Medical Multimedia Retrieval 2.0

Objectives: The objective of this article is to provide an overview of current trends in medical multimedia retrieval. This state of the art is then compared with trends and techniques in the Web 2.0 field that addresses several of the problems of current multimedia retrieval and may help in solving...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Yearbook of medical informatics Vol. 17; no. 1; pp. 55 - 63
Main Authors: H. Müller P. J. Murray, M. Cabrer, M. Hansen, C. Paton, P. L. Elkin, W. S. Erdley C. Paton, P. D. Bamidis, G.Eysenbach, M. Cabrer R. Chbeir, Y. Amghar, A. Flory
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Stuttgart Schattauer Verlag für Medizin und Naturwissenschaften 2008
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Abstract Objectives: The objective of this article is to provide an overview of current trends in medical multimedia retrieval. This state of the art is then compared with trends and techniques in the Web 2.0 field that addresses several of the problems of current multimedia retrieval and may help in solving them. Methods: The article uses a review of the current literature on medical imaging and medical multimedia retrieval from the Pubmed and Google scholar literature search engines. Other sources include popular Web 2.0 web pages and articles on Web 2.0 describing the main concepts of these technologies in the medical domain. Results: Web 2.0 has significantly changed the way we interact with the Internet and has created an important added-value by promoting activities of users and interactions between users. In the medical field, there are many examples of adoption of these methods and multimedia retrieval can play an important role in this field by supplying the right data at the right time. Conclusions: Medical multimedia retrieval still has a long way to go to become an everyday tool in the medical field and in clinical practice. Still, when reusing and linking much of the electronic patient record’s data, image retrieval can be a technology to help extract important knowledge and navigate through the large amounts of data. Key challenges for more widespread adoption of these technologies involve legal rules for secondary use of medical data because currently only very few image data sets with ground truth have been made available.with
AbstractList OBJECTIVESThe objective of this article is to provide an overview of current trends in medical multimedia retrieval. This state of the art is then compared with trends and techniques in the Web 2.0 field that addresses several of the problems of current multimedia retrieval and may help in solving them.METHODSThe article uses a review of the current literature on medical imaging and medical multimedia retrieval from the Pubmed and Google scholar literature search engines. Other sources include popular Web 2.0 web pages and articles on Web 2.0 describing the main concepts of these technologies in the medical domain.RESULTSWeb 2.0 has significantly changed the way we interact with the Internet and has created an important added-value by promoting activities of users and interactions between users. In the medical field, there are many examples of adoption of these methods and multimedia retrieval can play an important role in this field by supplying the right data at the right time.CONCLUSIONSMedical multimedia retrieval still has a long way to go to become an everyday tool in the medical field and in clinical practice. Still, when reusing and linking much of the electronic patient record's data, image retrieval can be a technology to help extract important knowledge and navigate through the large amounts of data. Key challenges for more widespread adoption of these technologies involve legal rules for secondary use of medical data because currently only very few image data sets with ground truth have been made available.
Objectives The objective of this article is to provide an overview of current trends in medical multimedia retrieval. This state of the art is then compared with trends and techniques in the Web 2.0 field that addresses several of the problems of current multimedia retrieval and may help in solving them. MethodsThe article uses a review of the current literature on medical imaging and medical multimedia retrieval from the Pubmed and Google scholar literature search engines. Other sources include popular Web 2.0 web pages and articles on Web 2.0 describing the main concepts of these technologies in the medical domain. Results Web 2.0 has significantly changed the way we interact with the Internet and has created an important added-value by promoting activities of users and interactions between users. In the medical field, there are many examples of adoption of these methods and multimedia retrieval can play an important role in this field by supplying the right data at the right time. Conclusions Medical multimedia retrieval still has a long way to go to become an everyday tool in the medical field and in clinical practice. Still, when reusing and linking much of the electronic patient record’s data, image retrieval can be a technology to help extract important knowledge and navigate through the large amounts of data. Key challenges for more widespread adoption of these technologies involve legal rules for secondary use of medical data because currently only very few image data sets with ground truth have been made available.
