Supercooled liquid fogs over the central Greenland Ice Sheet
Radiation fogs at Summit Station, Greenland (72.58∘ N, 38.48∘ W; 3210 m a.s.l.), are frequently reported by observers. The fogs are often accompanied by fogbows, indicating the particles are composed of liquid; and because of the low temperatures at Summit, this liquid is supercooled. Here we analyz...
Saved in:
Published in: | Atmospheric chemistry and physics Vol. 19; no. 11; pp. 7467 - 7485 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Katlenburg-Lindau
Copernicus GmbH
05-06-2019
Copernicus Publications |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Abstract | Radiation fogs at Summit Station, Greenland (72.58∘ N,
38.48∘ W; 3210 m a.s.l.), are frequently reported by observers. The
fogs are often accompanied by fogbows, indicating the particles are composed
of liquid; and because of the low temperatures at Summit, this liquid is
supercooled. Here we analyze the formation of these fogs as well as their
physical and radiative properties. In situ observations of particle size and
droplet number concentration were made using scattering spectrometers near 2 and 10 m height from 2012 to 2014. These data are complemented by
colocated observations of meteorology, turbulent and radiative fluxes, and
remote sensing. We find that liquid fogs occur in all seasons with the
highest frequency in September and a minimum in April. Due to the
characteristics of the boundary-layer meteorology, the fogs are elevated,
forming between 2 and 10 m, and the particles then fall toward the surface.
The diameter of mature particles is typically 20–25 µm in summer.
Number concentrations are higher at warmer temperatures and, thus, higher in
summer compared to winter. The fogs form at temperatures as warm as −5 ∘C, while the coldest form at temperatures approaching −40 ∘C. Facilitated by the elevated condensation, in winter two-thirds of
fogs occurred within a relatively warm layer above the surface when the
near-surface air was below −40 ∘C, as cold as −57 ∘C,
which is too cold to support liquid water. This implies that fog particles
settling through this layer of cold air freeze in the air column before
contacting the surface, thereby accumulating at the surface as ice without
riming. Liquid fogs observed under otherwise clear skies annually imparted
1.5 W m−2 of cloud radiative forcing (CRF). While this is a small
contribution to the surface radiation climatology, individual events are
influential. The mean CRF during liquid fog events was 26 W m−2, and
was sometimes much higher. An extreme case study was observed to
radiatively force 5 ∘C of surface warming during the coldest part
of the day, effectively damping the diurnal cycle. At lower elevations of
the ice sheet where melting is more common, such damping could signal a role
for fogs in preconditioning the surface for melting later in the day. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Radiation fogs at Summit Station, Greenland (72.58.sup.â N, 38.48.sup.â W; 3210 m a.s.l.), are frequently reported by observers. The fogs are often accompanied by fogbows, indicating the particles are composed of liquid; and because of the low temperatures at Summit, this liquid is supercooled. Here we analyze the formation of these fogs as well as their physical and radiative properties. In situ observations of particle size and droplet number concentration were made using scattering spectrometers near 2 and 10 m height from 2012 to 2014. These data are complemented by colocated observations of meteorology, turbulent and radiative fluxes, and remote sensing. We find that liquid fogs occur in all seasons with the highest frequency in September and a minimum in April. Due to the characteristics of the boundary-layer meteorology, the fogs are elevated, forming between 2 and 10 m, and the particles then fall toward the surface. The diameter of mature particles is typically 20-25 µm in summer. Number concentrations are higher at warmer temperatures and, thus, higher in summer compared to winter. The fogs form at temperatures as warm as -5 .sup.â C, while the coldest form at temperatures approaching -40 .sup.