The hippocampus, spatial memory and food hoarding: a puzzle revisited

Behavioural ecology assumes that cognitive traits and their underlying neural substrates are shaped by natural selection in much the same way as morphological traits are, resulting in adaptation to the natural environment of the species concerned. Recently, however, the ‘neuroecology’ approach of at...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Trends in ecology & evolution (Amsterdam) Vol. 20; no. 1; pp. 17 - 22
Main Authors: Healy, Susan D., de Kort, Selvino R., Clayton, Nicola S.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Oxford Elsevier Ltd 2005
Elsevier
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Behavioural ecology assumes that cognitive traits and their underlying neural substrates are shaped by natural selection in much the same way as morphological traits are, resulting in adaptation to the natural environment of the species concerned. Recently, however, the ‘neuroecology’ approach of attempting to gain insight into brain structure and function by testing predictions about variation in brain structure based on knowledge of the lifestyle of the animal has been criticized on the grounds that such an adaptationist view cannot provide insight into the underlying mechanisms. Furthermore, the criticism has focussed on attempts to use variation in demand for spatial memory and in hippocampal size as a basis for predicting variation in cognitive abilities. Here, we revisit this critique against the field of so-called ‘neuroecology’ and argue that using knowledge of the natural history of animals has lead to a better understanding of the interspecific variation in spatial abilities and hippocampal size, and to the generation of novel hypotheses and predictions.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
ObjectType-Review-3
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ISSN:0169-5347
1872-8383
DOI:10.1016/j.tree.2004.10.006