The Swedish green infrastructure policy as a policy assemblage: What does it do for biodiversity conservation?
Green infrastructure (GI) is increasingly used in policymaking to promote biodiversity and enhance ecosystem services through the protection, creation, restoration and connection of natural and man‐made green areas. The EU Commission adopted in 2013, the concept as a strategy. When member states app...
Saved in:
Published in: | People and nature (Hoboken, N.J.) Vol. 5; no. 2; pp. 839 - 851 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
London
John Wiley & Sons, Inc
01-04-2023
Wiley |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Abstract | Green infrastructure (GI) is increasingly used in policymaking to promote biodiversity and enhance ecosystem services through the protection, creation, restoration and connection of natural and man‐made green areas.
The EU Commission adopted in 2013, the concept as a strategy. When member states apply the policy, it is translated into specific bureaucratic and political systems, creating different ‘policy assemblages’ of ideas and institutional features.
We analyse the Swedish GI policy to draw conclusions about how it has been assembled in one particular member state and what that particular assemblage will imply for biodiversity conservation. In combination with understanding policies as assemblages, we use the ‘What's the problem represented to be’‐approach as method.
We show that the Swedish GI policy assemblage consists of a mix of policy ideas developed in Sweden and the EU. Despite the current strong focus on biodiversity conservation, the notion of land's multifunctionality, characterizing the EU strategy and the possibility to conserve biodiversity on land used for purposes other than conservation increasingly influence the Swedish policy as it is formed.
Although the policy has the potential to mainstream biodiversity conservation measures across different sectors, based on our analysis of current discourse, its implementation will likely promote GI measures less disruptive to existing land use activities, making its capacity to halt biodiversity loss marginal.
Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.
Sammanfattning
Grön infrastruktur (GI) tillämpas allt oftare i policysammanhang i syfte att främja biologisk mångfald och stärka ekosystemtjänster genom att skydda, skapa, restaurera och sammanlänka naturliga och mänskligt anlagda gröna miljöer.
EU kommissionen antog 2013 konceptet som en strategi. När medlemsstater tillämpar policyn, sker en tolkning till specifika byråkratiska och politiska system, vilket leder till olika policysammansättningar av ideér och institutionella egenheter.
Vi analyserar den svenska policyn för grön infrastruktur för att dra slutsatser om hur policyn har satts ihop i en specifik medlemsstat och vad den kan medföra gällande bevarande av biologisk mångfald. Vi kombinerar förståelse av policys som en assemblage och metoden ‘What's the problem represented to be’ för att analysera materialet.
Vi visar att den svenska policysammansättningen består av en blandning av policyideér som utvecklats i Sverige och i EU. Trots det nuvarande starka fokuset på bevarande av biologisk mångfald, har ideér om multifunktionella landskap vilket karaktäriserar EU policyn, fått ett ökande inflytande på den svenska policyn, allt eftersom den utvecklas.
Även om policyn hyser potential att öka medvetenheten om behovet av bevarandeåtgärder för biologisk mångfald inom olika sektorer, visar vår analys av nuvarande diskurs att implementering av policyn troligt kommer att leda till bevarandeåtgärder med liten inverkan på nuvarande markanvändning, och därmed blir dess kapacitet att hindra förlust av biologisk mångfald marginell.
Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Green infrastructure (GI) is increasingly used in policymaking to promote biodiversity and enhance ecosystem services through the protection, creation, restoration and connection of natural and man‐made green areas.
The EU Commission adopted in 2013, the concept as a strategy. When member states apply the policy, it is translated into specific bureaucratic and political systems, creating different ‘policy assemblages’ of ideas and institutional features.
We analyse the Swedish GI policy to draw conclusions about how it has been assembled in one particular member state and what that particular assemblage will imply for biodiversity conservation. In combination with understanding policies as assemblages, we use the ‘What's the problem represented to be’‐approach as method.
We show that the Swedish GI policy assemblage consists of a mix of policy ideas developed in Sweden and the EU. Despite the current strong focus on biodiversity conservation, the notion of land's multifunctionality, characterizing the EU strategy and the possibility to conserve biodiversity on land used for purposes other than conservation increasingly influence the Swedish policy as it is formed.
