Depot medroxyprogesterone acetate and epithelial ovarian cancer: a multicentre case-control study

Please cite this paper as: Wilailak S, Vipupinyo C, Suraseranivong V, Chotivanich K, Kietpeerakool C, Tanapat Y, Therasakvichya S, Hamontri S, Linasmita V, Bunyapipat S, Chindavijak S, Ittiwisavakul K, Khemapech N, Suekwattana P, Thanapprapasr D, Lumbiganon P. Depot medroxyprogesterone acetate and e...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology Vol. 119; no. 6; pp. 672 - 677
Main Authors: Wilailak, S, Vipupinyo, C, Suraseranivong, V, Chotivanich, K, Kietpeerakool, C, Tanapat, Y, Therasakvichya, S, Hamontri, S, Linasmita, V, Bunyapipat, S, Chindavijak, S, Ittiwisavakul, K, Khemapech, N, Suekwattana, P, Thanapprapasr, D, Lumbiganon, P
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01-05-2012
Blackwell
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Please cite this paper as: Wilailak S, Vipupinyo C, Suraseranivong V, Chotivanich K, Kietpeerakool C, Tanapat Y, Therasakvichya S, Hamontri S, Linasmita V, Bunyapipat S, Chindavijak S, Ittiwisavakul K, Khemapech N, Suekwattana P, Thanapprapasr D, Lumbiganon P. Depot medroxyprogesterone acetate and epithelial ovarian cancer: a multicentre case–control study. BJOG 2012;119:672–677. Objective  To evaluate the effect of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) in protecting against epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) and to evaluate factors associated with the risk of EOC. Design  A multicentre, case–control study. Setting  Twelve hospitals located across Thailand. Population  Three hundred and thirty patients with EOC (‘cases’) and 982 matched controls were recruited from the 12 hospitals. Cases were newly diagnosed patients with EOC, demonstrated pathologically. Controls were age‐matched patients admitted to different wards in the same hospital. Methods  Cases and controls were interviewed by trained interviewers using a standardised pre‐tested questionnaire. The factors associated with EOC were evaluated using univariate and multivariate analyses. Main outcome measures  The odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were calculated to assess the relationship between DMPA and EOC. Results  The use of DMPA was found to be associated with a 39% reduction in the risk of EOC with an OR of 0.61 and a 95% CI of 0.44–0.85 (P = 0.002). A significant risk reduction (83%) was observed when the duration of DMPA use was >3 years (OR 0.17; 95% CI 0.07–0.39; P < 0.001). Other factors associated with a reduced risk of EOC were the use of combined oral contraceptive pills and breastfeeding. A factor associated with an increased risk of EOC was a family history of gynaecological cancer. Conclusions  The results suggest that DMPA may have a protective effect against EOC. If this effect is real, then it represents an important non‐contraceptive benefit of DMPA.
Bibliography:ark:/67375/WNG-8MM67HH7-W
istex:CE3630D05DEE15E16B1A9093476AE692F0B3655E
ArticleID:BJO3298
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1470-0328
1471-0528
DOI:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2012.03298.x