Genetic analysis of growth curve parameters for male and female chickens resulting from selection on shape of growth curve

• Published in: Journal of animal science Vol. 78; no. 10; pp. 2515 - 2524
• Main Authors: Mignon-Grasteau, S, Piles, M, Varona, L, de Rochambeau, H, Poivey, J. P, Blasco, A, Beaumont, C
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Savoy, IL Am Soc Animal Sci 01-10-2000; American Society of Animal Science; Oxford University Press
• Subjects: Animal productions; Animals; Biological and medical sciences; Body Weight; Chickens - genetics; Chickens - growth & development; Computer Science; Female; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology; Gallus gallus; Genetics; Growth - genetics; Life Sciences; Male; Models, Biological; Physical growth; Poultry; Sex Characteristics; Sexes; Terrestrial animal productions; Vertebrates; Weight; Farming animal; Genetic parameter; Experimental study; Weight gain; Growth curve; Vertebrata; Meat animals; Genetic improvement; Chicken; Broiler chickens; Sexual dimorphism; Aves; Sampling; GIBBS SAMPLING; SEXUAL DIMORPHISM; CHICKENS; GENETIC PARAMETERS; GROWTH
• ISSN: 0021-8812; 1525-3163; 0021-8812
• DOI: 10.2527/2000.78102515x

The objectives of this research were to evaluate gender differences and selection on body weight as they affect growth curves of chickens. Marginal posterior densities of growth curve parameters were studied by Gibbs sampling on 10,671 male and female chickens originating from five lines. Line X-+ was selected on low body weight at 8 wk (BW8) and high body weight at 36 wk (BW36), line X+- on high BW8 and low BW36, X++ on high BW8 and BW36, X-- on low BW8, and BW36, and X00 was an unselected control line. Growth was modeled by a Gompertz function. Heritabilities and genetic correlations among parameters of the Gompertz curve were estimated. Marginal posterior densities were drawn for parameters of the growth curve and for sexual dimorphism at ages ranging from hatching to 1 yr. Lines selected for a higher BW8 had higher initial specific growth rates (L), higher maturation rates (K), and lower ages at inflection (T(I)). Lines selected for a higher BW36 had higher asymptotic body weights (A). Estimates of A, L, and T(I) were higher in males and K was higher in females. Difference between sexes for A was greater in the line selected for a lower BW8 and a higher BW36. Dimorphism for L and K was the lowest in lines X++ and X--, respectively. The greatest difference in T(I) was observed in the line selected for lower BW8 and BW36. Sexual dimorphism of body weight was lower at most ages in the lightest line. Before 15 wk, sexual dimorphism in X++ line was lower than in the line selected for higher BW8 and lower BW36. The increase in sexual dimorphism with body weight could be reduced by selecting animals on body weight at two ages instead of one, as is usually done in commercial lines.