FLI1 gene influences lesion size and skin test may predict therapeutic response in cutaneous leishmaniasis

Genes associated with wound healing have been shown to be risk factors for cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) which is caused by Leishmania braziliensis. In this study, we examined whether the genes previously associated with CL influenced the clinical outcome. Patients were genotyped and retrospectively...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz Vol. 115; p. e190361
Main Authors: da Hora, Anadilton Santos, de Almeida, Lucas Frederico, do Lago, Tainã Souza, Machado, Paulo Roberto, Castellucci, Léa Cristina
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Brazil Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, Ministério da Saúde 01-01-2020
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Genes associated with wound healing have been shown to be risk factors for cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) which is caused by Leishmania braziliensis. In this study, we examined whether the genes previously associated with CL influenced the clinical outcome. Patients were genotyped and retrospectively classified as responders, who were cured with a single course of pentavalent antimony (Sbv), or as refractories, who did not respond to Sbv. Patients characterised as responders showed a stronger response to the leishmanin skin test (LST) when compared to the refractory subjects (p = 0.0003). Furthermore, we observed an association between the FLI1 CC genotype and an increased size of ulcers (p = 0.0170). We suggest that the leishmanin skin test may be a predictive tool for therapeutic outcome and reinforce FLI1 as a potential influencer of susceptibility and lesion size in CL.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
AUTHORS’ CONTRIBUTION: ASH, LFA and TSL performed the preparation of the samples, genotyping, and collection of the clinical data; PRM participated in the medical care of the patients and reviewed the final version of the manuscript; LCC supervised the laboratory work and undertook the responsibility of data interpretation and preparation of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. The authors declare that they have no commercial or financial relationships that may cause a potential conflict of interest.
ISSN:0074-0276
1678-8060
1678-8060
DOI:10.1590/0074-02760190361