Protein evolution speed depends on its stability and abundance and on chaperone concentrations

Proteins evolve at different rates. What drives the speed of protein sequence changes? Two main factors are a protein’s folding stability and aggregation propensity. By combining the hydrophobic–polar (HP) model with the Zwanzig–Szabo–Bagchi rate theory, we find that: (i) Adaptation is strongly acce...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS Vol. 115; no. 37; pp. 9092 - 9097
Main Authors: Agozzino, Luca, Dill, Ken A.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: United States National Academy of Sciences 11-09-2018
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Proteins evolve at different rates. What drives the speed of protein sequence changes? Two main factors are a protein’s folding stability and aggregation propensity. By combining the hydrophobic–polar (HP) model with the Zwanzig–Szabo–Bagchi rate theory, we find that: (i) Adaptation is strongly accelerated by selection pressure, explaining the broad variation from days to thousands of years over which organisms adapt to new environments. (ii) The proteins that adapt fastest are those that are not very stably folded, because their fitness landscapes are steepest. And because heating destabilizes folded proteins, we predict that cells should adapt faster when put into warmer rather than cooler environments. (iii) Increasing protein abundance slows down evolution (the substitution rate of the sequence) because a typical protein is not perfectly fit, so increasing its number of copies reduces the cell’s fitness. (iv) However, chaperones can mitigate this abundance effect and accelerate evolution (also called evolutionary capacitance) by effectively enhancing protein stability. This model explains key observations about protein evolution rates.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Contributed by Ken A. Dill, July 23, 2018 (sent for review June 13, 2018; reviewed by Irene A. Chen and Claus O. Wilke)
Author contributions: K.A.D. designed research; L.A. and K.A.D. performed research; and L.A. and K.A.D. wrote the paper.
Reviewers: I.A.C., University of California, Santa Barbara; and C.O.W., The University of Texas at Austin.
ISSN:0027-8424
1091-6490
DOI:10.1073/pnas.1810194115