Attitudes and practices of ophthalmology doctors in London (UK) on the importance of discussing work as a clinical outcome with patients during consultations: A cross sectional survey

• Published in: PloS one Vol. 17; no. 6; p. e0268997
• Main Authors: Kuncewicz, Katherine, Schiff, Isabelle, Liszka, Jaroslaw, Akinfie, Sheni, McLurcan, Nadia, Madan, Ira, Naleem, Shairana, Parsons, Vaughan
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Public Library of Science 09-06-2022; Public Library of Science (PLoS)
• Subjects: Attitudes; Behavior; Biology and Life Sciences; Certification; Clinical outcomes; Cross-sectional studies; Data analysis; Medical personnel; Medicine; Medicine and Health Sciences; Mental health; Occupational health; Occupations; Ophthalmology; Patients; People and Places; Physicians; Practice; Questionnaires; Reforms; Research and Analysis Methods; Social Sciences; Surveys; Training; United Kingdom; United Kingdom > UK
• ISSN: 1932-6203; 1932-6203
• DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268997

Limited research suggests that non-occupational health doctors rarely discuss occupation with their patients. There is a gap in research regarding the attitudes and practices of doctors towards discussing patient occupation and return to work. The aim of this work was to explore the attitudes of ophthalmology doctors towards work as a clinical outcome and assess the need for occupational health training among participants (doctors).
A cross-sectional survey among doctors working in ophthalmology in two London teaching hospitals. The survey focused on the attitudes of doctors towards 'work' as a clinical outcome, their practices of asking patients about occupation, their perceived level of competency in this area of clinical practice and the level of training doctors had received in this field. Descriptive data analysis was undertaken and results presented as frequencies and proportions.
The response rate was 30/72 (42%). Approximately a quarter (8/30;27%) of doctors 'always' discussed return to work during care planning whilst the majority (25/30;87%) of doctors agreed or strongly agreed that this should always be the case. Over half of the doctors had received no formal OH training on how to discuss or assess the impact of health on work and only 17/30 (57%) considered themselves competent in discussing these work outcomes with patients. Over half agreed that additional training would be useful, with the majority believing that it would be most useful at all stages of medical training.
We found the majority of ophthalmology doctors regard 'return to work' as an important clinical outcome yet most do not routinely discuss work outcomes with patients to inform care planning. Majority of doctors lack training in how to discuss issues relating to work and would benefit from additional OH training.