Effect of adductor-canal-blockade on established, severe post-operative pain after total knee arthroplasty: a randomised study

Background: In this proof‐of‐concept study, we investigated the effect of the predominantly sensory adductor‐canal‐blockade on established pain in the early post‐operative period after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). We hypothesised that the adductor‐canal‐blockade would reduce pain during flexion of...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica Vol. 56; no. 8; pp. 1013 - 1019
Main Authors: JÆGER, P., GREVSTAD, U., HENNINGSEN, M. H., GOTTSCHAU, B., MATHIESEN, O., DAHL, J. B.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Oxford Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01-09-2012
Blackwell
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background: In this proof‐of‐concept study, we investigated the effect of the predominantly sensory adductor‐canal‐blockade on established pain in the early post‐operative period after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). We hypothesised that the adductor‐canal‐blockade would reduce pain during flexion of the knee (primary end point) and at rest, as well as reducing morphine consumption and morphine‐related side effects (secondary outcomes) compared with placebo. Methods: We enrolled patients scheduled for elective TKA into this double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, randomised study. During general anaesthesia, we placed a catheter in the adductor canal, and after obtaining pre‐block pain scores 30 min post‐operatively, we injected 30 ml of ropivacaine 0.75% (n = 21) or saline (n = 20) according to randomisation. Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01261897. Results: Forty‐two patients were randomised, and 41 were analysed. Mean (standard deviation) pain scores during flexion of the knee at 1 h post‐operatively were 58 (22) mm and 67 (29) mm, ropivacaine and placebo group, respectively (P = 0.23) but was significantly reduced in the ropivacaine group when calculated as area under the curve for the interval 1–6 h (P = 0.02). There were no statistically significant differences regarding pain at rest (P = 0.08), morphine consumption (P = 0.06), nor morphine‐related side effects, apart from nausea (P = 0.04). Conclusion: This proof‐of‐concept study shows promising results regarding the analgesic efficacy of adductor‐canal‐blockade in post‐operative pain treatment after TKA, with a significant reduction in pain during flexion of the knee in the early post‐operative period compared with placebo. However, the study was not sufficiently powered to permit final conclusions.
Bibliography:ark:/67375/WNG-JN7JBS9G-G
ArticleID:AAS2737
istex:7F1E16B42B207B83067557528ED42F329F100198
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-News-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ISSN:0001-5172
1399-6576
DOI:10.1111/j.1399-6576.2012.02737.x