Oceanic emissions of dimethyl sulfide and methanethiol and their contribution to sulfur dioxide production in the marine atmosphere
Oceanic emissions of dimethyl sulfide (CH.sub.3 SCH.sub.3, DMS) have long been recognized to impact aerosol particle composition and size, the concentration of cloud condensation nuclei (CCN), and Earth's radiation balance. The impact of oceanic emissions of methanethiol (CH.sub.3 SH, MeSH), wh...
Saved in:
| Published in: | Atmospheric chemistry and physics Vol. 22; no. 9; pp. 6309 - 6325 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Katlenburg-Lindau
Copernicus GmbH
17-05-2022
Copernicus Publications |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Abstract | Oceanic emissions of dimethyl sulfide (CH.sub.3 SCH.sub.3, DMS) have long been recognized to impact aerosol particle composition and size, the concentration of cloud condensation nuclei (CCN), and Earth's radiation balance. The impact of oceanic emissions of methanethiol (CH.sub.3 SH, MeSH), which is produced by the same oceanic precursor as DMS, on the volatile sulfur budget of the marine atmosphere is largely unconstrained. Here we present direct flux measurements of MeSH oceanic emissions using the eddy covariance (EC) method with a high-resolution proton-transfer-reaction time-of-flight mass spectrometer (PTR-ToFMS) detector and compare them to simultaneous flux measurements of DMS emissions from a coastal ocean site. Campaign mean mixing ratios of DMS and MeSH were 72 ppt (28-90 ppt interquartile range) and 19.1 ppt (7.6-24.5 ppt interquartile range), respectively. Campaign mean emission fluxes of DMS (F.sub.DMS) and MeSH (F.sub.MeSH) were 1.13 ppt m s.sup.-1 (0.53-1.61 ppt m s.sup.-1 interquartile range) and 0.21 ppt m s.sup.-1 (0.10-0.31 ppt m s.sup.-1 interquartile range), respectively. Linear least squares regression of observed MeSH and DMS flux indicates the emissions are highly correlated with each other (R.sup.2 =0.65) over the course of the campaign, consistent with a shared oceanic source. The campaign mean DMS to MeSH flux ratio (F.sub.DMS :F.sub.MeSH) was 5.5 ± 3.0, calculated from the ratio of 304 individual coincident measurements of F.sub.DMS and F.sub.MeSH . Measured F.sub.DMS :F.sub.MeSH was weakly correlated (R.sup.2 =0.15) with ocean chlorophyll concentrations, with F.sub.DMS :F.sub.MeSH reaching a maximum of 10.8 ± 4.4 during a phytoplankton bloom period. No other volatile sulfur compounds were observed by PTR-ToFMS to have a resolvable emission flux above their flux limit of detection or to have a gas-phase mixing ratio consistently above their limit of detection during the study period, suggesting DMS and MeSH are the dominant volatile organic sulfur compounds emitted from the ocean at this site. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | Oceanic emissions of dimethyl sulfide (CH3SCH3, DMS) have long been recognized to impact aerosol particle composition and size, the concentration of cloud condensation nuclei (CCN), and Earth's radiation balance. The impact of oceanic emissions of methanethiol (CH3SH, MeSH), which is produced by the same oceanic precursor as DMS, on the volatile sulfur budget of the marine atmosphere is largely unconstrained. Here we present direct flux measurements of MeSH oceanic emissions using the eddy covariance (EC) method with a high-resolution proton-transfer-reaction time-of-flight mass spectrometer (PTR-ToFMS) detector and compare them to simultaneous flux measurements of DMS emissions from a coastal ocean site. Campaign mean mixing ratios of DMS and MeSH were 72 ppt (28–90 ppt interquartile range) and 19.1 ppt (7.6–24.5 ppt interquartile range), respectively. Campaign mean emission fluxes of DMS (FDMS) and MeSH (FMeSH) were 1.13 ppt m s-1 (0.53–1.61 ppt m s-1 interquartile range) and 0.21 ppt m s-1 (0.10–0.31 ppt m s-1 interquartile range), respectively. Linear least squares regression of observed MeSH and DMS flux indicates the emissions are highly correlated with each other (R2=0.65) over the course of the campaign, consistent with a shared oceanic source. The campaign mean DMS to MeSH flux ratio (FDMS:FMeSH) was 5.5 ± 3.0, calculated from the ratio of 304 individual coincident measurements of FDMS and FMeSH. Measured FDMS:FMeSH was weakly correlated (R2=0.15) with ocean chlorophyll concentrations, with FDMS:FMeSH reaching a maximum