What do Brazilian health professionals know about the frailty syndrome? A cross-sectional study

• Published in: BMC geriatrics Vol. 22; no. 1; p. 232
• Main Authors: Mesquita, Wesley Dos Reis, Ricci, Natalia Aquaroni
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England BioMed Central Ltd 21-03-2022; BioMed Central; BMC
• Subjects: Adults; Aged; Aging; Brazil - epidemiology; Clinical medicine; Cross-Sectional Studies; Data collection; Frail Elderly; Frailty; Frailty - diagnosis; Frailty - epidemiology; Frailty - therapy; Genotype & phenotype; Geriatric Assessment; Geriatrics; Health care; Health Personnel; Health professionals; Humans; Identification and classification; Knowledge; Medical personnel; Older people; Phenotypes; Primary care; Public health; Questionnaires; Sociodemographics; Surveys; Training; Variables; Brazil; Frailty; Aged; Health professionals; Knowledge; Primary care
• ISSN: 1471-2318; 1471-2318
• DOI: 10.1186/s12877-022-02927-6

The growing care demand for frail older adults and those at risk of frailty in primary health care (PHC) requires professionals trained in the subject to promote adequate care. This study aimed to analyze the self-reported, theoretical and practical knowledge of PHC professionals about the frailty syndrome.
This is an observational cross-sectional study with a sample of 485 Brazilian health professionals (bachelor's degree) working in PHC with older adults. An electronic questionnaire was used to collect data on professional characteristics and self-reported, theoretical and practical knowledge concerning frailty phenotype. Agreement analysis between types of knowledge and multivariate logistic regression were performed to show the factors associated with knowledge about frailty.
Theoretical knowledge showed the worse result, with 87.5% of the professionals describing the syndrome incorrectly. Roughly half the professionals self-reported (52.6%) very little/no knowledge concerning the syndrome and demonstrated low practical knowledge (55.1%) when identifying clinical cases. There were misconceptions about the syndrome, like it is natural from the aging process (83.3%) and is synonymous with disability and comorbidity (51.2%). The majority of the professionals were unaware of instruments for assessing frailty (77.9%) and the phenotype criteria (68.2%). No agreement was observed between the types of knowledge. Professionals specialized in or who had taken training courses in older adult health were 6.1 and 2.7-fold more likely, respectively, to self-reported some knowledge on the frailty syndrome.
PHC professionals presented little knowledge on the frailty syndrome. Most professionals were unaware of the frailty definition, its assessments for diagnosis and evidence for its treatment. The lack of knowledge on frailty could affect the care provided to older adults in primary care.