Objectives: The objective of this article is to provide an overview of current trends in medical multimedia retrieval. This state of the art is then compared with trends and techniques in the Web 2.0 field that addresses several of the problems of current multimedia retrieval and may help in solving them. Methods: The article uses a review of the current literature on medical imaging and medical multimedia retrieval from the Pubmed and Google scholar literature search engines. Other sources include popular Web 2.0 web pages and articles on Web 2.0 describing the main concepts of these technologies in the medical domain. Results: Web 2.0 has significantly changed the way we interact with the Internet and has created an important added-value by promoting activities of users and interactions between users. In the medical field, there are many examples of adoption of these methods and multimedia retrieval can play an important role in this field by supplying the right data at the right time. Conclusions: Medical multimedia retrieval still has a long way to go to become an everyday tool in the medical field and in clinical practice. Still, when reusing and linking much of the electronic patient record’s data, image retrieval can be a technology to help extract important knowledge and navigate through the large amounts of data. Key challenges for more widespread adoption of these technologies involve legal rules for secondary use of medical data because currently only very few image data sets with ground truth have been made available.with
The objective of this article is to provide an overview of current trends in medical multimedia retrieval. This state of the art is then compared with trends and techniques in the Web 2.0 field that addresses several of the problems of current multimedia retrieval and may help in solving them. The article uses a review of the current literature on medical imaging and medical multimedia retrieval from the Pubmed and Google scholar literature search engines. Other sources include popular Web 2.0 web pages and articles on Web 2.0 describing the main concepts of these technologies in the medical domain. Web 2.0 has significantly changed the way we interact with the Internet and has created an important added-value by promoting activities of users and interactions between users. In the medical field, there are many examples of adoption of these methods and multimedia retrieval can play an important role in this field by supplying the right data at the right time. Medical multimedia retrieval still has a long way to go to become an everyday tool in the medical field and in clinical practice. Still, when reusing and linking much of the electronic patient record's data, image retrieval can be a technology to help extract important knowledge and navigate through the large amounts of data. Key challenges for more widespread adoption of these technologies involve legal rules for secondary use of medical data because currently only very few image data sets with ground truth have been made available.
Summary Objectives The objective of this article is to provide an overview of current trends in medical multimedia retrieval. This state of the art is then compared with trends and techniques in the Web 2.0 field that addresses several of the problems of current multimedia retrieval and may help in solving them. Methods The article uses a review of the current literature on medical imaging and medical multimedia retrieval from the Pubmed and Google scholar literature search engines. Other sources include popular Web 2.0 web pages and articles on Web 2.0 describing the main concepts of these technologies in the medical domain. Results Web 2.0 has significantly changed the way we interact with the Internet and has created an important added-value by promoting activities of users and interactions between users. In the medical field, there are many examples of adoption of these methods and multimedia retrieval can play an important role in this field by supplying the right data at the right time. Conclusions Medical multimedia retrieval still has a long way to go to become an everyday tool in the medical field and in clinical practice. Still, when reusing and linking much of the electronic patient record’s data, image retrieval can be a technology to help extract important knowledge and navigate through the large amounts of data. Key challenges for more widespread adoption of these technologies involve legal rules for secondary use of medical data because currently only very few image data sets with ground truth have been made available.
