The age of Phobos and its largest crater, Stickney
We derived crater production functions and chronology functions of Phobos for two scenarios, which likely represent the end-members of its dynamical evolution. Case A assumes that Phobos has been in its current orbit about Mars since its formation. Case B assumes a recent capture of Phobos and the i...
Saved in:
Published in: | Planetary and space science Vol. 102; pp. 152 - 163 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier Ltd
01-11-2014
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | We derived crater production functions and chronology functions of Phobos for two scenarios, which likely represent the end-members of its dynamical evolution. Case A assumes that Phobos has been in its current orbit about Mars since its formation. Case B assumes a recent capture of Phobos and the impact history of an average Main Belt Asteroid. We determined the age of an average surface to the west of the Stickney crater and of the interior of the Stickney crater. The results indicate (i) the formation or major collision of Phobos about 4.3Ga (Case A) or 3.5Ga (Case B) ago, (ii) the Stickney crater is about 4.2Ga (Case A) or 2.6Ga (Case B) old and (iii) grooves probably formed between 3.1 and 3.8Ga (Case A) or 44 and 340Ma (Case B). Thus, Stickney seems to be older than the investigated grooves on Phobos.
•Chronologies for two end-member cases of Phobos׳ history developed.•Phobos׳ oldest surface formed about 4.3/3.5Ga (Case A/Case B) ago.•Crater Stickney is ancient and about 4.2/2.6Ga (Case A/Case B) old.•Grooves on Phobos are ancient but developed probably at various times. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0032-0633 1873-5088 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.pss.2014.04.009 |