Intraoperative Assessment of Stability in Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Novel Method Utilizing Implant Collinearity

Hip dislocation remains a leading cause of revision following total hip arthroplasty, and intraoperative assessment of acetabular positioning can be difficult to perform. There are multiple clinical tests, as well as computer and robotic techniques, that aim to reduce dislocation rates after hip art...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Arthroplasty today Vol. 25; p. 101282
Main Authors: Underwood, Nathan T., Madurawe, Chameka, Ashton, Lyal A.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: United States Elsevier Inc 01-02-2024
Elsevier
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Hip dislocation remains a leading cause of revision following total hip arthroplasty, and intraoperative assessment of acetabular positioning can be difficult to perform. There are multiple clinical tests, as well as computer and robotic techniques, that aim to reduce dislocation rates after hip arthroplasty. These approaches aim to optimize the relationship between acetabular and femoral component positioning. It is hypothesized in this study that implant collinearity assessment intraoperatively can help determine appropriate acetabular component position. More specifically, implant collinearity, when achieved with a specific leg position, can reliably predict appropriate acetabular positioning. A single-surgeon, single-centered study with 55 patients was undertaken between August 2017 and March 2020. Using preoperative imaging and computer simulation, data points were taken for 3 different acetabular configurations and comparing using 2 femoral positions. The angle differences from the collinear position (0 degrees) were compared between groups. A total of 55 patients’ imaging was analyzed using 3 acetabular configurations and 2 femoral positions. The test leg position (30-degree flexion/30-degree internal rotation/10-degree adduction) was closer to collinearity than the control position (30-degree flexion/30-degree internal rotation/0-degree adduction) in all 3 acetabular configurations by a mean of 8 degrees (P < .001), 7 degrees (P < .001), and 4 degrees (P < .001), respectively. The use of a 10-degree adducted position more reliably recreates implant collinearity when determining acetabular positioning during total hip arthroplasty. This intraoperative test adds another data point to assist the surgeon in achieving safe component positioning.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:2352-3441
2352-3441
DOI:10.1016/j.artd.2023.101282