Preoperative breast magnetic resonance imaging in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ: a systematic review for the European Commission Initiative on Breast Cancer (ECIBC)

• Published in: European radiology Vol. 31; no. 8; pp. 5880 - 5893
• Main Authors: Canelo-Aybar, Carlos, Taype-Rondan, Alvaro, Zafra-Tanaka, Jessica Hanae, Rigau, David, Graewingholt, Axel, Lebeau, Annette, Pérez Gómez, Elsa, Rossi, Paolo Giorgi, Langendam, Miranda, Posso, Margarita, Parmelli, Elena, Saz-Parkinson, Zuleika, Alonso-Coello, Pablo
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Berlin/Heidelberg Springer Berlin Heidelberg 01-08-2021; Springer Nature B.V
• Subjects: Breast; Breast cancer; Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging; Breast Neoplasms - surgery; Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating; Clinical trials; Diagnostic Radiology; Evaluation; Female; Humans; Imaging; Internal Medicine; Interventional Radiology; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Mastectomy, Segmental; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - diagnostic imaging; Neuroradiology; Patients; Radiology; Risk assessment; Surgery; Surgical outcomes; Ultrasound; Magnetic resonance imaging; Ductal carcinoma in situ; Breast cancer
• ISSN: 0938-7994; 1432-1084
• DOI: 10.1007/s00330-021-07873-2

Objective
To evaluate the impact of preoperative MRI in the management of Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS).
Methods
We searched the PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library databases to identify randomised clinical trials (RCTs) or cohort studies assessing the impact of preoperative breast MRI in surgical outcomes, treatment change or loco-regional recurrence. We provided pooled estimates for odds ratios (OR), relative risks (RR) and proportions and assessed the certainty of the evidence using the GRADE approach.
Results
We included 3 RCTs and 23 observational cohorts, corresponding to 20,415 patients. For initial breast-conserving surgery (BCS), the RCTs showed that MRI may result in little to no difference (RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.90 to 1.00) (low certainty); observational studies showed that MRI may have no difference in the odds of re-operation after BCS (OR 0.96; 95% CI 0.36 to 2.61) (low certainty); and uncertain evidence from RCTs suggests little to no difference with respect to total mastectomy rate (RR 0.91; 95% CI 0.65 to 1.27) (very low certainty). We also found that MRI may change the initial treatment plans in 17% (95% CI 12 to 24%) of cases, but with little to no effect on locoregional recurrence (aHR = 1.18; 95% CI 0.79 to 1.76) (very low certainty).
Conclusion
We found evidence of low to very low certainty which may suggest there is no improvement of surgical outcomes with pre-operative MRI assessment of women with DCIS lesions. There is a need for large rigorously conducted RCTs to evaluate the role of preoperative MRI in this population.
Key Points
• Evidence of low to very low certainty may suggest there is no improvement in surgical outcomes with pre-operative MRI.
• There is a need for large rigorously conducted RCTs evaluating the role of preoperative MRI to improve treatment planning for DCIS.