Medical Multimedia Retrieval 2.0
Objectives: The objective of this article is to provide an overview of current trends in medical multimedia retrieval. This state of the art is then compared with trends and techniques in the Web 2.0 field that addresses several of the problems of current multimedia retrieval and may help in solving...
Saved in:
Published in: | Yearbook of medical informatics Vol. 17; no. 1; pp. 55 - 63 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Stuttgart
Schattauer Verlag für Medizin und Naturwissenschaften
2008
Georg Thieme Verlag KG |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Abstract | Objectives: The objective of this article is to provide an overview of current trends in medical multimedia retrieval. This state of the art is then compared with trends and techniques in the Web 2.0 field that addresses several of the problems of current multimedia retrieval and may help in solving them. Methods: The article uses a review of the current literature on medical imaging and medical multimedia retrieval from the Pubmed and Google scholar literature search engines. Other sources include popular Web 2.0 web pages and articles on Web 2.0 describing the main concepts of these technologies in the medical domain. Results: Web 2.0 has significantly changed the way we interact with the Internet and has created an important added-value by promoting activities of users and interactions between users. In the medical field, there are many examples of adoption of these methods and multimedia retrieval can play an important role in this field by supplying the right data at the right time. Conclusions: Medical multimedia retrieval still has a long way to go to become an everyday tool in the medical field and in clinical practice. Still, when reusing and linking much of the electronic patient record’s data, image retrieval can be a technology to help extract important knowledge and navigate through the large amounts of data. Key challenges for more widespread adoption of these technologies involve legal rules for secondary use of medical data because currently only very few image data sets with ground truth have been made available.with |
---|---|
AbstractList | OBJECTIVESThe objective of this article is to provide an overview of current trends in medical multimedia retrieval. This state of the art is then compared with trends and techniques in the Web 2.0 field that addresses several of the problems of current multimedia retrieval and may help in solving them.METHODSThe article uses a review of the current literature on medical imaging and medical multimedia retrieval from the Pubmed and Google scholar literature search engines. Other sources include popular Web 2.0 web pages and articles on Web 2.0 describing the main concepts of these technologies in the medical domain.RESULTSWeb 2.0 has significantly changed the way we interact with the Internet and has created an important added-value by promoting activities of users and interactions between users. In the medical field, there are many examples of adoption of these methods and multimedia retrieval can play an important role in this field by supplying the right data at the right time.CONCLUSIONSMedical multimedia retrieval still has a long way to go to become an everyday tool in the medical field and in clinical practice. Still, when reusing and linking much of the electronic patient record's data, image retrieval can be a technology to help extract important knowledge and navigate through the large amounts of data. Key challenges for more widespread adoption of these technologies involve legal rules for secondary use of medical data because currently only very few image data sets with ground truth have been made available. Objectives The objective of this article is to provide an overview of current trends in medical multimedia retrieval. This state of the art is then compared with trends and techniques in the Web 2.0 field that addresses several of the problems of current multimedia retrieval and may help in solving them. MethodsThe article uses a review of the current literature on medical imaging and medical multimedia retrieval from the Pubmed and Google scholar literature search engines. Other sources include popular Web 2.0 web pages and articles on Web 2.0 describing the main concepts of these technologies in the medical domain. Results Web 2.0 