ CCPQU CITATION E3Z EBD EBS EDH EJD GROUPED_DOAJ H13 HCIFZ HH5 IAO IEA IPNFZ ISR ITC KQ8 L6V L8X LK5 LK8 M7P M7R M7S MM- M~E OK1 P2P PATMY PCBAR PIMPY PQQKQ PROAC PTHSS PYCSY Q2X RIG RKB RNS TR2 XSB ~02 7QO 7SN 7TG 7TN 7UA 8FD AZQEC C1K DWQXO F1W FR3 GNUQQ H95 H96 KL. L.G M7N P64 PQEST PQUKI PRINS 7QH 7ST 7U6 SOI |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c510t-ff3361200a133023d7ad007bb5655f3b361a499a0b659695df7d90ad50150d463 |
IEDL.DBID | DOA |
ISSN | 1726-4189 1726-4170 |
IngestDate | Tue Oct 22 15:14:43 EDT 2024 Fri Oct 25 04:39:03 EDT 2024 Thu Oct 10 17:13:40 EDT 2024 Tue Nov 19 21:00:51 EST 2024 Tue Nov 12 22:49:48 EST 2024 Thu Aug 01 20:11:37 EDT 2024 Fri Aug 23 03:00:33 EDT 2024 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 4 |
Language | English |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c510t-ff3361200a133023d7ad007bb5655f3b361a499a0b659695df7d90ad50150d463 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ORCID | 0000-0001-6767-2707 0000-0002-8996-7271 |
OpenAccessLink | https://doaj.org/article/316d355192d942aabe0b2135647397c8 |
PQID | 1663938775 |
PQPubID | 105740 |
PageCount | 21 |
ParticipantIDs | doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_316d355192d942aabe0b2135647397c8 proquest_miscellaneous_1668259020 proquest_journals_1663938775 gale_infotracmisc_A481423412 gale_infotracacademiconefile_A481423412 gale_incontextgauss_ISR_A481423412 crossref_primary_10_5194_bg_12_1091_2015 |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2015-02-20 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2015-02-20 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 02 year: 2015 text: 2015-02-20 day: 20 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationPlace | Katlenburg-Lindau |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Katlenburg-Lindau |
PublicationTitle | Biogeosciences |
PublicationYear | 2015 |
Publisher | Copernicus GmbH Copernicus Publications |
Publisher_xml | – name: Copernicus GmbH – name: Copernicus Publications |
References | ref13 ref57 ref12 ref56 ref15 ref59 ref14 ref58 ref53 ref52 ref11 ref55 ref10 ref54 ref17 ref16 ref19 ref18 ref51 ref50 ref46 ref45 ref48 ref47 ref42 ref86 ref41 ref85 ref44 ref43 ref87 ref49 ref8 ref7 ref9 ref4 ref3 ref6 ref5 ref82 ref81 ref40 ref84 ref83 ref80 ref35 ref79 ref34 ref78 ref37 ref36 ref31 ref75 ref30 ref74 ref33 ref77 ref32 ref76 ref2 ref1 ref39 ref38 ref71 ref70 ref73 ref72 ref24 ref68 ref23 ref67 ref26 ref25 ref69 ref20 ref64 ref63 ref22 ref66 ref21 ref65 ref28 ref27 ref29 ref60 ref62 ref61 |
References_xml | – ident: ref29 doi: 10.1038/ngeo331 – ident: ref80 doi: 10.1080/02723646.2000.10642719 – ident: ref5 doi: 10.1007/978-94-007-4159-1_10 – ident: ref73 doi: 10.1029/2008GB003327 – ident: ref7 doi: 10.1139/x93-177 – ident: ref38 doi: 10.5194/bg-9-3305-2012 – ident: ref20 – ident: ref42 doi: 10.1139/b87-111 – ident: ref41 doi: 10.1139/x02-165 – ident: ref52 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01247.x – ident: ref66 doi: 10.1023/A:1009812024996 – ident: ref6 doi: 10.1038/25119 – ident: ref18 doi: 10.1139/x84-085 – ident: ref72 