of 10.8 ± 4.4 during a phytoplankton bloom period. No other volatile sulfur compounds were observed by PTR-ToFMS to have a resolvable emission flux above their flux limit of detection or to have a gas-phase mixing ratio consistently above their limit of detection during the study period, suggesting DMS and MeSH are the dominant volatile organic sulfur compounds emitted from the ocean at this site.The impact of this MeSH emission source on atmospheric budgets of sulfur dioxide (SO2) was evaluated by implementing observed emissions in a coupled ocean–atmosphere chemical box model using a newly compiled MeSH oxidation mechanism. Model results suggest that MeSH emissions lead to afternoon instantaneous SO2 production of 2.5 ppt h-1, which results in a 43 % increase in total SO2 production compared to a case where only DMS emissions are considered and accounts for 30% of the instantaneous SO2 production in the marine boundary layer at the mean measured FDMS and FMeSH. This contribution of MeSH to SO2 production is driven by a higher effective yield of SO2 from MeSH oxidation and the shorter oxidation lifetime of MeSH compared to DMS. This large additional source of marine SO2 has not been previously considered in global models of marine sulfur cycling. The field measurements and modeling results presented here demonstrate that MeSH is an important contributor to volatile sulfur budgets in the marine atmosphere and must be measured along with DMS in order to constrain marine sulfur budgets. This large additional source of marine–reduced sulfur from MeSH will contribute to particle formation and growth and CCN abundance in the marine atmosphere, with subsequent impacts on climate. Oceanic emissions of dimethyl sulfide (CH3SCH3, DMS) have long been recognized to impact aerosol particle composition and size, the concentration of cloud condensation nuclei (CCN), and Earth's radiation balance. The impact of oceanic emissions of methanethiol (CH3SH, MeSH), which is produced by the same oceanic precursor as DMS, on the volatile sulfur budget of the marine atmosphere is largely unconstrained. Here we present direct flux measurements of MeSH oceanic emissions using the eddy covariance (EC) method with a high-resolution proton-transfer-reaction time-of-flight mass spectrometer (PTR-ToFMS) detector and compare them to simultaneous flux measurements of DMS emissions from a coastal ocean site. Campaign mean mixing ratios of DMS and MeSH were 72 ppt (28–90 ppt interquartile range) and 19.1 ppt (7.6–24.5 ppt interquartile range), respectively. Campaign mean emission fluxes of DMS (FDMS) and MeSH (FMeSH) were 1.13 ppt m s−1 (0.53–1.61 ppt m s−1 interquartile range) and 0.21 ppt m s−1 (0.10–0.31 ppt m s−1 interquartile range), respectively. Linear least squares regression of observed MeSH and DMS flux indicates the emissions are highly correlated with each other (R2=0.65) over the course of the campaign, consistent with a shared oceanic source. The campaign mean DMS to MeSH flux ratio (FDMS:FMeSH) was 5.5 ± 3.0, calculated from the ratio of 304 individual coincident measurements of FDMS and FMeSH. Measured FDMS:FMeSH was weakly correlated (R2=0.15) with ocean chlorophyll concentrations, with FDMS:FMeSH reaching a maximum of 10.8 ± 4.4 during a phytoplankton bloom period. No other volatile sulfur compounds were observed by PTR-ToFMS to have a resolvable emission flux above their flux limit of detection or to have a gas-phase mixing ratio consistently above their limit of detection during the study period, suggesting DMS and MeSH are the dominant volatile organic sulfur compounds emitted from the ocean at this site. The impact of this MeSH emission source on atmospheric budgets of sulfur dioxide (SO2) was evaluated by implementing observed emissions in a coupled ocean–atmosphere chemical box model using a newly compiled MeSH oxidation mechanism. Model results suggest that MeSH emissions lead to afternoon instantaneous SO2 production of 2.5 ppt h−1, which results in a 43 % increase in total SO2 production compared to a case where only DMS emissions are considered and accounts for 30% of the instantaneous SO2 production in the marine boundary layer at the mean measured FDMS and FMeSH. This contribution of MeSH to SO2 production is driven by a higher effective yield of SO2 from MeSH oxidation and the shorter oxidation lifetime of