Perspective distortion tolerances and skull-face registration in craniofacial superimposition: an analytical review

• Published in: International journal of legal medicine Vol. 137; no. 6; pp. 1767 - 1776
• Main Authors: Healy, Sean S., Stephan, Carl N.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Berlin/Heidelberg Springer Berlin Heidelberg 01-11-2023; Springer Nature B.V
• Subjects: Face - anatomy & histology; Face - diagnostic imaging; Forensic Anthropology - methods; Forensic Medicine; Humans; Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods; Image registration; Imaging, Three-Dimensional; Male; Medical Law; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Misalignment; Photography; Registration; Review; Skull; Skull - anatomy & histology; Skull - diagnostic imaging; Synthetic data; Tolerances; Tomography, X-Ray Computed; Photographic superimposition; Forensic anthropology; Alignment; Face; Video superimposition; Error tolerance
• ISSN: 0937-9827; 1437-1596; 1437-1596
• DOI: 10.1007/s00414-023-03081-3

Craniofacial superimposition requires the photographic registration of a skull at transparency to a photograph of an antemortem (AM) face so that anatomical concordance between the two can be assessed. When the camera vantage point of the AM photograph is exactly replicated for skull photography, the superimposition is a relatively straightforward process as the images are precisely comparable without complicating factors. In practice, however, focus distances are almost never exactly replicated because the focus distance for AM face photography is rarely known. Embedded differences in perspective, thereby, drive the images away from correspondence, raising questions as to how much difference can be tolerated and what image registration methods should be used. Recently, a ± 1% mismatch in facial height has been posited as an acceptable upper tolerance limit to differential perspective, but this proposition is speculative and has not yet been confirmed by tests on real-life images. In addition, the impact of image registration methods, though critically relevant, has received comparatively little consideration. This paper provides the first in-depth review of these intertwined perspective/registration matters and objective evaluation of tolerances by using real 2D photographic images and synthetic images generated from 3D CT data to demonstrate perspective impact on skull morphology. Taken together, the review confirms a ≤ 1% perspective difference in facial height to be a suitable criterion for craniofacial superimposition (at least as a starting point for method improvement), and that image registration should be point-based using a sellion/nasion combination to minimize anatomical misalignment in the principal region-of-interest (the mid-face).