Factors associated with breast cancer-specific distress in younger women participating in a family history mammography screening programme
This multi‐centre study examined factors associated with breast cancer‐specific distress in 2321 women under 50 who are on a mammographic screening programme on account of their family history. Women were recruited from 21 UK centres, and completed a questionnaire one month before their screening ap...
Saved in:
Published in: | Psycho-oncology (Chichester, England) Vol. 17; no. 1; pp. 74 - 82 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Chichester, UK
John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
01-01-2008
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | This multi‐centre study examined factors associated with breast cancer‐specific distress in 2321 women under 50 who are on a mammographic screening programme on account of their family history. Women were recruited from 21 UK centres, and completed a questionnaire one month before their screening appointment. The transactional theory of stress, appraisal, and coping provided the theoretical framework for the study. Factors measured included screening history, family history, perceived risk, cognitive appraisals, coping, optimism, and cancer worry. The findings indicate that the majority of women appraise their family history as being relevant and somewhat threatening to personal well‐being, but something they can deal with emotionally. Acceptance was the most commonly used coping strategy. Hierarchical regression analysis identified that the factors most significantly associated with distress were an appraisal of high relevance and threat, increased risk perception, low dispositional optimism, and the use of both avoidant and task‐orientated coping strategies. Women with children and those with relatives who have died from breast cancer were also more distressed. To conclude, most women appraised their situation positively but there is a potential profile of risk factors which may help clinicians identify those women who need extra psychological support as they progress through screening. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ArticleID:PON1201 ark:/67375/WNG-0TLB2WB0-X istex:54736361591293C4CEEF509EBD46618B3CC0D6B6 Cancer Research UK - No. C73/A2916 Other members of the PIMMS Management Group: Stephen Duffy, Wolfson College of Preventive Medicine, London, UK; Gareth Evans, Department of Clinical Genetics, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester, UK; Hilary Fielder, National Public Health Service of Wales, Wales, UK; Jonathon Gray, Institute of Medical Genetics, University Hospital of Wales, Wales, UK; James Mackay, Department of Biology, University College London, London, UK; Douglas Macmillan, Professorial Unit of Surgery, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK. ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 ObjectType-Article-2 ObjectType-Feature-1 |
ISSN: | 1057-9249 1099-1611 |
DOI: | 10.1002/pon.1201 |