MeSH compared to DMS. This large additional source of marine SO2 has not been previously considered in global models of marine sulfur cycling. The field measurements and modeling results presented here demonstrate that MeSH is an important contributor to volatile sulfur budgets in the marine atmosphere and must be measured along with DMS in order to constrain marine sulfur budgets. This large additional source of marine–reduced sulfur from MeSH will contribute to particle formation and growth and CCN abundance in the marine atmosphere, with subsequent impacts on climate. Oceanic emissions of dimethyl sulfide (CH 3 SCH 3 , DMS) have long been recognized to impact aerosol particle composition and size, the concentration of cloud condensation nuclei (CCN), and Earth's radiation balance. The impact of oceanic emissions of methanethiol (CH 3 SH, MeSH), which is produced by the same oceanic precursor as DMS, on the volatile sulfur budget of the marine atmosphere is largely unconstrained. Here we present direct flux measurements of MeSH oceanic emissions using the eddy covariance (EC) method with a high-resolution proton-transfer-reaction time-of-flight mass spectrometer (PTR-ToFMS) detector and compare them to simultaneous flux measurements of DMS emissions from a coastal ocean site. Campaign mean mixing ratios of DMS and MeSH were 72 ppt (28–90 ppt interquartile range) and 19.1 ppt (7.6–24.5 ppt interquartile range), respectively. Campaign mean emission fluxes of DMS ( FDMS ) and MeSH ( FMeSH ) were 1.13 ppt m s −1 (0.53–1.61 ppt m s −1 interquartile range) and 0.21 ppt m s −1 (0.10–0.31 ppt m s −1 interquartile range), respectively. Linear least squares regression of observed MeSH and DMS flux indicates the emissions are highly correlated with each other ( R2=0.65 ) over the course of the campaign, consistent with a shared oceanic source. The campaign mean DMS to MeSH flux ratio ( FDMS:FMeSH ) was 5.5 ± 3.0, calculated from the ratio of 304 individual coincident measurements of FDMS and FMeSH . Measured FDMS:FMeSH was weakly correlated ( R2=0.15 ) with ocean chlorophyll concentrations, with FDMS:FMeSH reaching a maximum of 10.8 ± 4.4 during a phytoplankton bloom period. No other volatile sulfur compounds were observed by PTR-ToFMS to have a resolvable emission flux above their flux limit of detection or to have a gas-phase mixing ratio consistently above their limit of detection during the study period, suggesting DMS and MeSH are the dominant volatile organic sulfur compounds emitted from the ocean at this site. The impact of this MeSH emission source on atmospheric budgets of sulfur dioxide (SO 2 ) was evaluated by implementing observed emissions in a coupled ocean–atmosphere chemical box model using a newly compiled MeSH oxidation mechanism. Model results suggest that MeSH emissions lead to afternoon instantaneous SO 2 production of 2.5 ppt h −1 , which results in a 43 % increase in total SO 2 production compared to a case where only DMS emissions are considered and accounts for 30% of the instantaneous SO 2 production in the marine boundary layer at the mean measured FDMS and FMeSH . This contribution of MeSH to SO 2 production is driven by a higher effective yield of SO 2 from MeSH oxidation and the shorter oxidation lifetime of MeSH compared to DMS. This large additional source of marine SO 2 has not been previously considered in global models of marine sulfur cycling. The field measurements and modeling results presented here demonstrate that MeSH is an important contributor to volatile sulfur budgets in the marine atmosphere and must be measured along with DMS in order to constrain marine sulfur budgets. This large additional source of marine–reduced sulfur from MeSH will contribute to particle formation and growth and CCN abundance in the marine atmosphere, with subsequent impacts on climate. Oceanic emissions of dimethyl sulfide (CH.sub.3 SCH.sub.3, DMS) have long been recognized to impact aerosol particle composition and size, the concentration of cloud condensation nuclei (CCN), and Earth's radiation balance. The impact of oceanic emissions of methanethiol (CH.sub.3 SH, MeSH), which is produced by the same oceanic precursor as DMS, on the volatile sulfur budget of the marine atmosphere is largely unconstrained. Here we present direct flux measurements of MeSH oceanic emissions using the eddy covariance (EC) method with a high-resolution proton-transfer-reaction time-of-flight mass spectrometer (PTR-ToFMS) detector and compare them to simultaneous flux measurements of DMS emissions from a coastal ocean site. Campaign mean mixing ratios of DMS and MeSH were 72 ppt (28-90 ppt interquartile range) and 19.1 ppt (7.6-24.5 ppt interquartile range), respectively. Campaign mean emission fluxes of DMS (F.sub.DMS) and MeSH (F.sub.MeSH) were 1.13 ppt m s.sup.