Author C. Paton
H. Müller P. J. Murray
P. D. Bamidis
M. Cabrer
W. S. Erdley C. Paton
P. L. Elkin
G.Eysenbach
Y. Amghar
M. Hansen
M. Cabrer R. Chbeir
A. Flory
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  fullname: H. Müller P. J. Murray
– sequence: 2
  fullname: M. Cabrer
– sequence: 3
  fullname: M. Hansen
– sequence: 4
  fullname: C. Paton
– sequence: 5
  fullname: P. L. Elkin
– sequence: 6
  fullname: W. S. Erdley C. Paton
– sequence: 7
  fullname: P. D. Bamidis
– sequence: 8
  fullname: G.Eysenbach
– sequence: 9
  fullname: M. Cabrer R. Chbeir
– sequence: 10
  fullname: Y. Amghar
– sequence: 11
  fullname: A. Flory
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18660877$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNqVkDlLBDEYQIMouh6tpWxlN2vuoxTxAhdB7D9iJmGic6zJjOK_N7KLgmBhmpCPlwff20fb_dB7hI4JXhAsxFmuMGa6IpJpofkWmlEmeYUFpttohg1nFVdc7aGjnJ9xOZIQTtUu2iNaSqyVmqH50tfR2Xa-nNoxduVh5w9-TNG_lSFd4EO0E2yb_dHmPkCPV5ePFzfV3f317cX5XeW4MbzSVJjacG1qrIkQjFEenOVBWaIpVgrrIIzEQQZFCSahJkHVghsirNWUsgN0utau0vA6-TxCF7PzbWt7P0wZpGGCaKMLuFiDLg05Jx9glWJn0wcQDF9VIMNXFdhUKR9ONubpqez3g28aFKBaA2MTfefheZhSX1b9W7hc89k1dhzt5NO3NHbRwoe36WkYXsAm18Q3DzHnyUNeeRdtC53tp-xSXI1gShv2XfSfPkqF_C2D3Azv0Ixdyz4BxZ-nGA
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1007_s10278_011_9428_4
crossref_primary_10_4137_CIN_S14053
crossref_primary_10_2974_kmj_59_25
ContentType Journal Article
DBID CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
AAYXX
CITATION
7X8
DOI 10.1055/s-0038-1638584
DatabaseName Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
CrossRef
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
CrossRef
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE - Academic
CrossRef

MEDLINE

Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: ECM
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=cmedm&site=ehost-live
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 2364-0502
EndPage 63
ExternalDocumentID 10_1055_s_0038_1638584
18660877
imia_yearbook_archive_issue_2256_manuscript_9820_show_html
Genre Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Journal Article
Review
GroupedDBID -
0R
0U6
53G
ABFLS
ACGFS
ADACO
AKOSD
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
DIK
EBS
EJD
F5P
H13
HYE
O9-
RPM
RTC
RTE
---
0R~
OK1
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
AAYXX
CITATION
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c4994-8259d9489d081553324fca4f7a18207708f5960f6f72101fd1f7d54915aa8223
ISSN 0943-4747
IngestDate Thu Apr 11 20:24:58 EDT 2024
Thu Nov 21 22:20:09 EST 2024
Tue Aug 27 13:50:12 EDT 2024
Sun Nov 24 15:09:07 EST 2024
Tue Jan 05 23:20:10 EST 2021
Sat Jun 01 03:59:44 EDT 2019
IsDoiOpenAccess false
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed false
IsScholarly true
Issue 1
Keywords visual information search
Web 2.0
Medical image retrieval
medical multimedia data
Language English
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c4994-8259d9489d081553324fca4f7a18207708f5960f6f72101fd1f7d54915aa8223
Notes ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ObjectType-Review-1
OpenAccessLink http://www.thieme-connect.de/products/ejournals/pdf/10.1055/s-0038-1638584.pdf
PMID 18660877
PQID 69351898
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 9
ParticipantIDs pubmed_primary_18660877
crossref_primary_10_1055_s_0038_1638584
schattauer_primary_imia_yearbook_archive_issue_special_manuscript_9820
proquest_miscellaneous_69351898
thieme_journals_10_1055_s_0038_1638584
schattauer_primary_imia_yearbook_archive_issue_2256_manuscript_9820_show_html
ProviderPackageCode RTE
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2008-00-00
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2008-01-01
PublicationDate_xml – year: 2008
  text: 2008-00-00
PublicationDecade 2000
PublicationPlace Stuttgart
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Stuttgart
– name: Germany
PublicationTitle Yearbook of medical informatics
PublicationTitleAlternate Yearb Med Inform
PublicationYear 2008
Publisher Schattauer Verlag für Medizin und Naturwissenschaften
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Publisher_xml – name: Schattauer Verlag für Medizin und Naturwissenschaften
– name: Georg Thieme Verlag KG
SSID ssj0000611427
Score 1.7377489
SecondaryResourceType review_article
Snippet Objectives: The objective of this article is to provide an overview of current trends in medical multimedia retrieval. This state of the art is then compared...
