Levetiracetam in spinal cord injury pain: a randomized controlled trial

Study design: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover, multicenter trial. A 1-week baseline period was followed by two treatment periods of 5 weeks duration with levetiracetam increased from 500 mg b.i.d. to a maximum of 1500 mg b.i.d. separated by a 1-week washout period. Objectiv...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Spinal cord Vol. 47; no. 12; pp. 861 - 867
Main Authors: Finnerup, N B, Grydehøj, J, Bing, J, Johannesen, I L, Biering-Sørensen, F, Sindrup, S H, Jensen, T S
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: London Nature Publishing Group UK 01-12-2009
Nature Publishing Group
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Study design: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover, multicenter trial. A 1-week baseline period was followed by two treatment periods of 5 weeks duration with levetiracetam increased from 500 mg b.i.d. to a maximum of 1500 mg b.i.d. separated by a 1-week washout period. Objectives: The objective of the study was primarily to evaluate the efficacy of the anticonvulsant levetiracetam in patients with spinal cord injury (SCI) at- and below-level pain and secondarily to evaluate the effect on spasm severity. Setting: Outpatients at two spinal cord units and a pain center. Methods: Patients were allowed to continue their usual pain treatment at a constant dose. The primary outcome measure was the change in median daily pain score (on a 0–10 point numeric rating scale) from 1-week baseline period to the last week of each treatment period. Secondary outcome measures included pain relief of at- and below-level pain, allodynia, spasms and spasticity. Results: A total of 36 patients with SCI at- and or below-level pain were enrolled. Of these, 24 patients completed the trial. We found no effect of levetiracetam on the primary ( P =0.46) or any of the secondary outcome measures. Only two patients continued levetiracetam treatment following the trial, and one patient was still in levetiracetam treatment at the 6-month follow-up. Levetiracetam was generally well tolerated with no serious adverse events. Conclusions: Levetiracetam does not relieve neuropathic pain or spasm severity following spinal cord injury.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-News-2
ObjectType-Feature-3
ISSN:1362-4393
1476-5624
DOI:10.1038/sc.2009.55