Psychiatric Hospitalization: Reasons for Admission and Alternatives to Admission in South Auckland, New Zealand

Objective: To describe reasons for admission and alternatives to admission in a government funded acute inpatient unit. Method: Reasons for admission and alternatives to admission were rated for a consecutive sample of 255 admissions to an acute psychiatric unit in Auckland, using interviews with st...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry Vol. 37; no. 5; pp. 620 - 625
Main Authors: Abas, Melanie, Vanderpyl, Jane, Le Prou, Trix, Kydd, Rob, Emery, Brian, Alo Foliaki, Siale
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: London, England SAGE Publications 01-10-2003
Blackwell Science Pty
Informa
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Objective: To describe reasons for admission and alternatives to admission in a government funded acute inpatient unit. Method: Reasons for admission and alternatives to admission were rated for a consecutive sample of 255 admissions to an acute psychiatric unit in Auckland, using interviews with staff and case note review. Result: Most patients had a functional psychosis and were admitted involuntarily. Forty percent came from areas of marked social deprivation. The major reasons for admission were for reinstatement of medication (mainly linked to non-concordance with prescribed medication), intensive observation, risk to self and risk to others. Only 12% of admissions could have been diverted, of whom most would have required daily home treatment. For those still admitted at 5 weeks, 26% could have been discharged, mainly to 24 h nurse-staffed accommodation. If the alternatives had all been available, simulated bed-day savings were 11 bed years per year. Simulated bed day savings were greater through implementing early discharge than by diverting new admissions. Conclusion: Greater availability of assertive community treatment and of interventions to improve medication concordance may have prevented a small number of admissions. For patients admitted longer than 5 weeks, it appeared that greater availability of 24 h nursestaffed accommodation would have allowed considerable bed-day savings.
Bibliography:Rob Kydd, Head
Mental Health Service, Counties Manukau District Health Board, Auckland, New Zealand. Email
School of Medicine, University of Auckland, New Zealand
Mabas@btinternet.com
Refs; tables
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0004-8674
1440-1614
DOI:10.1046/j.1440-1614.2003.01229.x