Continuous Electroencephalography After Moderate to Severe Traumatic Brain Injury
OBJECTIVES:After traumatic brain injury, continuous electroencephalography is widely used to detect electrographic seizures. With the development of standardized continuous electroencephalography terminology, we aimed to describe the prevalence and burden of ictal-interictal patterns, including elec...
Saved in:
Published in: | Critical care medicine Vol. 47; no. 4; pp. 574 - 582 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
United States
by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc
01-04-2019
Copyright by by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | OBJECTIVES:After traumatic brain injury, continuous electroencephalography is widely used to detect electrographic seizures. With the development of standardized continuous electroencephalography terminology, we aimed to describe the prevalence and burden of ictal-interictal patterns, including electrographic seizures after moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury and to correlate continuous electroencephalography features with functional outcome.
DESIGN:Post hoc analysis of the prospective, randomized controlled phase 2 multicenter INTREPID study (ClinicalTrials.govNCT00805818). Continuous electroencephalography was initiated upon admission to the ICU. The primary outcome was the 3-month Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended. Consensus electroencephalography reviews were performed by raters certified in standardized continuous electroencephalography terminology blinded to clinical data. Rhythmic, periodic, or ictal patterns were referred to as “ictal-interictal continuum”; severe ictal-interictal continuum was defined as greater than or equal to 1.5 Hz lateralized rhythmic delta activity or generalized periodic discharges and any lateralized periodic discharges or electrographic seizures.
SETTING:Twenty U.S. level I trauma centers.
PATIENTS:Patients with nonpenetrating traumatic brain injury and postresuscitation Glasgow Coma Scale score of 4–12 were included.
INTERVENTIONS:None.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS:Among 152 patients with continuous electroencephalography (age 34 ± 14 yr; 88% male), 22 (14%) had severe ictal-interictal continuum including electrographic seizures in four (2.6%). Severe ictal-interictal continuum burden correlated with initial prognostic scores, including the International Mission for Prognosis and Analysis of Clinical Trials in Traumatic Brain Injury (r = 0.51; p = 0.01) and Injury Severity Score (r = 0.49; p = 0.01), but not with functional outcome. After controlling clinical covariates, unfavorable outcome was independently associated with absence of posterior dominant rhythm (common odds ratio, 3.38; 95% CI, 1.30–9.09), absence of N2 sleep transients (3.69; 1.69–8.20), predominant delta activity (2.82; 1.32–6.10), and discontinuous background (5.33; 2.28–12.96) within the first 72 hours of monitoring.
CONCLUSIONS:Severe ictal-interictal continuum patterns, including electrographic seizures, were associated with clinical markers of injury severity but not functional outcome in this prospective cohort of patients with moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury. Importantly, continuous electroencephalography background features were independently associated with functional outcome and improved the area under the curve of existing, validated predictive models. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 Frank C. Tortella: Randomized controlled trial design and data acquisition Jed A Hartings: Study design, manuscript draft and critical revisions Laura B. Ngwenya: Study design, manuscript draft and critical revisions Hyunjo Lee: EEG analysis, data analysis and interpretation, manuscript draft and revisions, figure creation Brian D. Moseley: EEG review, manuscript review Sameer Sharma: Manuscript draft and critical revisions Brandon Foreman: Study design, study concept, EEG review and oversight, data analysis and interpretation, manuscript draft and critical revisions Moshe A. Mizrahi: Study design, EEG review and oversight, manuscript draft and critical revisions Laura Pahren: EEG review, study design, manuscript review Michael Privitera: Study concept, study design, EEG review and oversight, manuscript draft and critical revisions Author Contributions |
ISSN: | 0090-3493 1530-0293 |
DOI: | 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003639 |