Impact of monitoring surface temperature during pulmonary vein isolation in a second-generation hot balloon system

• Published in: International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature Vol. 39; p. 100967
• Main Authors: Fukunaga, Hiroshi, Sekiguchi, Yukio, Asano, Sou, Nagase, Takahiko, Tanizaki, Kohei, Umemura, Jun, Nitta, Junichi, Isobe, Mitsuaki
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Ireland Elsevier B.V 01-04-2022; Elsevier
• Subjects: Atrial fibrillation; Computer-aided engineering; Hot balloon; Original Paper; Pulmonary vein isolation; Surface temperature monitoring; Surface temperature monitoring; Computer-aided engineering; Hot balloon; Atrial fibrillation; Pulmonary vein isolation
• ISSN: 2352-9067; 2352-9067
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2022.100967

A surface temperature sensor can be used to visualize the effect of hot balloon (HB) catheters. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of a second-generation HB system with surface temperature monitoring in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF).
Twenty patients (age: 69.6 ± 9.7 years, 11 male participants) who underwent first-time pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) using a second-generation HB were included. For each pulmonary vein (PV), the acute isolation rate and effective therapeutic range of surface temperature were investigated.
Eighty-three PVs (including three right middle PVs) were isolated in 20 patients using an HB with a surface temperature sensor. Sixty-eight PVs were isolated using the first application. Fifteen PVs (left superior PV [LSPV], n = 7 [35%]; left inferior PV, n = 2 [10%]; right superior PV, n = 3 [15%]; right inferior PV, n = 3 [15%]) showed early intraoperative reconduction and required second applications. One LSPV required radiofrequency touch-up at the carina. The optimal balloon surface temperature and application time were evaluated, and a median value of 58 °C and integral value of 1000 °C·s were identified from the receiver operating characteristic curve to be useful effective indicators. However, for LSPV, the PV potential of carina or ridge likely often remained and needed to be independently considered. There was no periprocedural complication including severe pulmonary vein stenosis. During the observation period (median: 280 days, interquartile range: 261–318 days), 17 patients (85%) achieved and maintained sinus rhythm.
Second-generation HBs with a surface temperature sensor are expected to provide favorable outcomes in AF ablation treatment.