â C. Facilitated by the elevated condensation, in winter two-thirds of fogs occurred within a relatively warm layer above the surface when the near-surface air was below -40 .sup.â C, as cold as -57 .sup.â C, which is too cold to support liquid water. This implies that fog particles settling through this layer of cold air freeze in the air column before contacting the surface, thereby accumulating at the surface as ice without riming. Liquid fogs observed under otherwise clear skies annually imparted 1.5 W m.sup.-2 of cloud radiative forcing (CRF). While this is a small contribution to the surface radiation climatology, individual events are influential. The mean CRF during liquid fog events was 26 W m.sup.-2, and was sometimes much higher. An extreme case study was observed to radiatively force 5 .sup.â C of surface warming during the coldest part of the day, effectively damping the diurnal cycle. At lower elevations of the ice sheet where melting is more common, such damping could signal a role for fogs in preconditioning the surface for melting later in the day. Radiation fogs at Summit Station, Greenland (72.58∘ N, 38.48∘ W; 3210 m a.s.l.), are frequently reported by observers. The fogs are often accompanied by fogbows, indicating the particles are composed of liquid; and because of the low temperatures at Summit, this liquid is supercooled. Here we analyze the formation of these fogs as well as their physical and radiative properties. In situ observations of particle size and droplet number concentration were made using scattering spectrometers near 2 and 10 m height from 2012 to 2014. These data are complemented by colocated observations of meteorology, turbulent and radiative fluxes, and remote sensing. We find that liquid fogs occur in all seasons with the highest frequency in September and a minimum in April. Due to the characteristics of the boundary-layer meteorology, the fogs are elevated, forming between 2 and 10 m, and the particles then fall toward the surface. The diameter of mature particles is typically 20–25 µm in summer. Number concentrations are higher at warmer temperatures and, thus, higher in summer compared to winter. The fogs form at temperatures as warm as −5 ∘C, while the coldest form at temperatures approaching −40 ∘C. Facilitated by the elevated condensation, in winter two-thirds of fogs occurred within a relatively warm layer above the surface when the near-surface air was below −40 ∘C, as cold as −57 ∘C, which is too cold to support liquid water. This implies that fog particles settling through this layer of cold air freeze in the air column before contacting the surface, thereby accumulating at the surface as ice without riming. Liquid fogs observed under otherwise clear skies annually imparted 1.5 W m−2 of cloud radiative forcing (CRF). While this is a small contribution to the surface radiation climatology, individual events are influential. The mean CRF during liquid fog events was 26 W m−2, and was sometimes much higher. An extreme case study was observed to radiatively force 5 ∘C of surface warming during the coldest part of the day, effectively damping the diurnal cycle. At lower elevations of the ice sheet where melting is more common, such damping could signal a role for fogs in preconditioning the surface for melting later in the day. Radiation fogs at Summit Station, Greenland (72.58∘ N, 38.48∘ W; 3210 m a.s.l.), are frequently reported by observers. The fogs are often accompanied by fogbows, indicating the particles are composed of liquid; and because of the low temperatures at Summit, this liquid is supercooled. Here we analyze the formation of these fogs as well as their physical and radiative properties. In situ observations of particle size and droplet number concentration were made using scattering spectrometers near 2 and 10 m height from 2012 to 2014. These data are complemented by colocated observations of meteorology, turbulent and radiative fluxes, and remote sensing. We find that liquid fogs occur in all seasons with the highest frequency in September and a minimum in April. Due to the characteristics of the boundary-layer meteorology, the fogs are elevated, forming between 2 and 10 m, and the particles then