A Qualitative Examination of the Ward Region of Interest as Imaged on Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry Examinations: The “Wandering Ward Sign”

• Published in: Journal of clinical densitometry Vol. 19; no. 4; pp. 515 - 521
• Main Authors: Lentle, Brian, Hammond, Ian, Worsley, Dan, Colquhoun, Anita, Grochowski, Christa, Leggett, Jan, Gill, Sabrina
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Elsevier Inc 01-10-2016
• Subjects: Absorptiometry, Photon - instrumentation; Absorptiometry, Photon - methods; Absorptiometry, Photon - standards; Body Weight; Densitometry; Endocrinology & Metabolism; Femur - diagnostic imaging; Humans; Osteoporosis - diagnostic imaging; osteoporosis diagnosis; Patient Positioning; quality assurance; Quality Assurance, Health Care; Ward's area; Ward's triangle; Ward's triangle; Ward's area; Densitometry; osteoporosis diagnosis; quality assurance
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jocd.2016.03.006
• EISSN: 1559-0747
• ISSN: 1094-6950

Abstract While analyzing dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) examinations, we observed that, on occasion, the Ward region of interest (ROI) was positioned either unexpectedly or differently between successive examinations. When this occurred, it appeared to be either a marker of a compromised examination or of incident disease. This prompted a systematic inquiry. It became apparent that, while in general seeking the region of least areal density, the Ward ROI is positioned differently by the machines available to us from 2 particular manufacturers (General Electric Co. and Hologic Inc.). Three reviews were thus undertaken: (1) a prospective systematic examination of 200 unselected consecutive DXA examinations made with a General Electric Co. machine, 80 having had follow-up examinations and 245 made with a Hologic Inc. device; (2) a prospective systematic examination of 625 consecutive, unselected DXA examinations that were repeat examinations; and (3) a retrospective examination of a file of 86 cases collected for pedagogical purposes, predominantly made with a Hologic Inc. device. The commonest cause of an unusual position of the Ward area was compromised patient positioning or change in body habitus. Changes between examinations were, in addition if less often, apt to reflect physiological change or disease. Unusual positioning or a change in position of the Ward ROI is easily observed. It does not occur frequently, but, when it does, it may be useful in directing attention to either technical factors or incidental diseases. Observation of the position of the Ward ROI may thus be a quality assurance, and occasionally a diagnostic, tool.