has significantly changed the way we interact with the Internet and has created an important added-value by promoting activities of users and interactions between users. In the medical field, there are many examples of adoption of these methods and multimedia retrieval can play an important role in this field by supplying the right data at the right time. Conclusions Medical multimedia retrieval still has a long way to go to become an everyday tool in the medical field and in clinical practice. Still, when reusing and linking much of the electronic patient record’s data, image retrieval can be a technology to help extract important knowledge and navigate through the large amounts of data. Key challenges for more widespread adoption of these technologies involve legal rules for secondary use of medical data because currently only very few image data sets with ground truth have been made available. Objectives: The objective of this article is to provide an overview of current trends in medical multimedia retrieval. This state of the art is then compared with trends and techniques in the Web 2.0 field that addresses several of the problems of current multimedia retrieval and may help in solving them. Methods: The article uses a review of the current literature on medical imaging and medical multimedia retrieval from the Pubmed and Google scholar literature search engines. Other sources include popular Web 2.0 web pages and articles on Web 2.0 describing the main concepts of these technologies in the medical domain. Results: Web 2.0 has significantly changed the way we interact with the Internet and has created an important added-value by promoting activities of users and interactions between users. In the medical field, there are many examples of adoption of these methods and multimedia retrieval can play an important role in this field by supplying the right data at the right time. Conclusions: Medical multimedia retrieval still has a long way to go to become an everyday tool in the medical field and in clinical practice. Still, when reusing and linking much of the electronic patient record’s data, image retrieval can be a technology to help extract important knowledge and navigate through the large amounts of data. Key challenges for more widespread adoption of these technologies involve legal rules for secondary use of medical data because currently only very few image data sets with ground truth have been made available.with The objective of this article is to provide an overview of current trends in medical multimedia retrieval. This state of the art is then compared with trends and techniques in the Web 2.0 field that addresses several of the problems of current multimedia retrieval and may help in solving them. The article uses a review of the current literature on medical imaging and medical multimedia retrieval from the Pubmed and Google scholar literature search engines. Other sources include popular Web 2.0 web pages and articles on Web 2.0 describing the main concepts of these technologies in the medical domain. Web 2.0 has significantly changed the way we interact with the Internet and has created an important added-value by promoting activities of users and interactions between users. In the medical field, there are many examples of adoption of these methods and multimedia retrieval can play an important role in this field by supplying the right data at the right time. Medical multimedia retrieval still has a long way to go to become an everyday tool in the medical field and in clinical practice. Still, when reusing and linking much of the electronic patient record's data, image retrieval can be a technology to help extract important knowledge and navigate through the large amounts of data. Key challenges for more widespread adoption of these technologies involve legal rules for secondary use of medical data because currently only very few image data sets with ground truth have been made available. Summary Objectives The objective of this article is to provide an overview of current trends in medical multimedia retrieval. This state of the art is then compared with trends and techniques in the Web 2.0 field that addresses several of the problems of current multimedia retrieval and may help in solving them. Methods The article uses a review of the current literature on medical imaging and medical multimedia retrieval