Predictive processing models and affective neuroscience

•The neural basis of affective experience remains elusive.•Common experimental paradigms are critiqued from a predictive processing view.•Predictive processing may address issues of low reliability and selectivity in fMRI.•Predictive processing reformulates “reverse inference” in cognitive neuroscie...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews Vol. 131; pp. 211 - 228
Main Authors: Lee, Kent M., Ferreira-Santos, Fernando, Satpute, Ajay B.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: United States Elsevier Ltd 01-12-2021
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:•The neural basis of affective experience remains elusive.•Common experimental paradigms are critiqued from a predictive processing view.•Predictive processing may address issues of low reliability and selectivity in fMRI.•Predictive processing reformulates “reverse inference” in cognitive neuroscience.•Predictive processing models favor external/ecological validity in task design. The neural bases of affective experience remain elusive. Early neuroscience models of affect searched for specific brain regions that uniquely carried out the computations that underlie dimensions of valence and arousal. However, a growing body of work has failed to identify these circuits. Research turned to multivariate analyses, but these strategies, too, have made limited progress. Predictive processing models offer exciting new directions to address this problem. Here, we use predictive processing models as a lens to critique prevailing functional neuroimaging research practices in affective neuroscience. Our review highlights how much work relies on rigid assumptions that are inconsistent with a predictive processing approach. We outline the central aspects of a predictive processing model and draw out their implications for research in affective and cognitive neuroscience. Predictive models motivate a reformulation of “reverse inference” in cognitive neuroscience, and placing a greater emphasis on external validity in experimental design.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0149-7634
1873-7528
1873-7528
DOI:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.09.009