fall toward the surface. The diameter of mature particles is typically 20–25 µm in summer. Number concentrations are higher at warmer temperatures and, thus, higher in summer compared to winter. The fogs form at temperatures as warm as -5 ∘C, while the coldest form at temperatures approaching -40 ∘C. Facilitated by the elevated condensation, in winter two-thirds of fogs occurred within a relatively warm layer above the surface when the near-surface air was below -40 ∘C, as cold as -57 ∘C, which is too cold to support liquid water. This implies that fog particles settling through this layer of cold air freeze in the air column before contacting the surface, thereby accumulating at the surface as ice without riming. Liquid fogs observed under otherwise clear skies annually imparted 1.5 W m-2 of cloud radiative forcing (CRF). While this is a small contribution to the surface radiation climatology, individual events are influential. The mean CRF during liquid fog events was 26 W m-2, and was sometimes much higher. An extreme case study was observed to radiatively force 5 ∘C of surface warming during the coldest part of the day, effectively damping the diurnal cycle. At lower elevations of the ice sheet where melting is more common, such damping could signal a role for fogs in preconditioning the surface for melting later in the day. Radiation fogs at Summit Station, Greenland (72.58 ∘ N, 38.48 ∘ W; 3210 m a.s.l.), are frequently reported by observers. The fogs are often accompanied by fogbows, indicating the particles are composed of liquid; and because of the low temperatures at Summit, this liquid is supercooled. Here we analyze the formation of these fogs as well as their physical and radiative properties. In situ observations of particle size and droplet number concentration were made using scattering spectrometers near 2 and 10 m height from 2012 to 2014. These data are complemented by colocated observations of meteorology, turbulent and radiative fluxes, and remote sensing. We find that liquid fogs occur in all seasons with the highest frequency in September and a minimum in April. Due to the characteristics of the boundary-layer meteorology, the fogs are elevated, forming between 2 and 10 m, and the particles then fall toward the surface. The diameter of mature particles is typically 20–25 µ m in summer. Number concentrations are higher at warmer temperatures and, thus, higher in summer compared to winter. The fogs form at temperatures as warm as −5 ∘ C, while the coldest form at temperatures approaching −40 ∘ C. Facilitated by the elevated condensation, in winter two-thirds of fogs occurred within a relatively warm layer above the surface when the near-surface air was below −40 ∘ C, as cold as −57 ∘ C, which is too cold to support liquid water. This implies that fog particles settling through this layer of cold air freeze in the air column before contacting the surface, thereby accumulating at the surface as ice without riming. Liquid fogs observed under otherwise clear skies annually imparted 1.5 W m −2 of cloud radiative forcing (CRF). While this is a small contribution to the surface radiation climatology, individual events are influential. The mean CRF during liquid fog events was 26 W m −2 , and was sometimes much higher. An extreme case study was observed to radiatively force 5 ∘ C of surface warming during the coldest part of the day, effectively damping the diurnal cycle. At lower elevations of the ice sheet where melting is more common, such damping could signal a role for fogs in preconditioning the surface for melting later in the day. |
Audience | Academic |
Author | Noone, David C Cox, Christopher J Walden, Von P Shupe, Matthew D Berkelhammer, Max Neff, William D Miller, Nathaniel B Steffen, Konrad |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 fullname: Cox, Christopher J – sequence: 2 fullname: Noone, David C – sequence: 3 fullname: Berkelhammer, Max – sequence: 4 fullname: Shupe, Matthew D – sequence: 5 fullname: Neff, William D – sequence: 6 fullname: Miller, Nathaniel B – sequence: 7 fullname: Walden, Von P – sequence: 8 fullname: Steffen, Konrad |