from the Pubmed and Google scholar literature search engines. Other sources include popular Web 2.0 web pages and articles on Web 2.0 describing the main concepts of these technologies in the medical domain. Results Web 2.0 has significantly changed the way we interact with the Internet and has created an important added-value by promoting activities of users and interactions between users. In the medical field, there are many examples of adoption of these methods and multimedia retrieval can play an important role in this field by supplying the right data at the right time. Conclusions Medical multimedia retrieval still has a long way to go to become an everyday tool in the medical field and in clinical practice. Still, when reusing and linking much of the electronic patient record’s data, image retrieval can be a technology to help extract important knowledge and navigate through the large amounts of data. Key challenges for more widespread adoption of these technologies involve legal rules for secondary use of medical data because currently only very few image data sets with ground truth have been made available. |
Author | C. Paton H. Müller P. J. Murray P. D. Bamidis M. Cabrer W. S. Erdley C. Paton P. L. Elkin G.Eysenbach Y. Amghar M. Hansen M. Cabrer R. Chbeir A. Flory |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 fullname: H. Müller P. J. Murray – sequence: 2 fullname: M. Cabrer – sequence: 3 fullname: M. Hansen – sequence: 4 fullname: C. Paton – sequence: 5 fullname: P. L. Elkin – sequence: 6 fullname: W. S. Erdley C. Paton – sequence: 7 fullname: P. D. Bamidis – sequence: 8 fullname: G.Eysenbach – sequence: 9 fullname: M. Cabrer R. Chbeir – sequence: 10 fullname: Y. Amghar – sequence: 11 fullname: A. Flory |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18660877$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNqVkDlLBDEYQIMouh6tpWxlN2vuoxTxAhdB7D9iJmGic6zJjOK_N7KLgmBhmpCPlwff20fb_dB7hI4JXhAsxFmuMGa6IpJpofkWmlEmeYUFpttohg1nFVdc7aGjnJ9xOZIQTtUu2iNaSqyVmqH50tfR2Xa-nNoxduVh5w9-TNG_lSFd4EO0E2yb_dHmPkCPV5ePFzfV3f317cX5XeW4MbzSVJjacG1qrIkQjFEenOVBWaIpVgrrIIzEQQZFCSahJkHVghsirNWUsgN0utau0vA6-TxCF7PzbWt7P0wZpGGCaKMLuFiDLg05Jx9glWJn0wcQDF9VIMNXFdhUKR9ONubpqez3g28aFKBaA2MTfefheZhSX1b9W7hc89k1dhzt5NO3NHbRwoe36WkYXsAm18Q3DzHnyUNeeRdtC53tp-xSXI1gShv2XfSfPkqF_C2D3Azv0Ixdyz4BxZ-nGA |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1007_s10278_011_9428_4 crossref_primary_10_4137_CIN_S14053 crossref_primary_10_2974_kmj_59_25 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
DBID | CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM AAYXX CITATION 7X8 |
DOI | 10.1055/s-0038-1638584 |
DatabaseName | Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed CrossRef MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitle | MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) CrossRef MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic CrossRef MEDLINE |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: ECM name: MEDLINE url: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=cmedm&site=ehost-live sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine |
EISSN | 2364-0502 |
EndPage | 63 |
ExternalDocumentID | 10_1055_s_0038_1638584 18660877 imia_yearbook_archive_issue_2256_manuscript_9820_show_html |
Genre | Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Journal Article Review |
GroupedDBID | - 0R 0U6 53G ABFLS ACGFS ADACO AKOSD ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS DIK EBS EJD F5P H13 HYE O9- RPM RTC RTE --- 0R~ OK1 CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM AAYXX CITATION 7X8 |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c4994-8259d9489d081553324fca4f7a18207708f5960f6f72101fd1f7d54915aa8223 |
ISSN | 0943-4747 |
IngestDate | Thu Apr 11 20:24:58 EDT 2024 Thu Nov 21 22:20:09 EST 2024 Tue Aug 27 13:50:12 EDT 2024 Sun Nov 24 15:09:07 EST 2024 Tue Jan 05 23:20:10 EST 2021 Sat Jun 01 03:59:44 EDT 2019 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | false |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | false |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 1 |
Keywords | visual information search Web 2.0 Medical image retrieval medical multimedia data |
Language | English |
LinkModel | OpenURL |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c4994-8259d9489d081553324fca4f7a18207708f5960f6f72101fd1f7d54915aa8223 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-3 content type line 23 ObjectType-Review-1 |
