Breast cancer survival and prognosis by screening history
Background: Cancers not detected by breast screening are commonly assumed to have poorer prognosis. Methods: We examined the survival experience of all women aged 50–74 years diagnosed with a first breast cancer between 1998 and 2006 in British Columbia, Canada and determined their screening experie...
Saved in:
Published in: | British journal of cancer Vol. 110; no. 3; pp. 556 - 559 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
London
Nature Publishing Group UK
04-02-2014
Nature Publishing Group |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Background:
Cancers not detected by breast screening are commonly assumed to have poorer prognosis.
Methods:
We examined the survival experience of all women aged 50–74 years diagnosed with a first breast cancer between 1998 and 2006 in British Columbia, Canada and determined their screening experience. Disease-specific survival rates were calculated and, for cases diagnosed in 2002, prognostic factors (size, nodal involvement, grade ER status and stage) were examined by time since screening.
Results:
Breast cancers diagnosed at screening had the best survival (
P
<0.001). Cancers detected within 12 months of a negative screen had similar survival rates (
P
=0.98) to those diagnosed within 12–23 and 24–47 months, with other non-screen-detected cancers having poorer survival (
P
<0.001). The prognostic profile of cancers diagnosed in 2002 followed a similar pattern.
Interpretation:
There was no evidence that cancers diagnosed within 12 months had poorer prognosis than those diagnosed up to 48 months following screening. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0007-0920 1532-1827 |
DOI: | 10.1038/bjc.2013.732 |