Trends in data quality and quality indicators 5 years after implementation of the Dutch Hip Fracture Audit

• Published in: European journal of trauma and emergency surgery (Munich : 2007) Vol. 48; no. 6; pp. 4783 - 4796
• Main Authors: Würdemann, F. S., Krijnen, P., van Zwet, E. W., Arends, A. J., Heetveld, M. J., Trappenburg, M. C., Hegeman, J. H., Schipper, I. B.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Berlin/Heidelberg Springer Berlin Heidelberg 01-12-2022; Springer Nature B.V
• Subjects: Critical Care Medicine; Emergency medical care; Emergency Medicine; Fractures; Hip joint; Intensive; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Mortality; Original; Original Article; Orthopedics; Osteoporosis; Registration; Sports Medicine; Surgery; Surgical Orthopedics; Traumatic Surgery; Trends; Quality indicators; Registries; Hip fractures; Clinical auditing
• ISSN: 1863-9933; 1863-9941
• DOI: 10.1007/s00068-022-02012-y

Purpose
The Dutch Hip Fracture Audit (DHFA), a nationwide hip fracture registry in the Netherlands, registers hip fracture patients and aims to improve quality of care since 2016. This study shows trends in the data quality during the first 5 years of data acquisition within the DHFA, as well as trends over time for designated quality indicators (QI).
Methods
All patients registered in the DHFA between 1-1-2016 and 31-12-2020 were included. Data quality-registry case coverage and data completeness-and baseline characteristics are reported. Five QI are analysed: Time to surgery < 48 h, assessment for osteoporosis, orthogeriatric co-management, registration of functional outcomes at three months, 30-day mortality. The independent association between QI results and report year was tested using mixed-effects logistic models and in the case of 30-day mortality adjusted for casemix.
Results
In 2020, the case capture of the DHFA comprised 85% of the Dutch hip fracture patients, 66/68 hospitals participated. The average of missing clinical values was 7.5% in 2016 and 3.2% in 2020. The 3 months follow-up completeness was 36.2% (2016) and 46.8% (2020). The QI ‘time to surgery’ was consistently high, assessment for osteoporosis remained low, orthogeriatric co-management scores increased without significance, registration of functional outcomes improved significantly and 30-day mortality rates remained unchanged.
Conclusion
The DHFA has successfully been implemented in the past five years. Trends show improvement on data quality. Analysis of several QI indicate points of attention. Future perspectives include lowering the burden of registration, whilst improving (registration of) hip fracture patients outcomes.