-1 (0.53-1.61 ppt m s.sup.-1 interquartile range) and 0.21 ppt m s.sup.-1 (0.10-0.31 ppt m s.sup.-1 interquartile range), respectively. Linear least squares regression of observed MeSH and DMS flux indicates the emissions are highly correlated with each other (R.sup.2 =0.65) over the course of the campaign, consistent with a shared oceanic source. The campaign mean DMS to MeSH flux ratio (F.sub.DMS :F.sub.MeSH) was 5.5 ± 3.0, calculated from the ratio of 304 individual coincident measurements of F.sub.DMS and F.sub.MeSH . Measured F.sub.DMS :F.sub.MeSH was weakly correlated (R.sup.2 =0.15) with ocean chlorophyll concentrations, with F.sub.DMS :F.sub.MeSH reaching a maximum of 10.8 ± 4.4 during a phytoplankton bloom period. No other volatile sulfur compounds were observed by PTR-ToFMS to have a resolvable emission flux above their flux limit of detection or to have a gas-phase mixing ratio consistently above their limit of detection during the study period, suggesting DMS and MeSH are the dominant volatile organic sulfur compounds emitted from the ocean at this site. The impact of this MeSH emission source on atmospheric budgets of sulfur dioxide (SO.sub.2) was evaluated by implementing observed emissions in a coupled ocean-atmosphere chemical box model using a newly compiled MeSH oxidation mechanism. Model results suggest that MeSH emissions lead to afternoon instantaneous SO.sub.2 production of 2.5 ppt h.sup.-1, which results in a 43 % increase in total SO.sub.2 production compared to a case where only DMS emissions are considered and accounts for 30% of the instantaneous SO.sub.2 production in the marine boundary layer at the mean measured F.sub.DMS and F.sub.MeSH . This contribution of MeSH to SO.sub.2 production is driven by a higher effective yield of SO.sub.2 from MeSH oxidation and the shorter oxidation lifetime of MeSH compared to DMS. This large additional source of marine SO.sub.2 has not been previously considered in global models of marine sulfur cycling. The field measurements and modeling results presented here demonstrate that MeSH is an important contributor to volatile sulfur budgets in the marine atmosphere and must be measured along with DMS in order to constrain marine sulfur budgets. This large additional source of marine-reduced sulfur from MeSH will contribute to particle formation and growth and CCN abundance in the marine atmosphere, with subsequent impacts on climate. Oceanic emissions of dimethyl sulfide (CH.sub.3 SCH.sub.3, DMS) have long been recognized to impact aerosol particle composition and size, the concentration of cloud condensation nuclei (CCN), and Earth's radiation balance. The impact of oceanic emissions of methanethiol (CH.sub.3 SH, MeSH), which is produced by the same oceanic precursor as DMS, on the volatile sulfur budget of the marine atmosphere is largely unconstrained. Here we present direct flux measurements of MeSH oceanic emissions using the eddy covariance (EC) method with a high-resolution proton-transfer-reaction time-of-flight mass spectrometer (PTR-ToFMS) detector and compare them to simultaneous flux measurements of DMS emissions from a coastal ocean site. Campaign mean mixing ratios of DMS and MeSH were 72 ppt (28-90 ppt interquartile range) and 19.1 ppt (7.6-24.5 ppt interquartile range), respectively. Campaign mean emission fluxes of DMS (F.sub.DMS) and MeSH (F.sub.MeSH) were 1.13 ppt m s.sup.-1 (0.53-1.61 ppt m s.sup.-1 interquartile range) and 0.21 ppt m s.sup.-1 (0.10-0.31 ppt m s.sup.-1 interquartile range), respectively. Linear least squares regression of observed MeSH and DMS flux indicates the emissions are highly correlated with each other (R.sup.2 =0.65) over the course of the campaign, consistent with a shared oceanic source. The campaign mean DMS to MeSH flux ratio (F.sub.DMS :F.sub.MeSH) was 5.5 ± 3.0, calculated from the ratio of 304 individual coincident measurements of F.sub.DMS and F.sub.MeSH . Measured F.sub.DMS :F.sub.MeSH was weakly correlated (R.sup.2 =0.15) with ocean chlorophyll concentrations, with F.sub.DMS :F.sub.MeSH reaching a maximum of 10.8 ± 4.4 during a phytoplankton bloom period. No other volatile sulfur compounds were observed by PTR-ToFMS to have a resolvable emission flux above their flux limit of detection or to have a gas-phase mixing ratio consistently above their limit of detection during the study period, suggesting DMS and MeSH are the dominant volatile organic sulfur compounds emitted from the ocean at this site. |
