The E‐cadherin gene is silenced by CpG methylation in human oral squamous cell carcinomas
Reduction of E‐cadherin strongly relates to invasiveness and metastasis in vitro. To clarify CpG methylation around the promoter region of the E‐cadherin gene in oral squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), we examined the DNA samples of various human SCC cell lines and primary oral SCC tissues by methylatio...
Saved in:
Published in: | International journal of cancer Vol. 93; no. 5; pp. 667 - 673 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
New York
John Wiley & Sons, Inc
01-09-2001
Wiley-Liss |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Reduction of E‐cadherin strongly relates to invasiveness and metastasis in vitro. To clarify CpG methylation around the promoter region of the E‐cadherin gene in oral squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), we examined the DNA samples of various human SCC cell lines and primary oral SCC tissues by methylation‐specific polymerase chain reaction (MSP). CpG methylation of the E‐cadherin gene markedly correlated to the reduction of E‐cadherin expression in human oral SCC cell lines. In primary oral SCC tissues, only 1 of 5 preserved E‐cadherin‐expressing tissues was methylated, whereas methylation was found in 17 (94.4%) of 18 E‐cadherin‐reduced tissues. Our results suggest that reduction of E‐cadherin expression is associated with CpG methylation of the E‐cadherin gene promoter. We recently established two cell lines with high and low metastatic potential, UM1 and UM2, from SCC primary tongue tissue of a patient. E‐cadherin expression of high‐metastatic UM1 was clearly lower than that of low‐metastatic UM2, and MSP results showed CpG methylation in the UM1 but not the UM2 cell line. To investigate whether demethylation of CpG methylation of the E‐cadherin gene could restore expression and function of E‐cadherin, we treated UM1 with the demethylating agent 5‐azacytidine (5‐aza) and found that E‐cadherin expression was indeed restored by demethylation. Moreover, in the demethylated UM1, invasion of the collagen gel was clearly suppressed compared with the untreated UM1. These results suggested that inactivation of E‐cadherin expression resulted from CpG methylation of the gene promoter; a correlation between CpG methylation of the E‐cadherin gene promoter and invasive potential was also suggested. © 2001 Wiley‐Liss, Inc. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | Fax: +81‐86235‐6704 ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0020-7136 1097-0215 |
DOI: | 10.1002/ijc.1386 |