Breast cancer survival and prognosis by screening history

Background: Cancers not detected by breast screening are commonly assumed to have poorer prognosis. Methods: We examined the survival experience of all women aged 50–74 years diagnosed with a first breast cancer between 1998 and 2006 in British Columbia, Canada and determined their screening experie...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:British journal of cancer Vol. 110; no. 3; pp. 556 - 559
Main Authors: Coldman, A J, Phillips, N
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: London Nature Publishing Group UK 04-02-2014
Nature Publishing Group
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background: Cancers not detected by breast screening are commonly assumed to have poorer prognosis. Methods: We examined the survival experience of all women aged 50–74 years diagnosed with a first breast cancer between 1998 and 2006 in British Columbia, Canada and determined their screening experience. Disease-specific survival rates were calculated and, for cases diagnosed in 2002, prognostic factors (size, nodal involvement, grade ER status and stage) were examined by time since screening. Results: Breast cancers diagnosed at screening had the best survival ( P <0.001). Cancers detected within 12 months of a negative screen had similar survival rates ( P =0.98) to those diagnosed within 12–23 and 24–47 months, with other non-screen-detected cancers having poorer survival ( P <0.001). The prognostic profile of cancers diagnosed in 2002 followed a similar pattern. Interpretation: There was no evidence that cancers diagnosed within 12 months had poorer prognosis than those diagnosed up to 48 months following screening.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0007-0920
1532-1827
DOI:10.1038/bjc.2013.732