doi: 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2006.03.012 – ident: ref3 doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0889.2007.00309.x – ident: ref78 doi: 10.1007/s10021-009-9228-6 – ident: ref48 doi: 10.1139/x90-133 – ident: ref17 – ident: ref54 doi: 10.1007/s10021-014-9795-z – ident: ref79 doi: 10.1080/02827580500281975 – ident: ref36 doi: 10.5194/bg-4-1005-2007 – ident: ref61 – ident: ref35 doi: 10.7202/004838ar – ident: ref86 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01756.x – ident: ref25 doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2486.2000.00363.x – ident: ref31 doi: 10.2307/2530695 – ident: ref8 doi: 10.1029/2002GB001946 – ident: ref55 doi: 10.5194/bg-11-807-2014 – ident: ref37 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2007.01529.x – ident: ref27 doi: 10.1016/0038-0717(93)90234-3 – ident: ref30 doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2486.2001.00412.x – ident: ref34 doi: 10.4319/lo.2007.52.1.0096 – ident: ref50 doi: 10.1017/S0376892902000024 – ident: ref13 doi: 10.2307/3547057 – ident: ref58 doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2008.11.007 – ident: ref85 doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2486.2003.00571.x – ident: ref23 – ident: ref9 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2009.02089.x – ident: ref68 doi: 10.1029/2005JG000145 – ident: ref71 doi: 10.1007/BF03161336 – ident: ref65 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2389.2012.01499.x – ident: ref14 doi: 10.1016/S0168-1923(02)00100-4 – ident: ref60 doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2486.2002.00521.x – ident: ref70 doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2006.03.022 – ident: ref16 – ident: ref57 doi: 10.1007/978-3-662-03125-4 – ident: ref75 doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2007.06.042 – ident: ref19 doi: 10.1029/2010JG001507 – ident: ref32 doi: 10.1007/s10021-013-9646-3 – ident: ref10 doi: 10.5194/bg-10-929-2013 – ident: ref45 doi: 10.5194/bg-8-3203-2011 – ident: ref62 doi: 10.1007/s10021-007-9046-7 – ident: ref64 – ident: ref83 doi: 10.1890/0012-9658(2000)081[3464:ROBAFP]2.0.CO;2 – ident: ref44 doi: 10.1672/0277-5212(2004)024[0357:AAOTCT]2.0.CO;2 – ident: ref76 doi: 10.1029/2001GL014000 – ident: ref43 doi: 10.5194/bg-5-1475-2008 – ident: ref2 doi: 10.1890/0012-9658(1999)080[0161:CBOABB]2.0.CO;2 – ident: ref33 doi: 10.1890/09-0135.1 – ident: ref11 doi: 10.1007/s10021-009-9292-y – ident: ref47 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.02104.x – ident: ref40 doi: 10.1139/b11-068 – ident: ref63 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01292.x – ident: ref67 doi: 10.1038/nclimate1864 – ident: ref56 doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.02357.x – ident: ref87 doi: 10.5194/bg-9-4071-2012 – ident: ref24 doi: 10.1093/treephys/tpq002 – ident: ref51 doi: 10.1046/j.0022-0477.2001.00633.x – ident: ref22 doi: 10.1023/A:1006244819642 – ident: ref69 doi: 10.1007/s10021-007-9107-y – ident: ref15 doi: 10.1038/nature04514 – ident: ref12 doi: 10.1017/CBO9781107415324.015 – ident: ref21 