Although the policy has the potential to mainstream biodiversity conservation measures across different sectors, based on our analysis of current discourse, its implementation will likely promote GI measures less disruptive to existing land use activities, making its capacity to halt biodiversity loss marginal.
Read the free
Plain Language Summary
for this article on the Journal blog.
Grön infrastruktur (GI) tillämpas allt oftare i policysammanhang i syfte att främja biologisk mångfald och stärka ekosystemtjänster genom att skydda, skapa, restaurera och sammanlänka naturliga och mänskligt anlagda gröna miljöer.
EU kommissionen antog 2013 konceptet som en strategi. När medlemsstater tillämpar policyn, sker en tolkning till specifika byråkratiska och politiska system, vilket leder till olika policysammansättningar av ideér och institutionella egenheter.
Vi analyserar den svenska policyn för grön infrastruktur för att dra slutsatser om hur policyn har satts ihop i en specifik medlemsstat och vad den kan medföra gällande bevarande av biologisk mångfald. Vi kombinerar förståelse av policys som en assemblage och metoden ‘What's the problem represented to be’ för att analysera materialet.
Vi visar att den svenska policysammansättningen består av en blandning av policyideér som utvecklats i Sverige och i EU. Trots det nuvarande starka fokuset på bevarande av biologisk mångfald, har ideér om multifunktionella landskap vilket karaktäriserar EU policyn, fått ett ökande inflytande på den svenska policyn, allt eftersom den utvecklas.
Även om policyn hyser potential att öka medvetenheten om behovet av bevarandeåtgärder för biologisk mångfald inom olika sektorer, visar vår analys av nuvarande diskurs att implementering av policyn troligt kommer att leda till bevarandeåtgärder med liten inverkan på nuvarande markanvändning, och därmed blir dess kapacitet att hindra förlust av biologisk mångfald marginell.
Read the free
Plain Language Summary
for this article on the Journal blog. Abstract Green infrastructure (GI) is increasingly used in policymaking to promote biodiversity and enhance ecosystem services through the protection, creation, restoration and connection of natural and man‐made green areas. The EU Commission adopted in 2013, the concept as a strategy. When member states apply the policy, it is translated into specific bureaucratic and political systems, creating different ‘policy assemblages’ of ideas and institutional features. We analyse the Swedish GI policy to draw conclusions about how it has been assembled in one particular member state and what that particular assemblage will imply for biodiversity conservation. In combination with understanding policies as assemblages, we use the ‘What's the problem represented to be’‐approach as method. We show that the Swedish GI policy assemblage consists of a mix of policy ideas developed in Sweden and the EU. Despite the current strong focus on biodiversity conservation, the notion of land's multifunctionality, characterizing the EU strategy and the possibility to conserve biodiversity on land used for purposes other than conservation increasingly influence the Swedish policy as it is formed. Although the policy has the potential to mainstream biodiversity conservation measures across different sectors, based on our analysis of current discourse, its implementation will likely promote GI measures less disruptive to existing land use activities, making its capacity to halt biodiversity loss marginal. