Adaptive Treatment for Youth With Substance Use and Depression: Early Depression Response and Short-term Outcomes

To investigate prevalence and predictors of early depression response (EDR) in adolescents with substance use and depression receiving cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) for substance use and to test the efficacy of supplemental CBT targeting depression (CBT-D) for non-EDR adolescents in an adaptive...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Vol. 61; no. 4; pp. 508 - 519
Main Authors: Curry, John F., Kaminer, Yifrah, Goldston, David B., Chan, Grace, Wells, Karen C., Burke, Rebecca H., Inscoe, Adrienne Banny, Meyer, Allison E., Cheek, Shayna M.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: United States Elsevier Inc 01-04-2022
Elsevier BV
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:To investigate prevalence and predictors of early depression response (EDR) in adolescents with substance use and depression receiving cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) for substance use and to test the efficacy of supplemental CBT targeting depression (CBT-D) for non-EDR adolescents in an adaptive treatment approach. At 2 sites, 95 youths (ages 14–21, mean [SD] = 17.4 [1.8]) with alcohol or cannabis use and depressive symptoms received up to 12 sessions of CBT for substance use over 14 weeks. Assessments were at baseline and weeks 4, 9, and 14. The Children’s Depression Rating Scale–Revised was the primary depression measure, with a reduction of 50% or more on this scale at week 4 defining EDR. The primary substance use outcomes of alcohol use, heavy alcohol use, and cannabis use frequency were assessed via interview report on the Alcohol Consumption Questionnaire and the Drug Checklist. Urinalysis provided a secondary measure of cannabis use. Non-EDR adolescents were randomly assigned to supplemental CBT-D or enhanced treatment as usual (ETAU). Thirty-five adolescents (37%; 95% CI, 27%–47%) demonstrated EDR. Fewer days of cannabis use (odds ratio 0.977; 95% CI, 0.961–0.992) and absence of conduct disorder (odds ratio 0.149; 95% CI, 0.031–0.716) predicted EDR. Frequency of drinking (F1,82 = 11.09, η2 = 0.119, p = .001), heavy drinking (F1,82 = 19.91, η2 = 0.195, p < .0001), and cannabis use (F1,220 = 35.01, η2 = 0.137, p < .001) decreased over time for EDR, CBT-D, and ETAU adolescents, with EDR adolescents evidencing earlier lower cannabis use (F2,220 = 4.16, η2 = 0.036, p = .0169). Negative (clean) urine screens increased over time (F1,219 = 5.10, η2 = 0.023, p = .0249). Comparison of CBT-D and ETAU indicated that depression significantly decreased over time in both groups (F1,48 = 64.20, η2 = 0.572, p < .001), with no advantage for CBT-D. Approximately one-third of adolescents with substance use and depression attain EDR during substance use treatment. Less frequent cannabis use facilitates depression response. The relatively small sample may have precluded identification of additional EDR predictors. Treatment for Teens With Alcohol Abuse and Depression; https://clinicaltrials.gov/; NCT02227589.
Bibliography:Resources: Curry, Kaminer
Data curation: Burke, Inscoe, Meyer, Cheek
Writing – review and editing: Kaminer, Goldston, Chan, Wells, Burke, Inscoe, Meyer, Cheek
Writing – original draft: Curry
Validation: Kaminer, Goldston, Chan, Burke, Inscoe
Dr. Chan served as the statistical expert for this research.
Conceptualization: Curry, Kaminer, Goldston, Wells
Funding acquisition: Curry, Kaminer, Goldston, Wells
Methodology: Curry, Kaminer, Goldston, Wells, Burke, Meyer
Software: Chan
Project administration: Curry, Kaminer, Burke, Meyer, Cheek
Formal analysis: Curry, Kaminer, Goldston, Chan, Meyer
The authors are grateful to the participating adolescents and parents.
Supervision: Curry, Kaminer, Goldston, Wells
Author Contributions
Investigation: Kaminer, Goldston, Wells, Inscoe
ISSN:0890-8567
1527-5418
DOI:10.1016/j.jaac.2021.07.807