Carbon dioxide flux and net primary production of a boreal treed bog: Responses to warming and water-table-lowering simulations of climate change

Midlatitude treed bogs represent significant carbon (C) stocks and are highly sensitive to global climate change. In a dry continental treed bog, we compared three sites: control, recent (1–3 years; experimental) and older drained (10–13 years), with water levels at 38, 74 and 120 cm below the surfa...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Biogeosciences Vol. 12; no. 4; pp. 1091 - 1111
Main Authors: Munir, T. M, Perkins, M, Kaing, E, Strack, M
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Katlenburg-Lindau Copernicus GmbH 20-02-2015
Copernicus Publications
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Abstract Midlatitude treed bogs represent significant carbon (C) stocks and are highly sensitive to global climate change. In a dry continental treed bog, we compared three sites: control, recent (1–3 years; experimental) and older drained (10–13 years), with water levels at 38, 74 and 120 cm below the surface, respectively. At each site we measured carbon dioxide (CO2) fluxes and estimated tree root respiration (Rr; across hummock–hollow microtopography of the forest floor) and net primary production (NPP) of trees during the growing seasons (May to October) of 2011–2013. The CO2–C balance was calculated by adding the net CO2 exchange of the forest floor (NEff-Rr) to the NPP of the trees. From cooler and wetter 2011 to the driest and the warmest 2013, the control site was a CO2–C sink of 92, 70 and 76 g m−2, the experimental site was a CO2–C source of 14, 57 and 135 g m−2, and the drained site was a progressively smaller source of 26, 23 and 13 g CO2–C m−2. The short-term drainage at the experimental site resulted in small changes in vegetation coverage and large net CO2 emissions at the microforms. In contrast, the longer-term drainage and deeper water level at the drained site resulted in the replacement of mosses with vascular plants (shrubs) on the hummocks and lichen in the hollows leading to the highest CO2 uptake at the drained hummocks and significant losses in the hollows. The tree NPP (including above- and below-ground growth and litter fall) in 2011 and 2012 was significantly higher at the drained site (92 and 83 g C m−2) than at the experimental (58 and 55 g C m−2) and control (52 and 46 g C m−2) sites. We also quantified the impact of climatic warming at all water table treatments by equipping additional plots with open-top chambers (OTCs) that caused a passive warming on average of ~ 1 °C and differential air warming of ~ 6 °C at midday full sun over the study years. Warming significantly enhanced shrub growth and the CO2 sink function of the drained hummocks (exceeding the cumulative respiration losses in hollows induced by the lowered water level × warming). There was an interaction of water level with warming across hummocks that resulted in the largest net CO2 uptake at the warmed drained hummocks. Thus in 2013, the warming treatment enhanced the sink function of the control site by 13 g m−2, reduced the source function of the experimental by 10 g m−2 and significantly enhanced the sink function of the drained site by 73 g m−2. Therefore, drying and warming in continental bogs is expected to initially accelerate CO2–C losses via ecosystem respiration, but persistent drought and warming is expected to restore the peatland's original CO2–C sink function as a result of the shifts in vegetation composition and productivity between the microforms and increased NPP of trees over time.
AbstractList Midlatitude treed bogs represent significant carbon (C) stocks and are highly sensitive to global climate change. In a dry continental treed bog, we compared three sites: control, recent (1-3 years; experimental) and older drained (10-13 years), with water levels at 38, 74 and 120 cm below the surface, respectively. At each site we measured carbon dioxide (CO2) fluxes and estimated tree root respiration (Rr; across hummock-hollow microtopography of the forest floor) and net primary production (NPP) of trees during the growing seasons (May to October) of 2011-2013. The CO2-C balance was calculated by adding the net CO2 exchange of the forest floor (NEff-Rr) to the NPP of the trees. From cooler and wetter 2011 to the driest and the warmest 2013, the control site was a CO2-C sink of 92, 70 and 76 g m-2, the experimental site was a CO2-C source of 14, 57 and 135 g m-2, and the drained site was a progressively smaller source of 26, 23 and 13 g CO2-C m-2. The short-term drainage at the experimental site resulted in small changes in vegetation coverage and large net CO2 emissions at the microforms. In contrast, the longer-term drainage and deeper water level at the drained site resulted in the replacement of mosses with vascular plants (shrubs) on the hummocks and lichen in the hollows leading to the highest CO2 uptake at the drained hummocks and significant losses in the hollows. The tree NPP (including above- and below-ground growth and litter fall) in 2011 and 2012 was significantly higher at the drained site (92 and 83 g C m-2) than at the experimental (58 and 55 g C m-2) and control (52 and 46 g C m-2) sites. We also quantified the impact of climatic warming at all water table treatments by equipping additional plots with open-top chambers (OTCs) that caused a passive warming on average of 1 degree C and differential air warming of 6 degree C at midday full sun over the study years. Warming significantly enhanced shrub growth and the CO2 sink function of the drained hummocks (exceeding the cumulative respiration losses in hollows induced by the lowered water level warming). There was an interaction of water level with warming across hummocks that resulted in the largest net CO2 uptake at the warmed drained hummocks. Thus in 2013, the warming treatment enhanced the sink function of the control site by 13 g m-2, reduced the source function of the experimental by 10 g m-2 and significantly enhanced the sink function of the drained site by 73 g m-2. Therefore, drying and warming in continental bogs is expected to initially accelerate CO2-C losses via ecosystem respiration, but persistent drought and warming is expected to restore the peatland's original CO2-C sink function as a result of the shifts in vegetation composition and productivity between the microforms and increased NPP of trees over time.