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog. Green infrastructure (GI) is increasingly used in policymaking to promote biodiversity and enhance ecosystem services through the protection, creation, restoration and connection of natural and man-made green areas.The EU Commission adopted in 2013, the concept as a strategy. When member states apply the policy, it is translated into specific bureaucratic and political systems, creating different ‘policy assemblages’ of ideas and institutional features.We analyse the Swedish GI policy to draw conclusions about how it has been assembled in one particular member state and what that particular assemblage will imply for biodiversity conservation. In combination with understanding policies as assemblages, we use the ‘What's the problem represented to be’-approach as method.We show that the Swedish GI policy assemblage consists of a mix of policy ideas developed in Sweden and the EU. Despite the current strong focus on biodiversity conservation, the notion of land's multifunctionality, characterizing the EU strategy and the possibility to conserve biodiversity on land used for purposes other than conservation increasingly influence the Swedish policy as it is formed.Although the policy has the potential to mainstream biodiversity conservation measures across different sectors, based on our analysis of current discourse, its implementation will likely promote GI measures less disruptive to existing land use activities, making its capacity to halt biodiversity loss marginal.Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog. Green infrastructure (GI) is increasingly used in policymaking to promote biodiversity and enhance ecosystem services through the protection, creation, restoration and connection of natural and man‐made green areas. The EU Commission adopted in 2013, the concept as a strategy. When member states apply the policy, it is translated into specific bureaucratic and political systems, creating different ‘policy assemblages’ of ideas and institutional features. We analyse the Swedish GI policy to draw conclusions about how it has been assembled in one particular member state and what that particular assemblage will imply for biodiversity conservation. In combination with understanding policies as assemblages, we use the ‘What's the problem represented to be’‐approach as method. We show that the Swedish GI policy assemblage consists of a mix of policy ideas developed in Sweden and the EU. Despite the current strong focus on biodiversity conservation, the notion of land's multifunctionality, characterizing the EU strategy and the possibility to conserve biodiversity on land used for purposes other than conservation increasingly influence the Swedish policy as it is formed. Although the policy has the potential to mainstream biodiversity conservation measures across different sectors, based on our analysis of current discourse, its implementation will likely promote GI measures less disruptive to existing land use activities, making its capacity to halt biodiversity loss marginal. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog. Sammanfattning Grön infrastruktur (GI) tillämpas allt oftare i policysammanhang i syfte att främja biologisk mångfald och stärka ekosystemtjänster genom att skydda, skapa, restaurera och sammanlänka naturliga och mänskligt anlagda gröna miljöer. EU kommissionen antog 2013 konceptet som en strategi. När medlemsstater tillämpar policyn, sker en tolkning till specifika byråkratiska och politiska system, vilket leder till olika policysammansättningar av ideér och institutionella egenheter. Vi analyserar den svenska policyn för grön infrastruktur för att dra slutsatser om hur policyn har satts ihop i en specifik medlemsstat och vad den kan medföra gällande bevarande av biologisk mångfald. Vi kombinerar förståelse av policys som en assemblage och metoden ‘What's the problem represented to be’ för att analysera materialet. Vi visar att den svenska policysammansättningen består av en blandning av policyideér som utvecklats i Sverige och i EU. Trots det nuvarande starka fokuset på bevarande av biologisk mångfald, har ideér om multifunktionella landskap vilket karaktäriserar EU policyn, fått ett ökande inflytande på den svenska policyn, allt eftersom den utvecklas. Även om policyn hyser potential att öka medvetenheten om behovet av bevarandeåtgärder för biologisk mångfald inom olika sektorer, visar vår analys av nuvarande diskurs att implementering av policyn troligt kommer att leda till bevarandeåtgärder med liten inverkan på nuvarande markanvändning, och därmed blir dess kapacitet att hindra förlust av biologisk mångfald marginell. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog. |