BookMark | eNptkc9LHDEUx0OxULXeexzoycNofk4S8CKidkEodNtzyCQva5bZyZrMiP73zXbFdqHkkPD4vC8v73OCjsY0AkJfCL4QRPNL67Yt0a3knWwpJvoDOiadwq1klB_98_6ETkpZY0wFJvwYXS3nLWSX0gC-GeLTHH0T0qo06RlyMz1C42Ccsh2a-wwwDnb0zcJBs3wEmD6jj8EOBc7e7lP06-7258239uH7_eLm-qF1XOGpJZiBEoJzK0QvCdNMSk9d6JVWlniMOVOEckpCsJpx2QeHNeUeM9dZ0kl2ihb7XJ_s2mxz3Nj8apKN5k8h5ZWxeYpuAMOcBUyZFMpjLgLute6dCLpTkmqiupr1dZ-1zelphjKZdZrzWMc3lDKuqWSE_6VWtobGMaS6A7eJxZlroaRidX2sUhf_oerxsImu-gmx1g8azg8aKjPBy7SycylmsfxxyOI963IqJUN4_zjBZqfcVOWGaLNTbnbK2W_L5ZsL |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1038_s41558_020_00969_5 crossref_primary_10_5194_acp_21_15351_2021 crossref_primary_10_3390_rs14122795 crossref_primary_10_5194_amt_15_5095_2022 crossref_primary_10_1029_2023JD038718 |
Cites_doi | 10.1175/JTECH-1663.1 10.1007/978-0-306-48100-0 10.1029/95JD01267 10.1007/s00024-007-0211-x 10.1016/j.atmosres.2014.04.014 10.1175/2010JAMC2467.1 10.1007/s10546-004-5641-8 10.1029/2004JD004862 10.1016/j.jqsrt.2004.05.058 10.1364/AO.30.003415 10.1029/97JD01522 10.1023/A:1002490423389 10.1029/2012GL053611 10.5194/angeo-20-1891-2002 10.5194/acp-18-11599-2018 10.1109/TGRS.2007.903703 10.1002/2014JD021975 10.1080/01431168408948799 10.1002/2015JD023072 10.1256/qj.03.120 10.1175/JTECH-1662.1 10.1016/S0021-8502(99)00563-7 10.1175/JAM2208.1 10.5194/amt-5-2237-2012 10.5194/tc-11-2755-2017 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.01.033 10.1175/JTECH1906.1 10.1002/qj.49711247218 10.1175/JAMC-D-17-0230.1 10.1175/JCLI-D-15-0076.1 10.1175/BAMS-D-11-00249.1 10.1038/ncomms10117 10.1175/JAM2542.1 10.1126/sciadv.1501704 10.5194/tc-11-497-2017 10.1038/nature04636 10.1038/nature12002 10.5194/acp-18-4715-2018 10.1016/0021-8502(79)90136-8 10.1029/2012JD018867 10.18739/A2Z37J |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | COPYRIGHT 2019 Copernicus GmbH 2019. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. |
Copyright_xml | – notice: COPYRIGHT 2019 Copernicus GmbH – notice: 2019. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION ISR 7QH 7TG 7TN 7UA 8FD 8FE 8FG ABUWG AFKRA ARAPS ATCPS AZQEC BENPR BFMQW BGLVJ BHPHI BKSAR C1K CCPQU DWQXO F1W GNUQQ H8D H96 HCIFZ KL. L.G L7M P5Z P62 PATMY PCBAR PIMPY PQEST PQQKQ PQUKI PYCSY DOA |
DOI | 10.5194/acp-19-7467-2019 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef Gale in Context: Science Aqualine Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts Oceanic Abstracts Water Resources Abstracts Technology Research Database ProQuest SciTech Collection ProQuest Technology Collection ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest Central UK/Ireland Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database (1962 - current) ProQuest Agriculture & Environmental Science Database ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Central Continental Europe Database Technology Collection ProQuest Natural Science Collection Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management ProQuest One Community College ProQuest Central ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts ProQuest Central Student Aerospace Database Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3) Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection Environmental Science Database ProQuest Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3) ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition Environmental Science Collection Directory of Open Access Journals |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef Publicly Available Content Database Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional ProQuest Central Student Technology Collection Technology Research Database ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) SciTech Premium Collection ProQuest One Community College Water Resources Abstracts Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection ProQuest Central Aerospace Database Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts Oceanic Abstracts Natural Science Collection ProQuest Central Korea Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database ProQuest Technology Collection Continental Europe Database ProQuest SciTech Collection Aqualine Environmental Science Collection Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts Environmental Science Database ProQuest One Academic Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | CrossRef Publicly Available Content Database |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: DOA name: Directory of Open Access Journals url: http://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Meteorology & Climatology |