Midlatitude treed bogs represent significant carbon (C) stocks and are highly sensitive to global climate change. In a dry continental treed bog, we compared three sites: control, recent (1–3 years; experimental) and older drained (10–13 years), with water levels at 38, 74 and 120 cm below the surface, respectively. At each site we measured carbon dioxide (CO2) fluxes and estimated tree root respiration (Rr; across hummock–hollow microtopography of the forest floor) and net primary production (NPP) of trees during the growing seasons (May to October) of 2011–2013. The CO2–C balance was calculated by adding the net CO2 exchange of the forest floor (NEff-Rr) to the NPP of the trees. From cooler and wetter 2011 to the driest and the warmest 2013, the control site was a CO2–C sink of 92, 70 and 76 g m−2, the experimental site was a CO2–C source of 14, 57 and 135 g m−2, and the drained site was a progressively smaller source of 26, 23 and 13 g CO2–C m−2. The short-term drainage at the experimental site resulted in small changes in vegetation coverage and large net CO2 emissions at the microforms. In contrast, the longer-term drainage and deeper water level at the drained site resulted in the replacement of mosses with vascular plants (shrubs) on the hummocks and lichen in the hollows leading to the highest CO2 uptake at the drained hummocks and significant losses in the hollows. The tree NPP (including above- and below-ground growth and litter fall) in 2011 and 2012 was significantly higher at the drained site (92 and 83 g C m−2) than at the experimental (58 and 55 g C m−2) and control (52 and 46 g C m−2) sites. We also quantified the impact of climatic warming at all water table treatments by equipping additional plots with open-top chambers (OTCs) that caused a passive warming on average of ~ 1 °C and differential air warming of ~ 6 °C at midday full sun over the study years. Warming significantly enhanced shrub growth and the CO2 sink function of the drained hummocks (exceeding the cumulative respiration losses in hollows induced by the lowered water level × warming). There was an interaction of water level with warming across hummocks that resulted in the largest net CO2 uptake at the warmed drained hummocks. Thus in 2013, the warming treatment enhanced the sink function of the control site by 13 g m−2, reduced the source function of the experimental by 10 g m−2 and significantly enhanced the sink function of the drained site by 73 g m−2. Therefore, drying and warming in continental bogs is expected to initially accelerate CO2–C losses via ecosystem respiration, but persistent drought and warming is expected to restore the peatland's original CO2–C sink function as a result of the shifts in vegetation composition and productivity between the microforms and increased NPP of trees over time.
