Simplified vacuum dressing system: effectiveness and safety in wounds management

Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) has revolutionized wound care, but its high cost reduces the procedure's availability. To solve the problem, streamlined vacuum dressings systems have been proposed, but the utility of these devices has been poorly studied. The objective of this study was...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira Vol. 37; no. 9; p. e370906
Main Authors: Souza, Sandro Cilindro de, Mendes, Carlos Maurício Cardeal, Meneses, José Valber Lima, Dias, Rosana Menezes
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Brazil Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia 01-01-2022
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) has revolutionized wound care, but its high cost reduces the procedure's availability. To solve the problem, streamlined vacuum dressings systems have been proposed, but the utility of these devices has been poorly studied. The objective of this study was to evaluate a simplified vacuum dressing system model (SVDM). Randomized clinical trial in which wounds were treated with SVDM compared to a complex occlusive dressing (silver hydrofiber, SHF). The analyzed outcomes were cleaning, presence of granulation tissue, clinical appearance, and indication for surgical closure of wounds. Fifty injuries were treated (25 in each group), most located on lower limbs. SVDM proved to be more effective than SHF in the evaluated outcomes. Wound recalcitrance reduced the effectiveness of the equipment used. Despite its efficacy, complications occurred, the most frequent related to dressing changes: minor bleeding, foam adherence to a wound bed, and pain. Only for bleeding no favorable risk-benefit ratio was found. There were no severe complications, worsening conditions of injuries, or deaths. SVDM proved to be an effective and acceptably safe device for managing studied wounds.
Bibliography:Conflict of Interest: Nothing to declare.
ISSN:0102-8650
1678-2674
DOI:10.1590/acb370906