EISSN | 1680-7324 |
EndPage | 7485 |
ExternalDocumentID | oai_doaj_org_article_3cae023758d045f0b99bc5f968729186 A587832503 10_5194_acp_19_7467_2019 |
GeographicLocations | Greenland |
GeographicLocations_xml | – name: Greenland |
GroupedDBID | 23N 2WC 3V. 4P2 5GY 5VS 6J9 7XC 8FE 8FG 8FH 8R4 8R5 AAFWJ AAYXX ABUWG ACGFO ADBBV AENEX AFKRA AFRAH AHGZY AIAGR ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ARAPS ATCPS BBORY BCNDV BENPR BFMQW BGLVJ BHPHI BKSAR BPHCQ CCPQU CITATION D1K E3Z EBS EDH EJD FD6 GROUPED_DOAJ GX1 H13 HCIFZ HH5 IAO IEA ISR ITC K6- KQ8 M~E OK1 P2P P62 PATMY PCBAR PIMPY PQQKQ PROAC PYCSY Q2X RIG RKB RNS TR2 XSB ~02 AFPKN 7QH 7TG 7TN 7UA 8FD AZQEC C1K DWQXO F1W GNUQQ H8D H96 KL. L.G L7M PQEST PQUKI |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-103e85544a55b7139377d2cfb898a1d0043812421ffa9347bfc0924d03c6a1673 |
IEDL.DBID | DOA |
ISSN | 1680-7324 1680-7316 |
IngestDate | Tue Oct 22 14:41:07 EDT 2024 Sat Nov 09 09:52:26 EST 2024 Tue Nov 19 21:12:31 EST 2024 Tue Nov 12 23:17:55 EST 2024 Thu Aug 01 20:03:14 EDT 2024 Thu Nov 21 21:02:10 EST 2024 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 11 |
Language | English |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c480t-103e85544a55b7139377d2cfb898a1d0043812421ffa9347bfc0924d03c6a1673 |
ORCID | 0000-0002-8924-716X 0000-0003-2203-7173 0000-0002-0973-9982 |
OpenAccessLink | https://doaj.org/article/3cae023758d045f0b99bc5f968729186 |
PQID | 2234927314 |
PQPubID | 105744 |
PageCount | 19 |
ParticipantIDs | doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_3cae023758d045f0b99bc5f968729186 proquest_journals_2234927314 gale_infotracmisc_A587832503 gale_infotracacademiconefile_A587832503 gale_incontextgauss_ISR_A587832503 crossref_primary_10_5194_acp_19_7467_2019 |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2019-06-05 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2019-06-05 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 06 year: 2019 text: 2019-06-05 day: 05 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationPlace | Katlenburg-Lindau |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Katlenburg-Lindau |
PublicationTitle | Atmospheric chemistry and physics |
PublicationYear | 2019 |
Publisher | Copernicus GmbH Copernicus Publications |
Publisher_xml | – name: Copernicus GmbH – name: Copernicus Publications |
References | ref13 ref57 ref12 ref56 ref15 ref59 ref14 ref58 ref53 ref52 ref11 ref55 ref10 ref54 ref17 ref16 ref19 ref18 ref51 ref50 ref46 ref45 ref48 ref47 ref42 ref41 ref44 ref43 ref49 ref8 ref7 ref9 ref4 ref3 ref6 ref5 ref40 ref35 ref34 ref37 ref36 ref31 ref30 ref33 ref32 ref2 ref1 ref39 ref38 ref71 ref70 ref72 ref24 ref68 ref23 ref67 ref26 ref25 ref69 ref20 ref64 ref63 ref22 ref66 ref21 ref65 ref28 ref27 ref29 ref60 ref62 ref61 |
References_xml | – ident: ref37 – ident: ref62 – ident: ref24 doi: 10.1175/JTECH-1663.1 – ident: ref40 doi: 10.1007/978-0-306-48100-0 – ident: ref3 doi: 10.1029/95JD01267 – ident: ref66 – ident: ref43 – ident: ref19 doi: 10.1007/s00024-007-0211-x – ident: ref20 doi: 10.1016/j.atmosres.2014.04.014 – ident: ref52 doi: 10.1175/2010JAMC2467.1 – ident: ref72 – ident: ref69 – ident: ref57 – ident: ref34 – ident: ref30 – ident: ref13 – ident: ref58 doi: 10.1007/s10546-004-5641-8 – ident: ref36 – ident: ref61 – ident: ref65 – ident: ref6 – ident: ref44 – ident: ref1 doi: 10.1029/2004JD004862 – ident: ref9 doi: 10.1016/j.jqsrt.2004.05.058 – ident: ref26 doi: 10.1364/AO.30.003415 – ident: ref25 doi: 10.1029/97JD01522 – ident: ref31 doi: 10.1023/A:1002490423389 – ident: ref33 doi: 10.1029/2012GL053611 – ident: ref18 doi: 10.5194/angeo-20-1891-2002 – ident: ref50 – ident: ref47 – ident: ref41 doi: 10.5194/acp-18-11599-2018 – ident: ref64 doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2007.903703 – ident: ref10 doi: 10.1002/2014JD021975 – ident: ref71 – ident: