Comparison of Azathioprine and Mycophenolate Mofetil for the Prevention of Acute Rejection in Recipients of Pancreas Transplantation

The study was performed to compare the efficacy and side effects of azathioprine (AZA) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in conjunction with cyclosporine or tacrolimus and steroids for the prevention of acute pancreas rejection during the first 6 months of pancreas transplantation. In this case‐contro...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of clinical pharmacology Vol. 41; no. 8; pp. 861 - 869
Main Authors: Oh, Jung M., Wiland, Anne M., Klassen, David K., Weidle, Paul J., Bartlett, Stephen T.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01-08-2001
SAGE Publications
Sage Science
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The study was performed to compare the efficacy and side effects of azathioprine (AZA) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in conjunction with cyclosporine or tacrolimus and steroids for the prevention of acute pancreas rejection during the first 6 months of pancreas transplantation. In this case‐controlled study, MMF is compared with historical controls of AZA in the prevention of acute pancreas rejection. The primary measures of treatment efficacy were patient and pancreas survival rate at 6 months after transplantation. Secondary efficacy measures were the occurrence of biopsyproven pancreas rejections and the use of antilymphocyte preparations for rejection treatment. A total of 111 pancreas transplant patients (57 in the AZA group and 54 in the MMF group) were evaluated. The 6‐month patient survival rate was 96% in the AZA group versus 97% in the MMF group (p = 0.57). The 6‐month pancreas graft survival rate was 88% in the AZA group versus 91% in the MMF group (p = 0.29). However, biopsy‐proven rejection episodes during the first 6 months of transplantation were significantly lower with MMF (46%) than with AZA (69%) (p = 0.01). In addition, patients in the AZA group received a greater number of full courses of antilymphocyte therapy as a rejection treatment (p = 0.004). Overall, the frequency of adverse events was similar, although the MMF group experienced higher incidences of gastrointestinal adverse events. In conclusion, compared with AZA, MMF significantly reduces the rate of biopsy‐proven pancreas rejection during the first 6 months of transplantation and is well tolerated, except for gastrointestinal adverse events.
Bibliography:istex:C35E7B93C10001B805D5EB244A0B2666488822DF
ark:/67375/WNG-J252HTQJ-B
ArticleID:JCPH1357
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0091-2700
1552-4604
DOI:10.1177/00912700122010762