Midlatitude treed bogs represent significant carbon (C) stocks and are highly sensitive to global climate change. In a dry continental treed bog, we compared three sites: control, recent (1-3 years; experimental) and older drained (10-13 years), with water levels at 38, 74 and 120 cm below the surface, respectively. At each site we measured carbon dioxide (CO.sub.2) fluxes and estimated tree root respiration (R.sub.r ; across hummock-hollow microtopography of the forest floor) and net primary production (NPP) of trees during the growing seasons (May to October) of 2011-2013. The CO.sub.2 -C balance was calculated by adding the net CO.sub.2 exchange of the forest floor (NE.sub.ff -R.sub.r) to the NPP of the trees. From cooler and wetter 2011 to the driest and the warmest 2013, the control site was a CO.sub.2 -C sink of 92, 70 and 76 g m.sup.-2, the experimental site was a CO.sub.2 -C source of 14, 57 and 135 g m.sup.-2, and the drained site was a progressively smaller source of 26, 23 and 13 g CO.sub.2 -C m.sup.-2 . The short-term drainage at the experimental site resulted in small changes in vegetation coverage and large net CO.sub.2 emissions at the microforms. In contrast, the longer-term drainage and deeper water level at the drained site resulted in the replacement of mosses with vascular plants (shrubs) on the hummocks and lichen in the hollows leading to the highest CO.sub.2 uptake at the drained hummocks and significant losses in the hollows. The tree NPP (including above- and below-ground growth and litter fall) in 2011 and 2012 was significantly higher at the drained site (92 and 83 g C m.sup.-2) than at the experimental (58 and 55 g C m.sup.-2) and control (52 and 46 g C m.sup.-2) sites. We also quantified the impact of climatic warming at all water table treatments by equipping additional plots with open-top chambers (OTCs) that caused a passive warming on average of ~ 1 °C and differential air warming of ~ 6 °C at midday full sun over the study years. Warming significantly enhanced shrub growth and the CO.sub.2 sink function of the drained hummocks (exceeding the cumulative respiration losses in hollows induced by the lowered water level × warming). There was an interaction of water level with warming across hummocks that resulted in the largest net CO.sub.2 uptake at the warmed drained hummocks. Thus in 2013, the warming treatment enhanced the sink function of the control site by 13 g m.sup.-2, reduced the source function of the experimental by 10 g m.sup.-2 and significantly enhanced the sink function of the drained site by 73 g m.sup.-2 . Therefore, drying and warming in continental bogs is expected to initially accelerate CO.sub.2 -C losses via ecosystem respiration, but persistent drought and warming is expected to restore the peatland's original CO.sub.2 -C sink function as a result of the shifts in vegetation composition and productivity between the microforms and increased NPP of trees over time.
Midlatitude treed bogs represent significant carbon (C) stocks and are highly sensitive to global climate change. In a dry continental treed bog, we compared three sites: control, recent (1-3 years; experimental) and older drained (10-13 years), with water levels at 38, 74 and 120 cm below the surface, respectively. At each site we measured carbon dioxide (CO2) fluxes and estimated tree root respiration (Rr; across hummock-hollow microtopography of the forest floor) and net primary production (NPP) of trees during the growing seasons (May to October) of 2011-2013. The CO2-C balance was calculated by adding the net CO2 exchange of the forest floor (NEff-Rr) to the NPP of the trees. From cooler and wetter 2011 to the driest and the warmest 2013, the control site was a CO2-C sink of 92, 70 and 76 g m-2, the experimental site was a CO2-C source of 14, 57 and 135 g m-2, and the drained site was a progressively smaller source of 26, 23 and 13 g CO2-C m-2. The short-term drainage at the experimental site resulted in small changes in vegetation coverage and large net CO2 emissions at the microforms. In contrast, the longer-term drainage and deeper water level at the drained site resulted in the replacement of mosses with vascular plants (shrubs) on the hummocks and lichen in the hollows leading to the highest CO2 uptake at the drained hummocks and significant losses in the hollows. The tree NPP (including above- and below-ground growth and litter fall) in 2011 and 2012 was significantly higher at the drained site (92 and 83 g C m-2) than at the experimental (58 and 55 g C m-2) and control (52 and 46 g C m-2) sites. We also quantified the impact of climatic warming at all water table treatments by equipping additional plots with open-top chambers (OTCs) that caused a passive warming on average of ~ 1 °C and differential air warming of ~ 6 °C at midday full sun over the study years. Warming significantly enhanced shrub growth and the CO2 sink function of the drained hummocks (exceeding the cumulative respiration losses in hollows induced by the lowered water level × warming). There was an interaction of water level with warming across hummocks that resulted in the largest net CO2 uptake at the warmed drained hummocks. Thus in 2013, the warming treatment enhanced the sink function of the control site by 13 g m-2, reduced the source function of the experimental by 10 g m-2 and significantly enhanced the sink function of the drained site by 73 g m-2. Therefore, drying and warming in continental bogs is expected to initially accelerate CO2-C losses via ecosystem respiration, but persistent drought and warming is expected to restore the peatland's original CO2-C sink function as a result of the shifts in vegetation composition and productivity between the microforms and increased NPP of trees over time.
