Functional endoscopic sinus surgery training simulator

Objective/Hypothesis: To determine the efficacy of a haptic (force feedback) device and to compare isosurface and volumetric models of a functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) training simulator. Study Design: A pilot study involving faculty and residents from the Department of Otolaryngology at...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Laryngoscope Vol. 108; no. 11; pp. 1643 - 1647
Main Authors: Rudman, David T., Stredney, Don, Sessanna, Dennis, Yagel, Roni, Crawfis, Roger, Heskamp, David, Edmond, Charles V., Wiet, Gregory J.
Format: Journal Article Conference Proceeding
Language:English
Published: Hoboken, NJ John Wiley & Sons, Inc 01-11-1998
Wiley-Blackwell
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Objective/Hypothesis: To determine the efficacy of a haptic (force feedback) device and to compare isosurface and volumetric models of a functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) training simulator. Study Design: A pilot study involving faculty and residents from the Department of Otolaryngology at The Ohio State University. Methods: Objective trials evaluated the haptic device's ability to perceive three‐dimensional shapes (stereognosis) without the aid of image visualization. Ethmoidectomy tasks were performed with both isosurface and volumetric FESS simulators, and surveys compared the two models. Results: The haptic device was 77% effective for stereognosis tasks. There was a preference toward the isosurface model over the volumetric model in terms of visual representation, comfort, haptic‐visual fidelity, and overall performance. Conclusions: The FESS simulator uses both visual and haptic feedback to create a virtual reality environment to teach paranasal sinus anatomy and basic endoscopic sinus surgery techniques to ear, nose, and throat residents. The results of the current study showed that the haptic device was accurate in and of itself, within its current physical limitations, and that the isosurface‐based simulator was preferred. Laryngoscope, 108:1643–1647, 1998
Bibliography:This project was funded by the U.S. Army Medical Research and Material Command under cooperative agreement DAMD17-95-2-5023.
Presented at the 101st Annual Meeting of the American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc., Palm Beach, Florida, May 12, 1998.
istex:60EF0334A7500ECE7789781DC0C667841045DA87
ArticleID:LARY5541081110
ark:/67375/WNG-JF44Z81S-B
This project was funded by the U.S. Army Medical Research and Material Command under cooperative agreement DAMD17–95–2–5023.
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0023-852X
1531-4995
DOI:10.1097/00005537-199811000-00010