Spatial mapping of humeral head bone density

• Published in: Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery Vol. 26; no. 9; pp. 1653 - 1661
• Main Authors: Alidousti, Hamidreza, PhD, Giles, Joshua W., PhD, Emery, Roger J.H., MS, FRCS (ED), Jeffers, Jonathan, PhD
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Elsevier Inc 01-09-2017; Mosby
• Subjects: Aged; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Shoulder; Bone Density; Cadaver; Female; Humans; humeral bone density; humeral component; Humeral Head - diagnostic imaging; implant design; implant fixation; implant loosening; Male; Middle Aged; Orthopedics; Prosthesis Design; short-stem devices; Shoulder arthroplasty; Shoulder Prosthesis; Tomography, X-Ray Computed; humeral bone density; Shoulder arthroplasty; Imaging; short-stem devices; implant fixation; Basic Science; implant loosening; implant design; Anatomy Study; humeral component
• ISSN: 1058-2746; 1532-6500
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2017.03.006

Background Short-stem humeral replacements achieve fixation by anchoring to the metaphyseal trabecular bone. Fixing the implant in high-density bone can provide strong fixation and reduce the risk of loosening. However, there is a lack of data mapping the bone density distribution in the proximal humerus. The aim of the study was to investigate the bone density in proximal humerus. Methods Eight computed tomography scans of healthy cadaveric humeri were used to map bone density distribution in the humeral head. The proximal humeral head was divided into 12 slices parallel to the humeral anatomic neck. Each slice was then divided into 4 concentric circles. The slices below the anatomic neck, where short-stem implants have their fixation features, were further divided into radial sectors. The average bone density for each of these regions was calculated, and regions of interest were compared using a repeated-measures analysis of variance with significance set at P  < .05. Results Average apparent bone density was found to decrease from proximal to distal regions, with the majority of higher bone density proximal to the anatomic neck of the humerus ( P  < .05). Below the anatomic neck, bone density increases from central to peripheral regions, where cortical bone eventually occupies the space ( P  < .05). In distal slices below the anatomic neck, a higher bone density distribution in the medial calcar region was also observed. Conclusion This study indicates that it is advantageous with respect to implant fixation to preserve some bone above the anatomic neck and epiphyseal plate and to use the denser bone at the periphery.