Audience Academic
Author Munir, T. M
Strack, M
Perkins, M
Kaing, E
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  fullname: Munir, T. M
– sequence: 2
  fullname: Perkins, M
– sequence: 3
  fullname: Kaing, E
– sequence: 4
  fullname: Strack, M
BookMark eNptkk1v1DAQhiNUJNrCmaslLnBI6484iblVKz5WqoRU4GyN40nwKomL7WiXn8E_xulWwCLkw9jjZ97RjN6L4mz2MxbFS0avJFPVtRlKxktGFSs5ZfJJcc4aXpcVa9XZX_dnxUWMO0pFS1t5XvzcQDB-Jtb5g7NI-nE5EJgtmTGR--AmCD9y9Hbpksuc7wkQ4wPCSFJAtPkxvCV3GO_9HDGS5MkewuTm4UFmDwlDmcCMWI5-j2H9iG5aRlj14irYjblNQtJ9g3nA58XTHsaILx7jZfH1_bsvm4_l7acP283NbdlJRlPZ90LUjFMKTAjKhW3AUtoYI2spe2HyJ1RKATW1VLWStm-somBl3g21VS0ui-1R13rY6cdRtQenHxI-DBpCct2IWrDaCpm3zK2qOIBBajgTsq4aoZquzVqvj1p5U98XjElPLnY4jjCjX6Jmdd1yqSinGX31D7rzS5jzpCsllGibRv6hBsj93dz7FKBbRfVN1bKKi4rxTF39h8rH4uS6bI_e5fxJwZuTgswkPKQBlhj19vPdKXt9ZLvgYwzY_94Ro3p1nDaDZlyvjtOr48QvSK3HrQ
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_3390_f8030075
crossref_primary_10_5194_bg_18_4817_2021
crossref_primary_10_3390_f11050594
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jhydrol_2018_05_041
crossref_primary_10_3390_agriculture9070153
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10021_016_0092_x
crossref_primary_10_3389_feart_2021_650662
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_soilbio_2024_109346
crossref_primary_10_5194_bg_17_5693_2020
crossref_primary_10_1029_2021EF002630
crossref_primary_10_1111_1365_2435_13883
crossref_primary_10_3390_soilsystems6040077
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ecoleng_2017_05_011
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_geoderma_2016_03_011
crossref_primary_10_1029_2018JG004486
crossref_primary_10_1029_2018MS001574
crossref_primary_10_1007_s13157_022_01546_6
crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_4017537
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11273_020_09715_2
crossref_primary_10_2134_jeq2019_04_0163
crossref_primary_10_3389_fpls_2017_00249
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2015_11_149
crossref_primary_10_1111_jvs_12794
crossref_primary_10_1088_2752_5295_acc67e
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2019_134613
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11273_021_09784_x
crossref_primary_10_1080_07011784_2023_2269137
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10021_017_0213_1
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11104_022_05561_8
crossref_primary_10_1080_01904167_2020_1727509
crossref_primary_10_1002_eco_1893
crossref_primary_10_1515_opag_2020_0023
crossref_primary_10_1002_eco_2100
crossref_primary_10_1639_0007_2745_118_4_412
crossref_primary_10_3390_agronomy9070343
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11356_022_18745_7
crossref_primary_10_1590_0102_33062018abb0095
crossref_primary_10_1073_pnas_2101742118
crossref_primary_10_1029_2020AV000163
crossref_primary_10_1088_1748_9326_acc194
crossref_primary_10_1111_1365_2435_12891
crossref_primary_10_1111_gcb_15753
crossref_primary_10_1002_ece3_5068
crossref_primary_10_5194_bg_15_3937_2018
crossref_primary_10_1111_nph_15629
crossref_primary_10_1002_ecm_1371
crossref_primary_10_1126_sciadv_aav1131
crossref_primary_10_3390_plants10102057
crossref_primary_10_7717_peerj_8530
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_022_23548_4
crossref_primary_10_3389_feart_2021_631368
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11676_019_00963_4
