A distant evolutionary relationship between bacterial sphingomyelinase and mammalian DNase I

• Published in: Protein science Vol. 5; no. 12; pp. 2459 - 2467
• Main Authors: Matsuo, Yo, Yamada, Atsuko, Tsukamoto, Kikuo, Tamura, Hiro‐Omi, Ikezawa, Hiroh, Nakamura, Haruki, Nishikawa, Ken
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Bristol Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press 01-12-1996
• Subjects: Amino Acid Sequence; Animals; Bacteria - enzymology; bacterial sphingomyelinase; Deoxyribonuclease I - genetics; DNase I; Evolution, Molecular; evolutionary relationship; Mammals; Molecular Sequence Data; Mutagenesis, Site-Directed; Sequence Alignment; Sequence Analysis; site‐directed mutagenesis; Sphingomyelin Phosphodiesterase - genetics; structure prediction
• DOI: 10.1002/pro.5560051208
• EISSN: 1469-896X
• ISSN: 0961-8368

The three‐dimensional structure of bacterial sphingomyelinase (SMase) was predicted using a protein fold recognition method; the search of a library of known structures showed that the SMase sequence is highly compatible with the mammalian DNase I structure, which suggested that SMase adopts a structure similar to that of DNase I. The amino acid sequence alignment based on the prediction revealed that, despite the lack of overall sequence similarity (less than 10% identity), those residues of DNase I that are involved in the hydrolysis of the phosphodiester bond, including two histidine residues (His 134 and His 252) of the active center, are conserved in SMase. In addition, a conserved pentapeptide sequence motif was found, which includes two catalytically critical residues, Asp 251 and His 252. A sequence database search showed that the motif is highly specific to mammalian DNase I and bacterial SMase. The functional roles of SMase residues identified by the sequence comparison were consistent with the results from mutant studies. Two Bacillus cereus SMase mutants (H134A and H252A) were constructed by site‐directed mutagenesis. They completely abolished their catalytic activity. A model for the SMase‐sphingomyelin complex structure was built to investigate how the SMase specifically recognizes its substrate. The model suggested that a set of residues conserved among bacterial SMases, including Trp 28 and Phe 55, might be important in the substrate recognition. The predicted structural similarity and the conservation of the functionally important residues strongly suggest a distant evolutionary relationship between bacterial SMase and mammalian DNase I. These two phosphodiesterases must have acquired the specificity for different substrates in the course of evolution.