Dimensionality and stages of severity of DSM-5 criteria in an international sample of alcohol-consuming individuals

• Published in: Psychological medicine Vol. 44; no. 15; p. 3303
• Main Authors: Preuss, U W, Watzke, S, Wurst, F M
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England 01-11-2014
• Subjects: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Alcohol-Related Disorders - classification; Alcohol-Related Disorders - diagnosis; Australia; Brazil; Canada; Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders; Disease Progression; Female; Finland; Humans; Japan; Male; Middle Aged; Severity of Illness Index; Young Adult; Brazil; Canada; Australia; Japan; Finland
• DOI: 10.1017/S0033291714000889
• EISSN: 1469-8978

The DSM-5 alcohol use disorder (AUD) criteria proposal contains 11 criteria that include most of the DSM-IV abuse and dependence criteria plus craving. The aims of the current study in a large and international alcohol-consuming sample were to confirm the dimensionality of the DSM-5 AUD criteria and to differentiate grades of severity of DSM-5 AUD in subjects who pass the proposed DSM-5 diagnostic threshold of two criteria.
We used the World Health Organization (WHO)/International Society on Biomedical Research on Alcoholism (ISBRA) Study on State and Trait Markers of Alcohol Use and Dependence dataset. Subjects included in the analyses were aged ≥ 18 years and were recruited in five countries: Australia, Brazil, Canada, Finland and Japan. Assessment of AUD and additional characteristics was conducted using an adapted version of the Alcohol Use Disorder and Associated Disabilities Interview Schedule (AUDADIS). Dimensionality of the DSM-5 criteria was evaluated using factor analysis and item response theory (IRT) models. The IRT results led to the classification of AUD patients into three severity groups. External validators were used to differentiate statistically across subgroups.
A total of 1424 currently drinking individuals were included in the analyses. Factor and IRT analyses confirmed the dimensional structure of DSM-5 AUD criteria. More than 99% of the subjects could be allocated to one of the suggested severity subgroups. The magnitude of the external validators differed significantly across the severity groups.
The results confirm the dimensional structure of the proposed DSM-5 AUD criteria. The suggested stages of severity (mild, moderate and severe) may be useful to clinicians by grouping individuals not only in the mild but also in the moderate to severe spectrum of DSM-5 AUD.