crossref_primary_10_1111_gcb_14140
crossref_primary_10_3390_soilsystems5020035
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2018_11_151
crossref_primary_10_1111_gcb_13844
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10533_020_00707_1
crossref_primary_10_3389_feart_2020_557943
crossref_primary_10_1080_20964129_2020_1806113
crossref_primary_10_1007_s42974_024_00198_2
crossref_primary_10_1111_gcb_14617
crossref_primary_10_3390_su131910874
crossref_primary_10_3390_su10093288
crossref_primary_10_1029_2022JG007206
crossref_primary_10_1007_s13157_023_01692_5
crossref_primary_10_1111_gcb_14057
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10021_021_00736_3
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2020_144071
Cites_doi 10.1038/ngeo331
10.1080/02723646.2000.10642719
10.1007/978-94-007-4159-1_10
10.1029/2008GB003327
10.1139/x93-177
10.5194/bg-9-3305-2012
10.1139/b87-111
10.1139/x02-165
10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01247.x
10.1023/A:1009812024996
10.1038/25119
10.1139/x84-085
10.1016/j.gloplacha.2006.03.012
10.1111/j.1600-0889.2007.00309.x
10.1007/s10021-009-9228-6
10.1139/x90-133
10.1007/s10021-014-9795-z
10.1080/02827580500281975
10.5194/bg-4-1005-2007
10.7202/004838ar
10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01756.x
10.1046/j.1365-2486.2000.00363.x
10.2307/2530695
10.1029/2002GB001946
10.5194/bg-11-807-2014
10.1111/j.1365-2486.2007.01529.x
10.1016/0038-0717(93)90234-3
10.1046/j.1365-2486.2001.00412.x
10.4319/lo.2007.52.1.0096
10.1017/S0376892902000024
10.2307/3547057
10.1016/j.agrformet.2008.11.007
10.1046/j.1365-2486.2003.00571.x
10.1111/j.1365-3040.2009.02089.x
10.1029/2005JG000145
10.1007/BF03161336
10.1111/j.1365-2389.2012.01499.x
10.1016/S0168-1923(02)00100-4
10.1046/j.1365-2486.2002.00521.x
10.1016/j.agrformet.2006.03.022
10.1007/978-3-662-03125-4
10.1016/j.chemosphere.2007.06.042
10.1029/2010JG001507
10.1007/s10021-013-9646-3
10.5194/bg-10-929-2013
10.5194/bg-8-3203-2011
10.1007/s10021-007-9046-7
10.1890/0012-9658(2000)081[3464:ROBAFP]2.0.CO;2
10.1672/0277-5212(2004)024[0357:AAOTCT]2.0.CO;2
10.1029/2001GL014000
10.5194/bg-5-1475-2008
10.1890/0012-9658(1999)080[0161:CBOABB]2.0.CO;2
10.1890/09-0135.1
10.1007/s10021-009-9292-y
10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.02104.x
10.1139/b11-068
10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01292.x
10.1038/nclimate1864
10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.02357.x
10.5194/bg-9-4071-2012
10.1093/treephys/tpq002
10.1046/j.0022-0477.2001.00633.x
10.1023/A:1006244819642
10.1007/s10021-007-9107-y
10.1038/nature04514
10.1017/CBO9781107415324.015
10.1093/treephys/13.1.1
10.1029/2010JG001512
10.1139/x92-004
10.5194/bg-7-1715-2010
10.1007/s004420100691
10.5194/bg-9-2737-2012
10.1029/2008GM000829
10.1046/j.1365-2486.2000.00283.x
10.1046/j.1365-2389.2001.00415.x
10.1016/j.soilbio.2006.02.017
10.1007/s10342-008-0204-z
10.1080/11956860.1997.11682416
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright COPYRIGHT 2015 Copernicus GmbH
Copyright Copernicus GmbH 2015
Copyright_xml – notice: COPYRIGHT 2015 Copernicus GmbH
– notice: Copyright Copernicus GmbH 2015
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
ISR
7QO
7SN
7TG
7TN
7UA
8FD
8FE
8FG
8FH
ABJCF
ABUWG
AFKRA
ATCPS
AZQEC
BBNVY
BENPR
BFMQW
BGLVJ
BHPHI
BKSAR
C1K
CCPQU
DWQXO
F1W
FR3
GNUQQ
H95
H96
HCIFZ
KL.
