Useful pharmacological parameters for G-protein-coupled receptor homodimers obtained from competition experiments. Agonist–antagonist binding modulation

Dimer receptor models can account for changes in the shape of competition curves that cannot be explained by monomer receptor models. Radiolabelled antagonist versus agonist binding to dopamine D 1 receptors. Many G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are expressed on the plasma membrane as dimers. Si...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Biochemical pharmacology Vol. 78; no. 12; pp. 1456 - 1463
Main Authors: Casadó, Vicent, Ferrada, Carla, Bonaventura, Jordi, Gracia, Eduard, Mallol, Josefa, Canela, Enric I., Lluís, Carmen, Cortés, Antoni, Franco, Rafael
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Amsterdam Elsevier Inc 15-12-2009
Elsevier
Elsevier B.V
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Dimer receptor models can account for changes in the shape of competition curves that cannot be explained by monomer receptor models. Radiolabelled antagonist versus agonist binding to dopamine D 1 receptors. Many G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are expressed on the plasma membrane as dimers. Since drug binding data are currently fitted using equations developed for monomeric receptors, the interpretation of the pharmacological data are equivocal in many cases. As reported here, GPCR dimer models account for changes in competition curve shape as a function of the radioligand concentration used, something that cannot be explained by monomeric receptor models. Macroscopic equilibrium dissociation constants for the agonist and homotropic cooperativity index reflecting the intramolecular communication within the dopamine D 1 or adenosine A 2A receptor homodimer as well as hybrid equilibrium dissociation constant, which reflects the antagonist/agonist modulation may be calculated by fitting binding data from antagonist/agonist competition experiments to equations developed from dimer receptor models. Comparing fitting the data by assuming a classical monomeric receptor model or a dimer model, it is shown that dimer receptor models provide more clues useful in drug discovery than monomer-based models.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0006-2952
1873-2968
DOI:10.1016/j.bcp.2009.07.012