Author | Alkan Olsson, Johanna Ekroos, Johan Post, Maria Knaggård, Åsa Olsson, Ola Persson, Anna Sofie |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Maria orcidid: 0000-0002-4571-7983 surname: Post fullname: Post, Maria email: maria.von_post@biol.lu.se organization: Lund University – sequence: 2 givenname: Åsa orcidid: 0000-0001-5239-5399 surname: Knaggård fullname: Knaggård, Åsa organization: Lund University – sequence: 3 givenname: Johanna orcidid: 0000-0003-0633-4303 surname: Alkan Olsson fullname: Alkan Olsson, Johanna organization: Lund University – sequence: 4 givenname: Ola orcidid: 0000-0003-0789-1064 surname: Olsson fullname: Olsson, Ola organization: Lund University – sequence: 5 givenname: Anna Sofie orcidid: 0000-0002-2711-0344 surname: Persson fullname: Persson, Anna Sofie organization: Lund University – sequence: 6 givenname: Johan orcidid: 0000-0003-1164-5472 surname: Ekroos fullname: Ekroos, Johan organization: University of Helsinki |
BackLink | https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/fded67a8-32aa-499c-acf8-806f9db1d565$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index |
BookMark | eNp9kV1rFDEUhgepYK298RcEvBO2ZvI5442UorWwaKEVL8NJcmY3y3QyJjNd9t-b7YgfN0IO5yW8eQ4n78vqZIgDVtXrml7UlLJ3Iwy8KCHVs-qUSS1XDa_FyV_6RXWe844WM625Evy0Gu63SO726EPekk1CHEgYugR5SrOb5oRkjH1wBwKZwB-d8cH2sMH35PsWJuIjZhKOnXQxERuiD4-YcpgOxMUhY3qEKcThw6vqeQd9xvNf_az69unj_dXn1frr9c3V5XrlhGZqJSTV3CkEaDTVUjkhvaOoVNsJoLpBTluPrGnLYtaDakUrbKe9LodJZ_lZdbNwfYSdGVN4gHQwEYJ5uohpYyBNwfVoOlYj08oyBVIoactEAGTSW-yUdHVhrRdW3uM4239o_TyWsqVMLiiPXmloDGcARrStM-C6xjRUda23tZdKFtybBTem-GPGPJldnNNQfsMw3fJGyZry4nq7uFyKOSfsfo-tqTmmbY5pm6e0i7lezPvQ4-E_TnN7-YUvb34CMQSuLg |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1002_eet_2091 crossref_primary_10_1093_ips_olae002 |
Cites_doi | 10.1016/j.biocon.2014.02.013 10.1093/oso/9780198540663.001.0001 10.1111/j.1478‐9302.2012.00276.x 10.1016/j.jnc.2008.12.006 10.1111/1365‐2664.13196 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103838 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2021.104145 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.05.006 10.1080/15239080701631544 10.3389/fevo.2015.00145 10.1080/14615517.2019.1617517 10.1002/fee.2445 10.1111/gcb.14503 10.1016/j.biocon.2018.03.001 10.1111/j.0030-1299.2008.16215.x 10.1016/j.geoforum.2010.01.002 10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.10.003 10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.05.013 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.10.005 10.1017/S003060531200172X 10.1111/ddi.12324 10.1007/s10113‐014‐0690‐0 10.1007/s42977‐020‐00015‐7 10.1111/j.1365‐2664.2010.01919.x 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.02.014 10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.04.003 10.1007/s13280‐014‐0510‐2 10.1177/0263774X15614726 10.1146/annurev.es.20.110189.001131 10.1080/21622671.2018.1559760 10.1016/j.biocon.2015.08.015 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141589 10.1002/ecs2.2582 10.1126/science.1111772 10.1038/ncomms13106 10.1093/jopart/mur011 10.1068/c11292 10.1080/09640568.2019.1688651 10.5771/9783845280639-23 10.1111/conl.12225 10.1177/0263774X15605939 10.1177/1078087407304689 10.1080/13501763.2017.1314541 10.5751/ES-01819-110216 10.1579/0044‐7447‐32.6.389 10.1080/13549839.2011.631993 10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.11.001 10.3390/land8040062 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.05.008 10.1108/QRJ‐12‐2018‐0004 10.1016/j.tree.2015.01.011 10.1057/978-1-137-52546-8 10.1890/12‐1472.1 10.1080/19460171.2013.784624 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2023 The Authors. published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Ecological Society. 2023. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2023 The Authors. published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Ecological Society. – notice: 2023. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. |