| Audience | Academic |
| Author | Bertram, Timothy H Jernigan, Christopher M Vermeuel, Michael P Novak, Gordon A Kilgour, Delaney B |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 fullname: Novak, Gordon A – sequence: 2 fullname: Kilgour, Delaney B – sequence: 3 fullname: Jernigan, Christopher M – sequence: 4 fullname: Vermeuel, Michael P – sequence: 5 fullname: Bertram, Timothy H |
| BookMark | eNptUslqHDEQbYwDsR3ffWzwKYd2tHarj8ZkGTAYspxFaZvR0CNNJDXYZ_941DMhyUCQkETpvaeq0rtszkMMtmluMLrjeGQfQO87QrqeorEjiJCz5gL3AnUDJez8n_Pb5jLnLUKEI8wumtcnbSF43dqdz9nHkNvoWuN3tmxepjbPk_PGthBMu4Qg1MXH6RAoG-tTq2Moyau5VHJb4oEypyoRnxfmPkUz68OlDwul3UHyoUqWXcz7jU32XfPGwZTt9e_9qvnx6eP3hy_d49Pn1cP9Y6eZQKVzAyeIEQUWGEOMaq4NA4IG4QZmyWipM0IRhSiAFb0gruekx2ZQmrqe9vSqWR11TYSt3CdfM3mREbw8BGJaS0jF68nK5RFlNAY-OEbZCIqzYVRYgFEYcV61bo9atb6fs81FbuOcQk1fkr5n4zLHv6g1VFEfXCwJdO20lvcDYkhgwUhF3f0HVYepn1Lba52v8RPC-xPC8gX2uaxhzlmuvn09xaIjVqeYc7LuT-EYycU5sjpHEiIX58jFOfQX7NS5Aw |
| CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1021_acsearthspacechem_3c00209 crossref_primary_10_5194_acp_24_3729_2024 crossref_primary_10_1073_pnas_2307587120 crossref_primary_10_1021_acs_jpca_3c00558 crossref_primary_10_34133_olar_0027 crossref_primary_10_3390_oceans4020011 crossref_primary_10_1525_elementa_2023_00056 crossref_primary_10_5194_acp_23_6083_2023 crossref_primary_10_5194_bg_20_851_2023 crossref_primary_10_1021_acsestair_3c00112 crossref_primary_10_1021_acs_jpca_2c09095 crossref_primary_10_5194_acp_24_3379_2024 crossref_primary_10_5194_acp_24_4717_2024 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12040_024_02268_5 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2023_163021 crossref_primary_10_1021_acs_jpca_3c07775 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jes_2024_06_030 crossref_primary_10_1021_acs_jpca_3c04341 crossref_primary_10_3390_microorganisms10081581 crossref_primary_10_1021_acs_est_3c07120 |
| Cites_doi | 10.1038/nmicrobiol.2016.210 10.5194/acp-2021-891 10.1007/978-94-009-3027-8_12 10.1029/2003GL018956 10.1073/pnas.2110472118 10.1073/pnas.1606320113 10.1007/BF00115242 10.5194/gmd-9-3309-2016 10.1029/JD092iD11p13245 10.4319/lo.2000.45.4.0849 10.1021/jp511616j 10.5194/amt-4-1471-2011 10.1029/2001JD000843 10.1021/acs.accounts.0c00095 10.1029/97JD00695 10.5194/acp-8-887-2008 10.1002/kin.550230604 10.1016/S1385-1101(00)00023-X 10.1021/acs.analchem.8b02641 10.1016/j.agrformet.2012.09.006 10.5194/amt-9-1325-2016 10.1073/pnas.1306973110 10.1175/JAS3541.1 10.1038/247181a0 10.5194/acp-10-4611-2010 10.1029/97JD02987 10.1016/S0168-1176(97)00081-5 10.1038/329319a0 10.5194/acp-20-6081-2020 10.5194/amt-13-1887-2020 10.1029/2004GL021567 10.1016/0304-4203(96)00006-0 10.5194/acp-18-15291-2018 10.1007/BF00053934 10.1029/2004JD005462 10.1002/kin.21475 10.1021/cr020529+ 10.1016/j.earscirev.2016.06.005 10.1021/acs.jpclett.9b02567 10.1029/2000JD900236 10.1016/0168-1923(95)02248-1 10.5194/acp-14-3789-2014 10.1126/science.1180315 10.1039/c2cs35121h 10.1029/2000JD900252 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117833 10.1002/2017GL072975 10.1038/nature10580 10.1016/j.jes.2017.11.006 10.1021/j100349a006 10.1023/A:1018966204465 10.5194/acp-19-3981-2019 10.5194/acp-22-1601-2022 10.1029/2010GB003850 10.5194/acp-3-161-2003 10.1007/s10874-012-9215-8 10.1021/acs.accounts.7b00536 10.1016/0304-4203(90)90059-L 10.5194/bg-15-3497-2018 10.1021/acs.jpca.1c06900 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.02.043 10.5194/acp-20-3061-2020 10.1007/s10874-010-9155-0 10.1128/AEM.68.12.5804-5815.2002 10.5194/acp-6-1513-2006 10.1073/pnas.1919344117 10.1038/326655a0 10.1029/JC092iC03p02930 10.1007/s10874-010-9177-7 10.1126/science.aaf7796 10.1029/2006JD007293 10.5194/acp-9-8745-2009 10.1016/S1352-2310(96)00105-7 10.1016/S0016-7037(00)00399-9 10.1029/2000JD900630 10.1073/pnas.1318694111 10.1021/jp9914828 10.1021/acs.est.0c04323 10.1038/nature12674 |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| Copyright | COPYRIGHT 2022 Copernicus GmbH 2022. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. |
