An Investigation of the Effect of Water Additives on Broiler Growth and the Caecal Microbiota at Harvest

• Published in: Pathogens (Basel) Vol. 11; no. 8; p. 932
• Main Authors: Greene, Genevieve, Koolman, Leonard, Whyte, Paul, Burgess, Catherine M, Lynch, Helen, Coffey, Aidan, Lucey, Brigid, O'Connor, Lisa, Bolton, Declan
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Switzerland MDPI AG 18-08-2022; MDPI
• Subjects: Additives; Bacteria; Birds; broiler; broiler performance; Broilers (Poultry); Campylobacter; Developed countries; Discriminant analysis; Essential oils; Fatty acids; Foodborne pathogens; Gram-positive bacteria; Health aspects; medium-chain fatty acids; Microbiota; Microbiota (Symbiotic organisms); Oils & fats; Organic acids; rRNA 16S; water additives; Water intake; Water intakes; Ireland; caecal microbiota; broiler performance; medium-chain fatty acids; broiler; water additives; essential oils; organic acids
• ISSN: 2076-0817; 2076-0817
• DOI: 10.3390/pathogens11080932

Campylobacter is the most common foodborne pathogen in developed countries and most cases are associated with poultry. This study investigated the effect of three anti-Campylobacter water additives on broiler growth and on the caecal microbiota at harvest using 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing. Mixtures of organic acids (OA) and essential oils (EO) were administered to broilers for the entirety of the production cycle (35 d) and medium-chain fatty acids (MCFA) for 5 d immediately before harvest, under commercial conditions. Bird weight gain was significantly (p < 0.001) reduced in broilers receiving the OA and EO treatments. While this was most likely due to reduced water intake and corresponding lower feed consumption, changes to the caecal microbiota may also have contributed. Firmicutes made up over 75% of the bacteria regardless of sample type, while the minor phyla included Bacteroidetes, Actinobacteria, Melainabacteria, and Proteobacteria. There were no significant (p > 0.05) differences in the alpha diversity as measured using ACE, Chao1, and Shannon indices, except for control (water) versus MCFA and OA versus MCFA, using the Wilcox test. In contrast, there was a significant (p < 0.05) difference in beta diversity when the treated were compared to the untreated control and main flock samples, while linear discriminant analysis effect size (LeFSe) identified three OTUs that were present in the control but absent in the treated birds. It was concluded that the water additives tested adversely affected broiler performance, which may, at least in part, be due to changes in the caecal microbiota, assuming that the altered microbiota at day 35 is indicative of a change throughout the production cycle.