Environmental life cycle assessment of cereal and bread production in Norway

We assessed the environmental impacts of producing bread, as delivered to the consumer, assuming the use of Norwegian ingredients only. Ten impact categories, including global warming potential (GWP), were quantified by mixed modelling and life cycle assessment. Firstly, we quantified the impacts of...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Acta agriculturae Scandinavica. Section A, Animal science Vol. 62; no. 4; pp. 242 - 253
Main Authors: Korsaeth, A, Jacobsen, A. Z, Roer, A.-G, Henriksen, T. M, Sonesson, U, Bonesmo, H, Skjelvåg, A. O, Strømman, A. H
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Abingdon Taylor & Francis Group 01-12-2012
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:We assessed the environmental impacts of producing bread, as delivered to the consumer, assuming the use of Norwegian ingredients only. Ten impact categories, including global warming potential (GWP), were quantified by mixed modelling and life cycle assessment. Firstly, we quantified the impacts of growing barley, oats, winter and spring wheat on 93 farms that were representative of the main cereal production regions in Norway. We used wide system boundaries, which included all relevant processes occurring both pre-farm and on-farm. Secondly, we assessed a representative production chain for bread, including transport, milling, baking and packing processes. On-farm processes accounted for a large share of the environmental impacts attributable to the production of bread (e.g. 50% for GWP). There is thus considerable potential for environmental improvements through changes in farm management. In total, the GWP per kg of bread (freshweight) was 0.95 kg CO₂-equivalent. The environmental footprint of transport was small.
Bibliography:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09064702.2013.783619
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1651-1972
0906-4702
1651-1972
DOI:10.1080/09064702.2013.783619