ref12 doi: 10.1080/01431168408948799 – ident: ref8 doi: 10.1002/2015JD023072 – ident: ref17 doi: 10.1256/qj.03.120 – ident: ref23 doi: 10.1175/JTECH-1662.1 – ident: ref5 doi: 10.1016/S0021-8502(99)00563-7 – ident: ref7 – ident: ref68 – ident: ref45 – ident: ref59 doi: 10.1175/JAM2208.1 – ident: ref54 doi: 10.5194/amt-5-2237-2012 – ident: ref60 – ident: ref16 doi: 10.5194/tc-11-2755-2017 – ident: ref32 doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.01.033 – ident: ref63 doi: 10.1175/JTECH1906.1 – ident: ref22 doi: 10.1002/qj.49711247218 – ident: ref48 – ident: ref14 doi: 10.1175/JAMC-D-17-0230.1 – ident: ref28 doi: 10.1175/JCLI-D-15-0076.1 – ident: ref70 – ident: ref55 – ident: ref53 doi: 10.1175/BAMS-D-11-00249.1 – ident: ref11 doi: 10.1038/ncomms10117 – ident: ref21 doi: 10.1175/JAM2542.1 – ident: ref4 doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1501704 – ident: ref67 – ident: ref46 – ident: ref29 doi: 10.5194/tc-11-497-2017 – ident: ref42 – ident: ref15 doi: 10.1038/nature04636 – ident: ref2 doi: 10.1038/nature12002 – ident: ref49 – ident: ref38 doi: 10.5194/acp-18-4715-2018 – ident: ref39 doi: 10.1016/0021-8502(79)90136-8 – ident: ref27 doi: 10.1029/2012JD018867 – ident: ref51 doi: 10.18739/A2Z37J – ident: ref56 – ident: ref35 |
SSID | ssj0025014 |
Score | 2.379525 |
Snippet | Radiation fogs at Summit Station, Greenland (72.58∘ N,
38.48∘ W; 3210 m a.s.l.), are frequently reported by observers. The
fogs are often accompanied by... Radiation fogs at Summit Station, Greenland (72.58.sup.â N, 38.48.sup.â W; 3210 m a.s.l.), are frequently reported by observers. The fogs are often... Radiation fogs at Summit Station, Greenland (72.58∘ N, 38.48∘ W; 3210 m a.s.l.), are frequently reported by observers. The fogs are often accompanied by... Radiation fogs at Summit Station, Greenland (72.58 ∘ N, 38.48 ∘ W; 3210 m a.s.l.), are frequently reported by observers. The fogs are often accompanied by... |
SourceID | doaj proquest gale crossref |
SourceType | Open Website Aggregation Database |
StartPage | 7467 |
SubjectTerms | Aerodynamics Air Climatology Cloudbows Cold Condensation Damping Diurnal cycle Diurnal variations Environmental aspects Fluxes Fog Glaciation Greenland ice sheet Ice Ice sheets Low temperature Melting Meteorology Observations Preconditioning Radiation Radiation (Physics) Radiative forcing Remote sensing Spectrometers Summer Supercooled liquids Surface temperature Water Weather Winter |
Title | Supercooled liquid fogs over the central Greenland Ice Sheet |
URI | https://www.proquest.com/docview/2234927314 https://doaj.org/article/3cae023758d045f0b99bc5f968729186 |
Volume | 19 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://sdu.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Nb9QwELWgJy4ICohAW1kIgThEddZ2bEu9tKVVe4ADCxI3y59lpdVm2Wz-PzNOtmIPFRekXJL4kLzxx5vMyzMh75nKJksu68yYqwX3udZAa-vgcxAqOC6L2v1mrr7-1J-v0Cbnfqsv1ISN9sAjcKc8uATrCtDaCOwjM2-MDzKbVgMtbPRots3ULpmaUi2slmGq1WpW495MY4ES2Io4dWFdN6bGbTagi6DDzl8LUvHtf2h2LkvO9TPydOKK9Hx8xufkUVodkuoL0NxuU76G0w_0crkAzlnOXpCz-bBOm9B1yxTpcvF7WESau7ueok6TAtWjkxaTFrkNihrpbUh0_iul7Uvy4_rq--VNPW2PUAeh2RYmUJ5QZCaclB5yTSAaKs5C9tpo18TRvQsrvjk7w4UC9BlkW5Hx0LqmVfwVOVh1q_SaUOW1b-VMqKizKKVCOCKXpvGaZT2ryKcdRnY9umBYyB4QTwt42sZYxNMinhW5QBDv26F_dbkAUbVTVO2_olqRdxgCiw4VK5TA3Lmh7-3t_Js9l1rBNCQZr8jHqVHuALvgpj8K4J3Q1Gqv5dFeSxhCYf_2LtJ2GsK9Bd4kDJC7Rrz5H2_0ljxBdIrKTB6Rg-1mSMfkcR-Hk9J1_wCmcerm |
link.rule.ids | 315,782,786,866,2107,27934,27935 |
linkProvider | Directory of Open Access Journals |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Supercooled+liquid+fogs+over+the+central+Greenland+Ice+Sheet&rft.jtitle=Atmospheric+chemistry+and+physics&rft.au=Cox%2C+Christopher+J&rft.au=Noone%2C+David+C&rft.au=Berkelhammer%2C+Max&rft.au=Shupe%2C+Matthew+D&rft.date=2019-06-05&rft.pub=Copernicus+GmbH&rft.issn=1680-7316&rft.eissn=1680-7324&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=7467&rft.epage=7485&rft_id=info:doi/10.5194%2Facp-19-7467-2019&rft.externalDBID=HAS_PDF_LINK |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1680-7324&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1680-7324&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1680-7324&client=summon |