L.G
L6V
LK8
M7N
M7P
M7S
P64
PATMY
PCBAR
PIMPY
PQEST
PQQKQ
PQUKI
PRINS
PTHSS
PYCSY
7QH
7ST
7U6
SOI
DOA
DOI 10.5194/bg-12-1091-2015
DatabaseName CrossRef
Science in Context
Biotechnology Research Abstracts
Ecology Abstracts
Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts
Oceanic Abstracts
Water Resources Abstracts
Technology Research Database
ProQuest SciTech Collection
ProQuest Technology Collection
ProQuest Natural Science Collection
Materials Science & Engineering Collection
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
ProQuest Central
Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection
ProQuest Central Essentials
Biological Science Collection
ProQuest Central
Continental Europe Database
Technology Collection
Natural Science Collection
Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection
Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest Central Korea
ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts
Engineering Research Database
ProQuest Central Student
Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources
Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources
SciTech Premium Collection
Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic
Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional
ProQuest Engineering Collection
ProQuest Biological Science Collection
Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)
Biological Science Database
Engineering Database
Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts
Environmental Science Database
Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database
Publicly Available Content Database
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest Central China
Engineering Collection
Environmental Science Collection
Aqualine
Environment Abstracts
Sustainability Science Abstracts
Environment Abstracts
Directory of Open Access Journals
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
Publicly Available Content Database
Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional
ProQuest Central Student
Technology Collection
Technology Research Database
ProQuest Central Essentials
ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)
SciTech Premium Collection
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest Natural Science Collection
ProQuest Central China
Water Resources Abstracts
Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management
Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection
ProQuest Central
ProQuest Engineering Collection
Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts
Biotechnology Research Abstracts
Oceanic Abstracts
Natural Science Collection
ProQuest Central Korea
Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)
Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection
Biological Science Collection
Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources
Engineering Collection
Engineering Database
ProQuest Biological Science Collection
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition
Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database
ProQuest Technology Collection
Continental Europe Database
Biological Science Database
ProQuest SciTech Collection
Ecology Abstracts
Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts
Environmental Science Collection
Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts
Materials Science & Engineering Collection
Environmental Science Database
Engineering Research Database
ProQuest One Academic
Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic
Sustainability Science Abstracts
Aqualine
Environment Abstracts
DatabaseTitleList Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional
CrossRef


Publicly Available Content Database
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: DOA
  name: Directory of Open Access Journals
  url: http://www.doaj.org/
  sourceTypes: Open Website
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Biology
EISSN 1726-4189
EndPage 1111
ExternalDocumentID oai_doaj_org_article_316d355192d942aabe0b2135647397c8
3626352401
A481423412
10_5194_bg_12_1091_2015
GroupedDBID 23N
2WC
2XV
3V.
4P2
5GY
5VS
7XC
8FE
8FG
8FH
8R4
8R5
AAFWJ
AAYXX
ABJCF
ABUWG
ADBBV
AENEX
AFKRA
AFPKN
AHGZY
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ATCPS
BBNVY
BBORY
BCNDV
BENPR
BFMQW
BGLVJ
BHPHI
BKSAR
BPHCQ
CCPQU
CITATION
E3Z
EBD
EBS
EDH
EJD
GROUPED_DOAJ
H13
HCIFZ
HH5
IAO
IEA
IPNFZ
ISR
ITC
KQ8
L6V
L8X
LK5
LK8
M7P
M7R
M7S
MM-
M~E
OK1
P2P
PATMY
PCBAR
PIMPY
PQQKQ
PROAC
PTHSS
PYCSY
Q2X
RIG
RKB
RNS
TR2
XSB
~02
7QO
7SN
7TG
7TN
7UA
8FD
AZQEC
C1K