| Copyright_xml | – notice: COPYRIGHT 2022 Copernicus GmbH – notice: 2022. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. |
| DBID | AAYXX CITATION ISR 7QH 7TG 7TN 7UA 8FD 8FE 8FG ABUWG AFKRA ARAPS ATCPS AZQEC BENPR BFMQW BGLVJ BHPHI BKSAR C1K CCPQU DWQXO F1W GNUQQ H8D H96 HCIFZ KL. L.G L7M P5Z P62 PATMY PCBAR PIMPY PQEST PQQKQ PQUKI PYCSY DOA |
| DOI | 10.5194/acp-22-6309-2022 |
| DatabaseName | CrossRef Gale In Context: Science Aqualine Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts Oceanic Abstracts Water Resources Abstracts Technology Research Database ProQuest SciTech Collection ProQuest Technology Collection ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest Central Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Central Continental Europe Database Technology Collection Natural Science Collection Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management ProQuest One Community College ProQuest Central Korea ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts ProQuest Central Student Aerospace Database Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources SciTech Premium Collection Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection Environmental Science Database Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition Environmental Science Collection Directory of Open Access Journals |
| DatabaseTitle | CrossRef Publicly Available Content Database Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional ProQuest Central Student Technology Collection Technology Research Database ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) SciTech Premium Collection ProQuest One Community College Water Resources Abstracts Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection ProQuest Central Aerospace Database Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts Oceanic Abstracts Natural Science Collection ProQuest Central Korea Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database ProQuest Technology Collection Continental Europe Database ProQuest SciTech Collection Aqualine Environmental Science Collection Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts Environmental Science Database ProQuest One Academic Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic |
| DatabaseTitleList | Publicly Available Content Database CrossRef |
| Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: DOA name: Directory of Open Access Journals url: http://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website |
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Meteorology & Climatology |
| EISSN | 1680-7324 |
| EndPage | 6325 |
| ExternalDocumentID | oai_doaj_org_article_baeabdc1a57f4349ab5479b18adb1055 A704081842 10_5194_acp_22_6309_2022 |
| GroupedDBID | 23N 2WC 3V. 4P2 5GY 5VS 6J9 7XC 8FE 8FG 8FH 8R4 8R5 AAFWJ AAYXX ABUWG ACGFO ADBBV AENEX AFKRA AFPKN AFRAH AHGZY AIAGR ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ARAPS ATCPS BBORY BCNDV BENPR BFMQW BGLVJ BHPHI BKSAR BPHCQ CCPQU CITATION D1K E3Z EBS EDH EJD FD6 GROUPED_DOAJ GX1 H13 HCIFZ HH5 IAO IEA ISR ITC K6- KQ8 M~E OK1 P2P P62 PATMY PCBAR PIMPY PQQKQ PROAC PYCSY Q2X RIG RKB RNS TR2 XSB ~02 7QH 7TG 7TN 7UA 8FD AZQEC C1K DWQXO F1W GNUQQ H8D H96 KL. L.G L7M PQEST PQUKI |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-f752042baea44043c5cd4a2078f74e29e3fd8b2b03aae8682f65261d7bc3f6363 |
| IEDL.DBID | DOA |
| ISSN | 1680-7324 1680-7316 |
| IngestDate | Tue Oct 22 15:15:50 EDT 2024 Fri Nov 08 23:24:38 EST 2024 Tue Nov 19 21:02:56 EST 2024 Tue Nov 12 23:01:16 EST 2024 Thu Aug 01 19:53:16 EDT 2024 Fri Aug 23 01:21:30 EDT 2024 |
| IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
| IsOpenAccess | true |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Issue | 9 |
| Language | English |
| LinkModel | DirectLink |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c480t-f752042baea44043c5cd4a2078f74e29e3fd8b2b03aae8682f65261d7bc3f6363 |
| ORCID | 0000-0003-4009-039X 0000-0002-0435-9665 0000-0002-3026-7588 |
| OpenAccessLink | https://doaj.org/article/baeabdc1a57f4349ab5479b18adb1055 |
| PQID | 2664964969 |
| PQPubID | 105744 |
