Matrix effect in liquid chromatography–electrospray ionization mass spectrometry analysis of benzoxazinoid derivatives in plant material

• Published in: Journal of Chromatography A Vol. 1157; no. 1; pp. 108 - 114
• Main Authors: Villagrasa, M., Guillamón, M., Eljarrat, E., Barceló, D.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Amsterdam Elsevier B.V 20-07-2007; Elsevier
• Subjects: Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions; Allelochemicals; Benzoxazines - analysis; Benzoxazinoid derivatives; Benzoxazinones; Benzoxazolinones; Biological and medical sciences; Chemical constitution; Chromatography, Liquid - methods; Economic plant physiology; Electrospray ionization; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology; Ion suppression; ionization; LC–MS; leaves; liquid chromatography; mass spectrometry; Matrix effect; plant extracts; Plants - chemistry; Reference Standards; roots; Spectrometry, Mass, Electrospray Ionization - methods; Triticum aestivum; Wheat; Ion suppression; Benzoxazinoid derivatives; Benzoxazinones; Electrospray ionization; Benzoxazolinones; LC–MS; Matrix effect; Wheat; Allelochemicals; Monocotyledones; Chemical analysis; Lactam; HPLC chromatography; Organic carbamate; Electrospray; Cereal crop; Triticum; Gramineae; Angiospermae; Bicyclic compound; Aromatic compound; Oxygen nitrogen heterocycle; Below ground plant part; Benzoxazole derivatives; Root; Coupled method; Plant leaf; LC-MS; Spermatophyta; Mass spectrometry; Semiochemicals
• ISSN: 0021-9673
• DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2007.04.040

Despite the increasing success of liquid chromatography (LC) coupled to mass spectrometry (MS), matrix effects have limited the ESI applications. Matrix effects result from co-eluting residual matrix components affecting the ionization efficiency of target analytes and can lead to erroneous results. The present work evaluates the LC–electrospray ionization (ESI)-MS behaviour of benzoxazinoid derivatives in wheat plant material as a case where endogenous matrix components were found to interfere with the ionization of target analytes. When LC–MS was applied to the analysis of foliage and root extracts, significant signal suppressions were observed. To compensate for this matrix signal suppression, different methods were applied: the use of internal standards, the application of standard dilution method and the dilution of the extracts before instrumental determination. The results obtained indicated that evaluation of matrix effects should become an integrated part of quantitative LC–ESI-MS method development and validation.