DBID | 24P WIN AAYXX CITATION ABUWG AFKRA ATCPS AZQEC BENPR BHPHI CCPQU DWQXO GNUQQ HCIFZ PATMY PIMPY PQEST PQQKQ PQUKI PYCSY ADTPV AGCHP AOWAS D8T D95 ZZAVC DOA |
DOI | 10.1002/pan3.10456 |
DatabaseName | Open Access: Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Journals Wiley Online Library Open Access CrossRef ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest Central Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Central Natural Science Collection ProQuest One Community College ProQuest Central ProQuest Central Student SciTech Premium Collection Environmental Science Database Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition Environmental Science Collection SwePub SWEPUB Lunds universitet full text SwePub Articles SWEPUB Freely available online SWEPUB Lunds universitet SwePub Articles full text DOAJ |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest Central Student ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) SciTech Premium Collection ProQuest One Community College ProQuest Central Environmental Science Collection ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition Natural Science Collection ProQuest Central Korea Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection Environmental Science Database ProQuest One Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | CrossRef Publicly Available Content Database |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: DOA name: Directory of Open Access Journals url: http://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Anthropology Ecology Political Science |
EISSN | 2575-8314 |
EndPage | 851 |
ExternalDocumentID | oai_doaj_org_article_f21e276b26a5465b870aae25dbef65c1 oai_lup_lub_lu_se_fded67a8_32aa_499c_acf8_806f9db1d565 10_1002_pan3_10456 PAN310456 |
Genre | researchArticle |
GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: Lund University – fundername: Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas funderid: 2019‐01008; 2019‐01524 – fundername: Biodiversity and Ecosystem services in a Changing Climate, Strategic research area |
GroupedDBID | 0R~ 1OC 24P AAHHS ACCFJ ACXQS ADBBV ADKYN ADZMN AEEZP AEQDE AFKRA AIWBW AJBDE ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ATCPS AVUZU BCNDV BENPR BHPHI CCPQU EBS EDH EJD GROUPED_DOAJ HCIFZ IAO IGS M~E OK1 PATMY PIMPY PYCSY WIN AAYXX CITATION ITC ABUWG AZQEC DWQXO GNUQQ PQEST PQQKQ PQUKI ADTPV AGCHP AOWAS D8T D95 ZZAVC |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c4726-45073c6eaa870756c45dc0e669f4a078e309de289575bda69494bf7d77d725cb3 |
IEDL.DBID | DOA |
ISSN | 2575-8314 |
IngestDate | Tue Oct 22 15:16:34 EDT 2024 Tue Oct 01 22:49:50 EDT 2024 Mon Nov 11 09:34:56 EST 2024 Fri Nov 22 00:25:38 EST 2024 Sat Aug 24 00:55:48 EDT 2024 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 2 |
Language | English |
License | Attribution |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c4726-45073c6eaa870756c45dc0e669f4a078e309de289575bda69494bf7d77d725cb3 |
ORCID | 0000-0003-0633-4303 0000-0003-1164-5472 0000-0001-5239-5399 0000-0002-2711-0344 0000-0003-0789-1064 0000-0002-4571-7983 |
OpenAccessLink | https://doaj.org/article/f21e276b26a5465b870aae25dbef65c1 |
PQID | 2793865103 |
PQPubID | 4570187 |
PageCount | 13 |
ParticipantIDs | doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_f21e276b26a5465b870aae25dbef65c1 swepub_primary_oai_lup_lub_lu_se_fded67a8_32aa_499c_acf8_806f9db1d565 proquest_journals_2793865103 crossref_primary_10_1002_pan3_10456 wiley_primary_10_1002_pan3_10456_PAN310456 |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | April 2023 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2023-04-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 04 year: 2023 text: April 2023 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationPlace | London |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: London |
