Design and analytical validation of a duplex PCR for Ehrlichia and Rickettsia detection in ticks

Background: EhrlichiaandRickettsiaare two major rickettsial genera transmitted by ticks that affect anumber of wild and domestic animal species and human populations around the world. Objective: To design and validate a duplex PCR for Ehrlichia and Rickettsia in ticks. Methods: Assay validation incl...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Pecuarias Vol. 31; no. 4; pp. 285 - 294
Main Authors: Pérez Pérez, Juan C, Carolina Montoya Ruiz, Esteban Arroyave Sierra, Paternina, Luis E, Rodas, Juan D
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Medellín Universidad de Antioquía 01-10-2018
Universidad de Antioquia
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background: EhrlichiaandRickettsiaare two major rickettsial genera transmitted by ticks that affect anumber of wild and domestic animal species and human populations around the world. Objective: To design and validate a duplex PCR for Ehrlichia and Rickettsia in ticks. Methods: Assay validation included testing for sensitivity, specificity, reproducibility, and robustness of the PCR. The groEL and 23sr RNA genes were used for Ehrlichia and Rickettsia, respectively. Results: The limit of detection was one hundred gene copies per 50 μL of reaction for Ehrlichia spp, and one gene copy of Rickettsia per 50 μL of reaction. In general, the primers of the test only amplified in silico those bacterial agents for which they were originally designed, with the exception of the primers for Rickettsia that also amplified Methylocystis sp. The test was reproducible (intermediate precision) 96.7% of the times for both agents. The test was robust enough to tolerate concentration changes of all reagents with the exception of Taq DNA polymerase. Conclusions: The validation results indicated that this PCR is useful for detection in both bacterial genera and it is a good candidate for diagnostic validation.
ISSN:0120-0690
2256-2958
DOI:10.17533/udea.rccp.v31n4a05