DWQXO
F1W
FR3
GNUQQ
H95
H96
KL.
L.G
M7N
P64
PQEST
PQUKI
PRINS
7QH
7ST
7U6
SOI
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c510t-ff3361200a133023d7ad007bb5655f3b361a499a0b659695df7d90ad50150d463
IEDL.DBID DOA
ISSN 1726-4189
1726-4170
IngestDate Tue Oct 22 15:14:43 EDT 2024
Fri Oct 25 04:39:03 EDT 2024
Thu Oct 10 17:13:40 EDT 2024
Tue Nov 19 21:00:51 EST 2024
Tue Nov 12 22:49:48 EST 2024
Thu Aug 01 20:11:37 EDT 2024
Fri Aug 23 03:00:33 EDT 2024
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 4
Language English
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c510t-ff3361200a133023d7ad007bb5655f3b361a499a0b659695df7d90ad50150d463
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ORCID 0000-0001-6767-2707
0000-0002-8996-7271
OpenAccessLink https://doaj.org/article/316d355192d942aabe0b2135647397c8
PQID 1663938775
PQPubID 105740
PageCount 21
ParticipantIDs doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_316d355192d942aabe0b2135647397c8
proquest_miscellaneous_1668259020
proquest_journals_1663938775
gale_infotracmisc_A481423412
gale_infotracacademiconefile_A481423412
gale_incontextgauss_ISR_A481423412
crossref_primary_10_5194_bg_12_1091_2015
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2015-02-20
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2015-02-20
PublicationDate_xml – month: 02
  year: 2015
  text: 2015-02-20
  day: 20
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace Katlenburg-Lindau
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Katlenburg-Lindau
PublicationTitle Biogeosciences
PublicationYear 2015
Publisher Copernicus GmbH
Copernicus Publications
Publisher_xml – name: Copernicus GmbH
– name: Copernicus Publications
References ref13
ref57
ref12
ref56
ref15
ref59
ref14
ref58
ref53
ref52
ref11
ref55
ref10
ref54
ref17
ref16
ref19
ref18
ref51
ref50
ref46
ref45
ref48
ref47
ref42
ref86
ref41
ref85
ref44
ref43
ref87
ref49
ref8
ref7
ref9
ref4
ref3
ref6
ref5
ref82
ref81
ref40
ref84
ref83
ref80
ref35
ref79
ref34
ref78
ref37
ref36
ref31
ref75
ref30
ref74
ref33
ref77
ref32
ref76
ref2
ref1
ref39
ref38
ref71
ref70
ref73
ref72
ref24
ref68
ref23
ref67
ref26
ref25
ref69
ref20
ref64
ref63
ref22
ref66
ref21
ref65
ref28
ref27
ref29
ref60
ref62
ref61
References_xml – ident: ref29
  doi: 10.1038/ngeo331
– ident: ref80
  doi: 10.1080/02723646.2000.10642719
– ident: ref5
  doi: 10.1007/978-94-007-4159-1_10
– ident: ref73
  doi: 10.1029/2008GB003327
– ident: ref7
  doi: 10.1139/x93-177
– ident: ref38
  doi: 10.5194/bg-9-3305-2012
– ident: ref20
– ident: ref42
  doi: 10.1139/b87-111
– ident: ref41
  doi: 10.1139/x02-165
– ident: ref52
  doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01247.x
– ident: ref66
  doi: 10.1023/A:1009812024996
– ident: ref6
  doi: 10.1038/25119
– ident: ref18
  doi: 10.1139/x84-085
– ident: ref72
  doi: 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2006.03.012
– ident: ref3
  doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0889.2007.00309.x
– ident: ref78
  doi: 10.1007/s10021-009-9228-6
– ident: ref48
  doi: 10.1139/x90-133
– ident: ref17
– ident: ref54
  doi: 10.1007/s10021-014-9795-z
– ident: ref79
  doi: 10.1080/02827580500281975
– ident: ref36
  doi: 10.5194/bg-4-1005-2007
– ident: ref61
– ident: ref35
  doi: 10.7202/004838ar
– ident: ref86
  doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01756.x
– ident: ref25
  doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2486.2000.00363.x
– ident: ref31
  doi: 10.2307/2530695
– ident: ref8
  doi: 10.1029/2002GB001946
– ident: ref55
  doi: 10.5194/bg-11-807-2014
– ident: ref37
  doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2007.01529.x
– ident: ref27
  doi: 10.1016/0038-0717(93)90234-3
– ident: ref30
  doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2486.2001.00412.x
– ident: ref34
  doi: 10.4319/lo.2007.52.1.0096
– ident: ref50
  doi: 10.1017/S0376892902000024
– ident: ref13
  doi: 10.2307/3547057
– ident: ref58
  doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2008.11.007
– ident: ref85
  doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2486.2003.00571.x
– ident: ref23
– ident: ref9
  doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2009.02089.x
– ident: ref68
  doi: 10.1029/2005JG000145
– ident: ref71
  doi: 10.1007/BF03161336
– ident: ref65
  doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2389.2012.01499.x
– ident: ref14
  doi: 10.1016/S0168-1923(02)00100-4
– ident: ref60
  doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2486.2002.00521.x
– ident: ref70
  doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2006.03.022