PublicationTitle | People and nature (Hoboken, N.J.) |
PublicationYear | 2023 |
Publisher | John Wiley & Sons, Inc Wiley |
Publisher_xml | – name: John Wiley & Sons, Inc – name: Wiley |
References | 2020; 63 2019; 98 2019; 10 2013; 23 2017; 87 2015; 30 2015; 33 2019; 19 2014; 172 2022; 20 2020; 202 2015b 2013; 7 2011; 16 2012; 10 2016; 34 1977 2020; 8 2000 2009b 2009a 2007; 9 2011; 22 2008; 117 2005; 309 2014; 9 2009; 17 2019; 8 2018; 29 2018; 221 2015; 15 2018; 220 2013; 47 1989; 20 2013; 109 2012 2011 2010 2006; 11 2017; 24 2009 2011; 31 2020; 38 1996 2006 2005 1992 2010; 41 2003; 32 2016; 56 2014; 43 2018; 25 2020; 748 1999 2016; 7 2015; 192 2016; 3 2015a 2021 2021; 214 2020; 71 2017; 10 2015; 21 2019 2018 2017 2016 2008; 43 2015 2014 2011; 48 2013 2018; 55 e_1_2_9_75_1 e_1_2_9_52_1 Benedict M. A. (e_1_2_9_8_1) 2006 e_1_2_9_73_1 e_1_2_9_79_1 e_1_2_9_10_1 e_1_2_9_56_1 e_1_2_9_12_1 e_1_2_9_54_1 Directive 92/43/EEC. (e_1_2_9_25_1) 1992 e_1_2_9_71_1 Blackmore J. (e_1_2_9_11_1) 2005 e_1_2_9_14_1 e_1_2_9_16_1 e_1_2_9_37_1 Salomaa A. (e_1_2_9_77_1) 2017 e_1_2_9_18_1 Escobar A. (e_1_2_9_33_1) 1996 e_1_2_9_41_1 e_1_2_9_64_1 e_1_2_9_20_1 Governmental Commission (e_1_2_9_47_1) 2012 e_1_2_9_62_1 e_1_2_9_22_1 e_1_2_9_68_1 e_1_2_9_24_1 e_1_2_9_66_1 e_1_2_9_85_1 e_1_2_9_6_1 IPBES (e_1_2_9_58_1) 2019 e_1_2_9_81_1 e_1_2_9_4_1 EPA (e_1_2_9_30_1) 2015 e_1_2_9_60_1 UN (e_1_2_9_83_1) 2014 e_1_2_9_2_1 Governmental Appropriation Directions (e_1_2_9_43_1) 2015 Governmental Bill (e_1_2_9_45_1) 2009 e_1_2_9_26_1 e_1_2_9_28_1 European Commission (e_1_2_9_36_1) 2013 e_1_2_9_74_1 e_1_2_9_51_1 Hanski I. (e_1_2_9_55_1) 1999 e_1_2_9_57_1 e_1_2_9_78_1 e_1_2_9_13_1 e_1_2_9_32_1 e_1_2_9_76_1 Governmental Regulation (e_1_2_9_50_1) 2018 Bacchi C. (e_1_2_9_5_1) 2009 e_1_2_9_70_1 Dasgupta P. (e_1_2_9_21_1) 2021 e_1_2_9_15_1 European Commission (e_1_2_9_34_1) 2009 e_1_2_9_38_1 e_1_2_9_17_1 e_1_2_9_59_1 Governmental Commission (e_1_2_9_48_1) 2013 e_1_2_9_19_1 Governmental Commission (e_1_2_9_46_1) 2010 e_1_2_9_40_1 e_1_2_9_61_1 European Commission (e_1_2_9_35_1) 2011 e_1_2_9_67_1 e_1_2_9_84_1 e_1_2_9_23_1 Hall P. (e_1_2_9_53_1) 2015 e_1_2_9_65_1 e_1_2_9_7_1 Governmental Commission (e_1_2_9_49_1) 2014 e_1_2_9_80_1 e_1_2_9_82_1 e_1_2_9_3_1 Foucault M. (e_1_2_9_39_1) 1977 EPA (e_1_2_9_31_1) 2017 e_1_2_9_9_1 Governmental Bill (e_1_2_9_44_1) 2009 e_1_2_9_27_1 Lawton J. H. (e_1_2_9_63_1) 2010 e_1_2_9_69_1 Governmental Appropriation Directions (e_1_2_9_42_1) 2015 e_1_2_9_29_1 Nordström J. (e_1_2_9_72_1) 2021 |
References_xml | – year: 2011 – year: 2009 – volume: 220 start-page: 36 year: 2018 end-page: 43 article-title: Accounting for no net loss: A critical assessment of biodiversity offsetting metrics and methods publication-title: Journal of Environmental Management – volume: 43 start-page: 299 year: 2008 end-page: 324 article-title: Whose responsibility? Swedish local decision makers and the scale of climate change abatement publication-title: Urban Affairs Review – year: 2005 – volume: 19 start-page: 185 issue: 2 year: 2019 end-page: 198 article-title: A critical discourse problematization framework for (disability) policy analysis: ‘Good cop/bad cop’ strategy publication-title: Qualitative Research Journal – volume: 10 issue: 2 year: 2019 article-title: Grasslands—More important for ecosystem services than you might think publication-title: Ecosphere – volume: 7 start-page: 99 issue: 2 year: 2013 end-page: 114 article-title: Sovereign power beyond the state: A critical reappraisal of governance by networks publication-title: Critical Policy Studies – volume: 7 year: 2016 article-title: Disaggergating the evidence linking biodiversity and ecosystem services publication-title: Nature Communications – volume: 30 start-page: 190 issue: 4 year: 2015 end-page: 198 article-title: Reframing landscape fragmentation's effects on ecosystem services publication-title: Trends in Ecology & Evolution – year: 