Summary Objectives The objective of this article is to provide an overview of current trends in medical multimedia retrieval. This state of the art is then...
The objective of this article is to provide an overview of current trends in medical multimedia retrieval. This state of the art is then compared with trends...
Objectives The objective of this article is to provide an overview of current trends in medical multimedia retrieval. This state of the art is then compared...
OBJECTIVESThe objective of this article is to provide an overview of current trends in medical multimedia retrieval. This state of the art is then compared...
SourceID proquest
crossref
pubmed
thieme
schattauer
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Publisher
Enrichment Source
StartPage 55
SubjectTerms Diagnostic Imaging - trends
Information Storage and Retrieval - trends
Internet - trends
Medical Image Retrieval
medical multimedia data
Multimedia - trends
Original Article
PubMed
visual information search
Web 2.0
Title Medical Multimedia Retrieval 2.0
URI http://www.schattauer.de/en/magazine/subject-areas/journals-a-z/imia-yearbook/archive/issue/2256/manuscript/9820/show.html
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1638584
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18660877
https://search.proquest.com/docview/69351898
Volume 17
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://sdu.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV3Pj5QwFH5x18Towfhb_MnB6GGDCwyFctTdmYxxZz2IyXpqSimZSRxms0A2_ve-RwvMuDG6By-ElKTQfvT1a9_r9wDecK3CJC4jL4_i3CMC7_G8yD0mVczCSHMZ0Gnk-dfk9IwfT8l73md3Hcv-K9JYhljTydlroD1UigV4j5jjFVHH6z_h3nteukjB7lzIwUWXNQtfchC-97fZ6HdsPLHswcneKXBYGjtGwS_Im_7xqD80ON_ZKdgyaxQ-6EWJ0ba0psqo49pJzxiZK-bUZ6Q8UXvkP_SIuTGTz21Xt_r0i5h9OzkR2fQs24ObIQ55yiVx_OnzsNuFrCGITP7c_lN6BU3GDndfsMsQrtD-OzjPqqVsGtl2vKFZrvRab5GC7B7ctWze_WBguA83dPUAbi1svMJDcC0a7oiGO6DhIhqPIJtNs6O5Z3NSeCoiFWVcUKdFGvG0QC7FkCuHUalkVCaSlPCTxOclw0VhGZe4tPaDsgjKpMA1eMCkRC42eQz71abST8HNqbEqKJJwomgdS6rQKvUVZ6UMtAoceNd3gzg3yiOiixhgTNQk6cqF7TAHXve9JNA4kMdHVnrT1iJOJyzgKXfgiem8sSYex6QF6cBi7M3h6Wq9kuKn_QeFNBrIorMEAieAWKxl1ZppTaTYblEvN5di2ax_ODC7Zn10ohgH3-9VOvDWICvs4Kr_0Ppnf239c7htonxo4-wF7DcXrX4Je3XRvur-0l9SN3Sn
link.rule.ids 315,782,786,4028,27932,27933,27934
linkProvider Flying Publisher
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Medical+multimedia+retrieval+2.0&rft.jtitle=Yearbook+of+medical+informatics&rft.au=M%C3%BCller%2C+H&rft.date=2008&rft.issn=0943-4747&rft.spage=55&rft.epage=63&rft_id=info:doi/10.1055%2Fs-0038-1638584&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT
thumbnail_s http://sdu.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/image/custom?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.schattauer.de%2Fuploads%2Ftx_schattauermagazine%2Fmagazine-issue%2Fcover-2256.jpg