| PageCount | 17 |
| ParticipantIDs | doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_baeabdc1a57f4349ab5479b18adb1055 proquest_journals_2664964969 gale_infotracmisc_A704081842 gale_infotracacademiconefile_A704081842 gale_incontextgauss_ISR_A704081842 crossref_primary_10_5194_acp_22_6309_2022 |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | 2022-05-17 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2022-05-17 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 05 year: 2022 text: 2022-05-17 day: 17 |
| PublicationDecade | 2020 |
| PublicationPlace | Katlenburg-Lindau |
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Katlenburg-Lindau |
| PublicationTitle | Atmospheric chemistry and physics |
| PublicationYear | 2022 |
| Publisher | Copernicus GmbH Copernicus Publications |
| Publisher_xml | – name: Copernicus GmbH – name: Copernicus Publications |
| References | ref13 ref57 ref12 ref56 ref15 ref59 ref14 ref58 ref53 ref52 ref11 ref55 ref10 ref54 ref17 ref16 ref19 ref18 ref51 ref50 ref46 ref45 ref48 ref47 ref42 ref41 ref44 ref43 ref49 ref8 ref7 ref9 ref4 ref3 ref6 ref5 ref40 ref80 ref35 ref79 ref34 ref78 ref37 ref36 ref31 ref75 ref30 ref74 ref33 ref77 ref32 ref76 ref2 ref1 ref39 ref38 ref71 ref70 ref73 ref72 ref24 ref68 ref23 ref67 ref26 ref25 ref69 ref20 ref64 ref63 ref22 ref66 ref21 ref65 ref28 ref27 ref29 ref60 ref62 ref61 |
| References_xml | – ident: ref68 doi: 10.1038/nmicrobiol.2016.210 – ident: ref55 doi: 10.5194/acp-2021-891 – ident: ref67 doi: 10.1007/978-94-009-3027-8_12 – ident: ref60 doi: 10.1029/2003GL018956 – ident: ref54 doi: 10.1073/pnas.2110472118 – ident: ref27 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1606320113 – ident: ref7 doi: 10.1007/BF00115242 – ident: ref77 doi: 10.5194/gmd-9-3309-2016 – ident: ref9 doi: 10.1029/JD092iD11p13245 – ident: ref33 doi: 10.4319/lo.2000.45.4.0849 – ident: ref79 doi: 10.1021/jp511616j – ident: ref11 doi: 10.5194/amt-4-1471-2011 – ident: ref46 doi: 10.1029/2001JD000843 – ident: ref52 doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.0c00095 – ident: ref10 doi: 10.1029/97JD00695 – ident: ref62 doi: 10.5194/acp-8-887-2008 – ident: ref70 doi: 10.1002/kin.550230604 – ident: ref35 doi: 10.1016/S1385-1101(00)00023-X – ident: ref39 doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.8b02641 – ident: ref51 doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2012.09.006 – ident: ref56 doi: 10.5194/amt-9-1325-2016 – ident: ref64 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1306973110 – ident: ref22 doi: 10.1175/JAS3541.1 – ident: ref45 doi: 10.1038/247181a0 – ident: ref47 doi: 10.5194/acp-10-4611-2010 – ident: ref18 doi: 10.1029/97JD02987 – ident: ref76 doi: 10.1016/S0168-1176(97)00081-5 – ident: ref5 doi: 10.1038/329319a0 – ident: ref20 doi: 10.5194/acp-20-6081-2020 – ident: ref53 doi: 10.5194/amt-13-1887-2020 – ident: ref28 doi: 10.1029/2004GL021567 – ident: ref32 doi: 10.1016/0304-4203(96)00006-0 – ident: ref57 doi: 10.5194/acp-18-15291-2018 – ident: ref43 doi: 10.1007/BF00053934 – ident: ref2 doi: 10.1029/2004JD005462 – ident: ref13 doi: 10.1002/kin.21475 – ident: ref4 doi: 10.1021/cr020529+ – ident: ref44 doi: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2016.06.005 – ident: ref8 doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.9b02567 – ident: ref65 doi: 10.1029/2000JD900236 – ident: ref24 doi: 10.1016/0168-1923(95)02248-1 – ident: ref59 doi: 10.5194/acp-14-3789-2014 – ident: ref66 doi: 10.1126/science.1180315 – ident: ref14 doi: 10.1039/c2cs35121h – ident: ref30 doi: 10.1029/2000JD900252 – ident: ref48 doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117833 – ident: ref38 doi: 10.1002/2017GL072975 – ident: ref58 doi: 10.1038/nature10580 – ident: ref74 doi: 10.1016/j.jes.2017.11.006 – ident: ref69 doi: 10.1021/j100349a006 – ident: ref75 doi: 10.1023/A:1018966204465 – ident: ref73 doi: 10.5194/acp-19-3981-2019 – ident: ref36 doi: 10.5194/acp-22-1601-2022 – ident: ref41 doi: 10.1029/2010GB003850 – ident: ref63 doi: 10.5194/acp-3-161-2003 – ident: ref78 – ident: ref3 doi: 10.1007/s10874-012-9215-8 – ident: ref50 doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.7b00536 – ident: ref1 doi: 10.1016/0304-4203(90)90059-L – ident: ref25 doi: 10.5194/bg-15-3497-2018 – ident: ref17 doi: 10.1021/acs.jpca.1c06900 – ident: ref21 doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.02.043 – ident: ref42 doi: 10.5194/acp-20-3061-2020 – ident: ref23 doi: 10.1007/s10874-010-9155-0 – ident: ref80 doi: 10.1128/AEM.68.12.5804-5815.2002 – ident: ref61 doi: 10.5194/acp-6-1513-2006 – ident: ref71 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1919344117 – ident: ref16 doi: 10.1038/326655a0 – ident: ref6 doi: 10.1029/JC092iC03p02930 – ident: ref26 doi: 10.1007/s10874-010-9177-7 – ident: ref40 doi: 10.1126/science.aaf7796 – ident: ref49 doi: 10.1029/2006JD007293 – ident: ref19 doi: 10.5194/acp-9-8745-2009 – ident: ref29 doi: 10.1016/S1352-2310(96)00105-7 – ident: ref34 doi: 10.1016/S0016-7037(00)00399-9 – ident: ref31 doi: 10.1029/2000JD900630 – ident: ref37 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1318694111 – ident: ref12 doi: 10.1021/jp9914828 – ident: ref72 doi: 10.1021/acs.est.0c04323 – ident: ref15 doi: 10.1038/nature12674 |
| SSID | ssj0025014 |
| Score | 2.5229285 |
| Snippet | Oceanic emissions of dimethyl sulfide (CH3SCH3,
DMS) have long been recognized to impact aerosol particle composition and
size, the concentration of cloud... Oceanic emissions of dimethyl sulfide (CH.sub.3 SCH.sub.3, DMS) have long been recognized to impact aerosol particle composition and size, the concentration of... Oceanic emissions of dimethyl sulfide (CH3SCH3, DMS) have long been recognized to impact aerosol particle composition and size, the concentration of cloud... Oceanic emissions of dimethyl sulfide (CH 3 SCH 3 , DMS) have long been recognized to impact aerosol particle composition and size, the concentration of cloud... |
| SourceID | doaj proquest gale crossref |
| SourceType | Open Website Aggregation Database |
| StartPage | 6309 |
| SubjectTerms | Aerosols Air pollution Air-sea interaction Atmosphere Atmospheric models Blooms Boundary layers Budgets Chlorophyll Chlorophylls Cloud condensation nuclei Clouds Condensates Condensation nuclei Detection Dimethyl sulfide Eddy covariance Emission analysis Emission measurements Emissions Finite element method Fluctuations Laboratories Least squares method Mass spectrometry Methanethiol Mixing ratio Modelling Oceans Organosulfur compounds Oxidation Particle composition Particle formation Phytoplankton Phytoplankton bloom Protons Radiation Radiation balance Reaction time Sulfides Sulfur Sulfur budget Sulfur compounds Sulfur dioxide Sulfuric acid Sulphides Sulphur Sulphur dioxide |
| Title | Oceanic emissions of dimethyl sulfide and methanethiol and their contribution to sulfur dioxide production in the marine atmosphere |
| URI | https://www.proquest.com/docview/2664964969 https://doaj.org/article/baeabdc1a57f4349ab5479b18adb1055 |
| Volume | 22 |
| hasFullText | 1 |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| link | http://sdu.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV3Ni9UwEA-6Jy_iJz5dJYgoHsq2SZq0x3XdZT2o4Cp4C5MvKbxtH6-voGf_cWfSvoV3EC9CL81HPzKTZCaZ_H6MvXLoJYuMp10lXSjjSuxzaMhVqVYVkYeBoPPOl1fm0_fm_TnB5NxQfVFM2AwPPDfciYMILvgKapOUVC24WpnWVQ0ER-SOefQtm70ztbhatFtGrpZuyoK4meYNSrRW1An4TYEOmM5bC6UQBxNSxu3_2-icp5yLe-zuYivy0_kb77NbsX_AVh_RzB22eTWcv-Zn6w5tznz3kP3-7CP0nedE4kbLYCMfEg8d0UT_WvNxWqcuRA594JQEdCKnG9Y5Ie8Y8By5vlBg8d2Qq0xbfMTwk2puZnxYyux6qsKvgY4PcthdDyMhFMRH7NvF-dezy2JhWSi8aspdkUwtsOdSOxNWoPS1DwoEmg7JqCjaKFNonHClBIiNbkTSNbpdwTgvk5ZaPmZH_dDHJ4ybqJXTMmhIGoUkwERvfCt9lLrRLq3Y231T280MpmHRCSGxWBSLFcKSWCyJZcXekSxuyhEMdk5A5bCLcth_KceKvSRJWgK66CmS5gdM42g_XH2xpwaHL7RWFL7pzVIoDbsteFgOJuA_ETbWQcnjg5IoS3-YvVcYu4wEo0UDSLV0tU__xx89Y3eodSh-oTLH7Gi3neJzdnsM04vcA_4AsBEKyw |
| link.rule.ids | 315,782,786,866,2108,27935,27936 |
| linkProvider | Directory of Open Access Journals |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Oceanic+emissions+of+dimethyl+sulfide+and+methanethiol+and+their+contribution+to+sulfur+dioxide+production+in+the+marine+atmosphere&rft.jtitle=Atmospheric+chemistry+and+physics&rft.au=Novak%2C+Gordon+A&rft.au=Kilgour%2C+Delaney+B&rft.au=Jernigan%2C+Christopher+M&rft.au=Vermeuel%2C+Michael+P&rft.date=2022-05-17&rft.pub=Copernicus+GmbH&rft.issn=1680-7316&rft.eissn=1680-7324&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=6309&rft.epage=6325&rft_id=info:doi/10.5194%2Facp-22-6309-2022&rft.externalDBID=HAS_PDF_LINK |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1680-7324&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1680-7324&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1680-7324&client=summon |