doi: 10.1093/treephys/13.1.1 – ident: ref1 doi: 10.1029/2010JG001512 – ident: ref53 doi: 10.1139/x92-004 – ident: ref59 doi: 10.5194/bg-7-1715-2010 – ident: ref84 doi: 10.1007/s004420100691 – ident: ref28 – ident: ref46 doi: 10.5194/bg-9-2737-2012 – ident: ref4 doi: 10.1029/2008GM000829 – ident: ref49 – ident: ref81 doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2486.2000.00283.x – ident: ref26 doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2389.2001.00415.x – ident: ref77 – ident: ref39 doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2006.02.017 – ident: ref82 doi: 10.1007/s10342-008-0204-z – ident: ref74 doi: 10.1080/11956860.1997.11682416 |
SSID | ssj0038085 |
Score | 2.4465368 |
Snippet | Midlatitude treed bogs represent significant carbon (C) stocks and are highly sensitive to global climate change. In a dry continental treed bog, we compared... |
SourceID | doaj proquest gale crossref |
SourceType | Open Website Aggregation Database |
StartPage | 1091 |
SubjectTerms | Carbon dioxide Comparative analysis Environmental aspects Global temperature changes |
Title | Carbon dioxide flux and net primary production of a boreal treed bog: Responses to warming and water-table-lowering simulations of climate change |
URI | https://www.proquest.com/docview/1663938775 https://search.proquest.com/docview/1668259020 https://doaj.org/article/316d355192d942aabe0b2135647397c8 |
Volume | 12 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://sdu.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Lb9QwELagEhIXBAXEQosMQoJLVDt2Xr2V0qpcOLQgcbPGj0QrbZNqk6jlZ_CPmYmzK_aAuPS461lvPGN7vonH3zD2QQWZ1RAsrm_nEi1dlUDpReIE-Iz4xK2lE92Lq-Lbz_LLGdHkbEt9UU5YpAeOijtSMvfoExGI-EqnADYIm0qV5bpAV-riNV9RboKpuAerUkzFONE75_gAhYikPtiLPrINZSMQHybOEKqG-5c_mmj7_7U5Tx7n_Cl7MkNFfhIf8Rl7ENp99igWj_z1nP0-hbXtWu6X3d3SB16vxjsOredtGPhNJJHgN5HQFZXPu5oDR4sjMuR0FO3xQ3PML2OSbOj50PFboNSYZurmFlHoOhnoalWyolpq1NAvr-d6Xz116Fb4N0Pg8frwC_bj_Oz76UUyF1hIHC7FIalrpRDhCAEYqaLz9gV4xAzWIsrLamWxETAiAmHzrMqrzNeFr8iI9JrE61y9ZHtt14ZXjLvSYqiWOtx3vS6pKqXGvUJAJTKLIMQv2KeNms2sAoPxB1nE2MbIlI7CpSGLLNhnMsNWjAiwpy9wWph5Wpj_TYsFe09GNERx0VIOTQNj35uvV5fmRJcSQaSW6YJ9nIXqbliDg_lKAg6JWLF2JA92JHENut3mzVwx8x7QG4lgrlJlUeCI3m2b6ZeU19aGbpxkMESvELO_vo9Rv2GPSYPTlXtxwPaG9RgO2cPej2-n9fEHmKoO0A |
link.rule.ids | 315,782,786,866,2108,27935,27936 |
linkProvider | Directory of Open Access Journals |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Carbon+dioxide+flux+and+net+primary+production+of+a+boreal+treed+bog%3A+Responses+to+warming+and+water-table-lowering+simulations+of+climate+change&rft.jtitle=Biogeosciences&rft.au=Munir%2C+T+M&rft.au=Perkins%2C+M&rft.au=Kaing%2C+E&rft.au=Strack%2C+M&rft.date=2015-02-20&rft.pub=Copernicus+GmbH&rft.issn=1726-4170&rft.eissn=1726-4189&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1091&rft_id=info:doi/10.5194%2Fbg-12-1091-2015&rft.externalDBID=HAS_PDF_LINK&rft.externalDocID=3626352401 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1726-4189&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1726-4189&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1726-4189&client=summon |