– ident: ref16
– ident: ref57
  doi: 10.1007/978-3-662-03125-4
– ident: ref75
  doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2007.06.042
– ident: ref19
  doi: 10.1029/2010JG001507
– ident: ref32
  doi: 10.1007/s10021-013-9646-3
– ident: ref10
  doi: 10.5194/bg-10-929-2013
– ident: ref45
  doi: 10.5194/bg-8-3203-2011
– ident: ref62
  doi: 10.1007/s10021-007-9046-7
– ident: ref64
– ident: ref83
  doi: 10.1890/0012-9658(2000)081[3464:ROBAFP]2.0.CO;2
– ident: ref44
  doi: 10.1672/0277-5212(2004)024[0357:AAOTCT]2.0.CO;2
– ident: ref76
  doi: 10.1029/2001GL014000
– ident: ref43
  doi: 10.5194/bg-5-1475-2008
– ident: ref2
  doi: 10.1890/0012-9658(1999)080[0161:CBOABB]2.0.CO;2
– ident: ref33
  doi: 10.1890/09-0135.1
– ident: ref11
  doi: 10.1007/s10021-009-9292-y
– ident: ref47
  doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.02104.x
– ident: ref40
  doi: 10.1139/b11-068
– ident: ref63
  doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01292.x
– ident: ref67
  doi: 10.1038/nclimate1864
– ident: ref56
  doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.02357.x
– ident: ref87
  doi: 10.5194/bg-9-4071-2012
– ident: ref24
  doi: 10.1093/treephys/tpq002
– ident: ref51
  doi: 10.1046/j.0022-0477.2001.00633.x
– ident: ref22
  doi: 10.1023/A:1006244819642
– ident: ref69
  doi: 10.1007/s10021-007-9107-y
– ident: ref15
  doi: 10.1038/nature04514
– ident: ref12
  doi: 10.1017/CBO9781107415324.015
– ident: ref21
  doi: 10.1093/treephys/13.1.1
– ident: ref1
  doi: 10.1029/2010JG001512
– ident: ref53
  doi: 10.1139/x92-004
– ident: ref59
  doi: 10.5194/bg-7-1715-2010
– ident: ref84
  doi: 10.1007/s004420100691
– ident: ref28
– ident: ref46
  doi: 10.5194/bg-9-2737-2012
– ident: ref4
  doi: 10.1029/2008GM000829
– ident: ref49
– ident: ref81
  doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2486.2000.00283.x
– ident: ref26
  doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2389.2001.00415.x
– ident: ref77
– ident: ref39
  doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2006.02.017
– ident: ref82
  doi: 10.1007/s10342-008-0204-z
– ident: ref74
  doi: 10.1080/11956860.1997.11682416
SSID ssj0038085
Score 2.4465368
Snippet Midlatitude treed bogs represent significant carbon (C) stocks and are highly sensitive to global climate change. In a dry continental treed bog, we compared...
SourceID doaj
proquest
gale
crossref
SourceType Open Website
Aggregation Database
StartPage 1091
SubjectTerms Carbon dioxide
Comparative analysis
Environmental aspects
Global temperature changes
Title Carbon dioxide flux and net primary production of a boreal treed bog: Responses to warming and water-table-lowering simulations of climate change
URI https://www.proquest.com/docview/1663938775
https://search.proquest.com/docview/1668259020
https://doaj.org/article/316d355192d942aabe0b2135647397c8
Volume 12
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://sdu.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Lb9QwELagEhIXBAXEQosMQoJLVDt2Xr2V0qpcOLQgcbPGj0QrbZNqk6jlZ_CPmYmzK_aAuPS461lvPGN7vonH3zD2QQWZ1RAsrm_nEi1dlUDpReIE-Iz4xK2lE92Lq-Lbz_LLGdHkbEt9UU5YpAeOijtSMvfoExGI-EqnADYIm0qV5bpAV-riNV9RboKpuAerUkzFONE75_gAhYikPtiLPrINZSMQHybOEKqG-5c_mmj7_7U5Tx7n_Cl7MkNFfhIf8Rl7ENp99igWj_z1nP0-hbXtWu6X3d3SB16vxjsOredtGPhNJJHgN5HQFZXPu5oDR4sjMuR0FO3xQ3PML2OSbOj50PFboNSYZurmFlHoOhnoalWyolpq1NAvr-d6Xz116Fb4N0Pg8frwC_bj_Oz76UUyF1hIHC7FIalrpRDhCAEYqaLz9gV4xAzWIsrLamWxETAiAmHzrMqrzNeFr8iI9JrE61y9ZHtt14ZXjLvSYqiWOtx3vS6pKqXGvUJAJTKLIMQv2KeNms2sAoPxB1nE2MbIlI7CpSGLLNhnMsNWjAiwpy9wWph5Wpj_TYsFe09GNERx0VIOTQNj35uvV5fmRJcSQaSW6YJ9nIXqbliDg_lKAg6JWLF2JA92JHENut3mzVwx8x7QG4lgrlJlUeCI3m2b6ZeU19aGbpxkMESvELO_vo9Rv2GPSYPTlXtxwPaG9RgO2cPej2-n9fEHmKoO0A
link.rule.ids 315,782,786,866,2108,27935,27936
linkProvider Directory of Open Access Journals
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Carbon+dioxide+flux+and+net+primary+production+of+a+boreal+treed+bog%3A+Responses+to+warming+and+water-table-lowering+simulations+of+climate+change&rft.jtitle=Biogeosciences&rft.au=Munir%2C+T+M&rft.au=Perkins%2C+M&rft.au=Kaing%2C+E&rft.au=Strack%2C+M&rft.date=2015-02-20&rft.pub=Copernicus+GmbH&rft.issn=1726-4170&rft.eissn=1726-4189&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1091&rft_id=info:doi/10.5194%2Fbg-12-1091-2015&rft.externalDBID=HAS_PDF_LINK&rft.externalDocID=3626352401
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1726-4189&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1726-4189&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1726-4189&client=summon