Preprocedural ultrasound assessment does not improve trainee performance of spinal anesthesia for obstetrical patients: a randomized controlled trial

• Published in: Journal of clinical anesthesia Vol. 37; pp. 21 - 24
• Main Authors: Turkstra, Timothy P., MD, MEng, FRCPC, Marmai, Kristine L., MD, FRCPC, Armstrong, Kevin P., MD, FRCPC, Kumar, Kamal, MD, Singh, S. Indu, MD, FRCPC
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Elsevier Inc 01-02-2017; Elsevier Limited
• Subjects: Adult; Anesthesia; Anesthesia & Perioperative Care; Anesthesia, Obstetrical - adverse effects; Anesthesia, Obstetrical - methods; Anesthesia, Spinal - adverse effects; Anesthesia, Spinal - methods; Anesthesiologists - education; Catheterization - methods; Catheters; Cesarean section; Cesarean Section - adverse effects; Clinical trials; Elective Surgical Procedures - adverse effects; Epidural; Female; Humans; Internship and Residency; Male; Medical personnel; Nerve Block - adverse effects; Nerve Block - methods; Obstetrics; Pain Medicine; Patients; Pregnancy; Preoperative Care - methods; Prospective Studies; Regional anesthesia; Spinal anesthetic; Trainees; Ultrasonic imaging; Ultrasonography, Interventional; Ultrasound; Trainees; Spinal anesthetic; Obstetrics; Ultrasound
• ISSN: 0952-8180; 1873-4529
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2016.10.034

Abstract Study objective This randomized controlled trial was designed to evaluate the efficacy of additional information from preprocedure ultrasound examination to aid anesthesiology trainees performing spinal anesthesia for obstetric patients. Design Trainee residents were randomly allocated to landmark technique and anatomy demonstration via ultrasound examination or landmark technique only for spinal anesthetic placement. Setting Obstetric delivery suite. Patients Eighty healthy obstetric patients undergoing elective cesarean delivery. Intervention Ultrasound examination prior to spinal anesthetic placement. Measurements The primary outcome was the number of attempts for the spinal anesthetic. Secondary outcomes included placement duration; block height; and the incidence of need for staff intervention, paresthesia, and bloody tap. Subjective ease of placement was rated on a 100-mm visual analog scale. Main results Baseline demographic data were similar between the patient groups. The median number of attempts with preprocedure ultrasound and landmark was 3 (interquartile range, 2-7). This was not significantly different from the number of attempts with landmark technique only of 3 (1-60) ( P = .69). The median duration of spinal placement with ultrasound and landmark was 92 (51-140) seconds vs 75 (53-126) seconds with landmark only ( P = .57). There was no statistical difference between the groups in spinal placement duration, need for staff intervention, paresthesia, bloody tap, lumbar interspace, or block height. There was no difference in subjective ease of spinal placement by the resident. Conclusions In this study of junior anesthesia trainees performing obstetrical spinal anesthesia with preprocedure ultrasound and landmark technique or landmark technique only, no significant difference was observed in the number of attempts, duration of spinal placement, subjective ease of spinal placement, or any other measured secondary outcome.