Use of the Proboscis Extension Response Assay to Evaluate the Mechanism of House Fly Behavioral Resistance to Imidacloprid

• Published in: Insects (Basel, Switzerland) Vol. 15; no. 3; p. 168
• Main Authors: D'Arco, Sara, Maistrello, Lara, Hubbard, Caleb B, Murillo, Amy C, Gerry, Alec C
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Switzerland MDPI AG 01-03-2024; MDPI
• Subjects: Analysis; Assaying; aversion; Avoidance behavior; Behavior; chemoreception; Chemoreceptors; Contact; Dairy farms; discrimination; Esophagus; Females; Food; Housefly; Imidacloprid; insecticide; Insecticide resistance; Insecticides; Livestock; Musca domestica; Muscidae; Pest control; Pest resistance; Pests; Pharynx; Proboscis; Sucrose; Toothpicks; Italy; United States > US; aversion; insecticide; discrimination; chemoreception; Musca domestica
• ISSN: 2075-4450; 2075-4450
• DOI: 10.3390/insects15030168

The house fly,
L., is a significant human and livestock pest. Experiments used female adult house flies glued onto toothpicks for controlled exposure of their tarsi alone (tarsal assay) or their tarsi and proboscis (proboscis assay) with a sucrose solution containing imidacloprid at either a low (10 µg/mL) or high (4000 µg/mL) concentration. Proboscis extension response (PER) assays were used to characterize the response of imidacloprid-susceptible and behaviorally resistant house fly strains to contact with sucrose solutions containing either a low or high concentration of imidacloprid. In each assay, 150 female flies from each fly strain were individually exposed to sucrose solutions containing either a low or high concentration of imidacloprid by deliberate contact of the fly tarsi to the test solution. The PER for each fly was subsequently recorded at 0, 2, and 10 s following the initial tarsal contact. A significant and rapid reduction in PER was observed only for the behaviorally resistant fly strain and only following contact by the flies' proboscis with the sucrose solution containing the high imidacloprid concentration. The results suggest that chemoreceptors on the fly labellum or internally on the pharyngeal taste organs are involved in the detection of imidacloprid and discrimination of the concentration, resulting in an avoidance behavior (proboscis retraction) only when imidacloprid is at sufficient concentration. Further research is needed to identify the specific receptor(s) responsible for imidacloprid detection.