OpenAccessLink | http://www.thieme-connect.de/products/ejournals/pdf/10.1055/s-0038-1638584.pdf |
PMID | 18660877 |
PQID | 69351898 |
PQPubID | 23479 |
PageCount | 9 |
ParticipantIDs | pubmed_primary_18660877 crossref_primary_10_1055_s_0038_1638584 schattauer_primary_imia_yearbook_archive_issue_special_manuscript_9820 proquest_miscellaneous_69351898 thieme_journals_10_1055_s_0038_1638584 schattauer_primary_imia_yearbook_archive_issue_2256_manuscript_9820_show_html |
ProviderPackageCode | RTE |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2008-00-00 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2008-01-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – year: 2008 text: 2008-00-00 |
PublicationDecade | 2000 |
PublicationPlace | Stuttgart |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Stuttgart – name: Germany |
PublicationTitle | Yearbook of medical informatics |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Yearb Med Inform |
PublicationYear | 2008 |
Publisher | Schattauer Verlag für Medizin und Naturwissenschaften Georg Thieme Verlag KG |
Publisher_xml | – name: Schattauer Verlag für Medizin und Naturwissenschaften – name: Georg Thieme Verlag KG |
SSID | ssj0000611427 |
Score | 1.7377489 |
SecondaryResourceType | review_article |
Snippet | Objectives: The objective of this article is to provide an overview of current trends in medical multimedia retrieval. This state of the art is then compared... Summary Objectives The objective of this article is to provide an overview of current trends in medical multimedia retrieval. This state of the art is then... The objective of this article is to provide an overview of current trends in medical multimedia retrieval. This state of the art is then compared with trends... Objectives The objective of this article is to provide an overview of current trends in medical multimedia retrieval. This state of the art is then compared... OBJECTIVESThe objective of this article is to provide an overview of current trends in medical multimedia retrieval. This state of the art is then compared... |
SourceID | proquest crossref pubmed thieme schattauer |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Publisher Enrichment Source |
StartPage | 55 |
SubjectTerms | Diagnostic Imaging - trends Information Storage and Retrieval - trends Internet - trends Medical Image Retrieval medical multimedia data Multimedia - trends Original Article PubMed visual information search Web 2.0 |
Title | Medical Multimedia Retrieval 2.0 |
URI | http://www.schattauer.de/en/magazine/subject-areas/journals-a-z/imia-yearbook/archive/issue/2256/manuscript/9820/show.html http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1638584 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18660877 https://search.proquest.com/docview/69351898 |
Volume | 17 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://sdu.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV3Pj5QwFH5x18Towfhb_MnB6GGDCwyFctTdmYxxZz2IyXpqSimZSRxms0A2_ve-RwvMuDG6By-ElKTQfvT1a9_r9wDecK3CJC4jL4_i3CMC7_G8yD0mVczCSHMZ0Gnk-dfk9IwfT8l73md3Hcv-K9JYhljTydlroD1UigV4j5jjFVHH6z_h3nteukjB7lzIwUWXNQtfchC-97fZ6HdsPLHswcneKXBYGjtGwS_Im_7xqD80ON_ZKdgyaxQ-6EWJ0ba0psqo49pJzxiZK-bUZ6Q8UXvkP_SIuTGTz21Xt_r0i5h9OzkR2fQs24ObIQ55yiVx_OnzsNuFrCGITP7c_lN6BU3GDndfsMsQrtD-OzjPqqVsGtl2vKFZrvRab5GC7B7ctWze_WBguA83dPUAbi1svMJDcC0a7oiGO6DhIhqPIJtNs6O5Z3NSeCoiFWVcUKdFGvG0QC7FkCuHUalkVCaSlPCTxOclw0VhGZe4tPaDsgjKpMA1eMCkRC42eQz71abST8HNqbEqKJJwomgdS6rQKvUVZ6UMtAoceNd3gzg3yiOiixhgTNQk6cqF7TAHXve9JNA4kMdHVnrT1iJOJyzgKXfgiem8sSYex6QF6cBi7M3h6Wq9kuKn_QeFNBrIorMEAieAWKxl1ZppTaTYblEvN5di2ax_ODC7Zn10ohgH3-9VOvDWICvs4Kr_0Ppnf239c7htonxo4-wF7DcXrX4Je3XRvur-0l9SN3Sn |
link.rule.ids | 315,782,786,4028,27932,27933,27934 |
linkProvider | Flying Publisher |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Medical+multimedia+retrieval+2.0&rft.jtitle=Yearbook+of+medical+informatics&rft.au=M%C3%BCller%2C+H&rft.date=2008&rft.issn=0943-4747&rft.spage=55&rft.epage=63&rft_id=info:doi/10.1055%2Fs-0038-1638584&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT |
thumbnail_s | http://sdu.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/image/custom?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.schattauer.de%2Fuploads%2Ftx_schattauermagazine%2Fmagazine-issue%2Fcover-2256.jpg |