The Relationship Between Perceived Corporate Social Responsibility and Employee-Related Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis

Although there is much research on the relationships of corporate social responsibility and employee-related outcomes, a systematic and quantitative integration of research findings is needed to substantiate and broaden our knowledge. A meta-analysis allows the comparison of the relations of differe...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Frontiers in psychology Vol. 12; p. 607108
Main Authors: Paruzel, Agnieszka, Klug, Hannah J. P., Maier, Günter W.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A 08-07-2021
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Although there is much research on the relationships of corporate social responsibility and employee-related outcomes, a systematic and quantitative integration of research findings is needed to substantiate and broaden our knowledge. A meta-analysis allows the comparison of the relations of different types of CSR on several different outcomes, for example to learn what type of CSR is most important to employees. From a theoretical perspective, social identity theory is the most prominent theoretical approach in CSR research, so we aim to investigate identification as a mediator of the relationship between CSR and employee-related outcomes in a meta-analytical mediation model. This meta-analysis synthesizes research findings on the relationship between employees' perception of CSR (people, planet, and profit) and employee-related outcomes (identification, engagement, organizational attractiveness, turnover (intentions), OCB, commitment, and job satisfaction), thereby distinguishing attitudes and behavior. A total of 143 studies ( N = 89,396) were included in the meta-analysis which was conducted according to the methods by Schmidt and Hunter (except of the meta-analytical structural equation model). Mean effect sizes for the relationship between CSR and employee-related attitudes and behaviors were medium-sized to large. For attitudes, the relationships were stronger than for behavior. For specific types of CSR, average effect sizes were large. Identification mediated the relation between CSR and commitment, job satisfaction, and OCB, respectively. Based on our results, we give recommendations concerning the design of CSR initiatives in a way that benefits employees.
Bibliography:content type line 23
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
This article was submitted to Organizational Psychology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology
Reviewed by: Talat Islam, University of the Punjab, Pakistan; Nathan Hartman, Illinois State University, United States
Edited by: Joseph M. Goodman, Illinois State University, United States
ISSN:1664-1078
1664-1078
DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.607108