Investigative science and technology supporting the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW)

• Published in: Australian journal of forensic sciences Vol. 51; no. 6; pp. 611 - 622
• Main Authors: Borrett, Veronica, Timperley, Christopher M., Forman, Jonathan E., Tang, Cheng
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Clovelly Taylor & Francis 02-11-2019; Copyright Agency Limited (Distributor)
• Subjects: Biological & chemical weapons; Chemical agents (Munitions); Chemical forensics; CHEMICAL WARFARE; Chemical warfare agents; Chemical weapons; Chemical Weapons Convention; Contingency; Data processing; Disarmament; Electron spectroscopy; FORENSIC SCIENCE; Forensic sciences; investigative science and technology; Prohibition; SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY; Technology; TERRORISM; Verification; Weapons
• ISSN: 0045-0618; 1834-562X
• DOI: 10.1080/00450618.2018.1559356

The Chemical Weapons Convention (hereinafter 'the Convention'), an international disarmament and non-proliferation treaty, entered into force in 1997. It prohibits the development, stockpiling, transfer and use of chemical weapons. Today there are 193 nations ('States Parties') that are members. The Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW), in The Hague, is the implementing body of the Convention. Herein we outline the verification regime of the Convention and how the work of the OPCW has evolved in recent years in response to the use of chemical warfare agents (CWAs), as well as potential impacts from advances in science and technology (S&T). We describe challenges recognized from recent contingency operations in response to the use of CWAs and how S&T might support the development of safe and effective approaches to verification. The role of OPCW's Scientific Advisory Board and its Temporary Working Group on Investigative Science and Technology are discussed; specifically, how scientific advice supports the development of the capability for the verification of alleged use of CWAs, as well as informing the decisions made by policymakers. The importance of engagement with forensic agencies for the continuing development of state-of-the-art approaches to verification is highlighted.