2021 – volume: 109 start-page: 7 issue: 1 year: 2013 end-page: 17 article-title: The social production of ecosystem services: A framework for studying environmental justice and ecological complexity in urbanized landscapes publication-title: Landscape and Urban Planning – volume: 56 start-page: 315 year: 2016 end-page: 319 article-title: Biodiversity and green infrastructure in Europe: Boundary object or ecological trap? publication-title: Land Use Policy – volume: 117 start-page: 507 issue: 4 year: 2008 end-page: 514 article-title: Distribution of specialist and generalist species along spatial gradients of habitat disturbance and fragmentation publication-title: Oikos – volume: 34 start-page: 478 issue: 3 year: 2016 end-page: 495 article-title: Institutionalization or wither away? Twenty‐five years of environmental policy integration under shifting governance models in Sweden publication-title: Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy – year: 2009b – volume: 48 start-page: 148 issue: 1 year: 2011 end-page: 152 article-title: Habitat area, quality and connectivity: Striking the balance for efficient conservation publication-title: Journal of Applied Ecology – volume: 31 start-page: 36 year: 2011 end-page: 44 article-title: Walking in ‘wild’ and ‘tended’ urban forests: The impact on psychological well‐being publication-title: Journal of Environmental Psychology – volume: 33 start-page: 1039 issue: 5 year: 2015 end-page: 1057 article-title: Explaining the currency of novel policy concepts: Learning from green infrastructure planning publication-title: Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy – year: 2018 – volume: 21 start-page: 1204 year: 2015 end-page: 1217 article-title: Local and landscape managementdrive trait‐mediated biodiversity of nine taxa on small grassland fragments publication-title: Diversity and Distributions – year: 2014 – volume: 25 start-page: 536 issue: 2 year: 2018 end-page: 548 article-title: Trade‐offs between carbon stocks and biodiversity in European temperate forests publication-title: Global Change Biology – volume: 41 start-page: 169 issue: 2 year: 2010 end-page: 174 article-title: Mobilizing policy: Models, methods, and mutations publication-title: Geoforum – volume: 202 year: 2020 article-title: Sweden does not meet agreed national and international forest biodiversity targets: A call for adaptive landscape planning publication-title: Landscape and Urban Planning – volume: 9 start-page: 191 year: 2014 end-page: 203 article-title: Linkages between biodiversity attributes and ecosystem services: A systematic review publication-title: Ecosystem services – volume: 47 start-page: 369 year: 2013 end-page: 380 article-title: Biodiversity offsets in theory and practice publication-title: Oryx – volume: 38 start-page: 449 year: 2020 end-page: 463 article-title: Progressing green infrastructure planning: Understanding its scalar, temporal, geo‐spatial and disciplinary evolution publication-title: Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal – volume: 20 start-page: 171 year: 1989 end-page: 197 article-title: Landscape ecology: The effect of pattern and process publication-title: Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics – volume: 748 year: 2020 article-title: Green infrastructure through the lens of ‘one health’: A systematic review and integrative framework uncovering synergies and trade‐offs between mental health and wildlife support in cities publication-title: Science of the Total Environment – volume: 172 start-page: 65 year: 2014 end-page: 71 article-title: Optimizing agri‐environment schemes for biodiversity, ecosystem services or both? publication-title: Biological Conservation – volume: 63 start-page: 1791 issue: 10 year: 2020 end-page: 1810 article-title: Biocultural learning–beyond ecological knowledge transfer publication-title: Journal of Environmental Planning and Management – volume: 55 start-page: 2537 issue: 6 year: 2018 end-page: 2543 article-title: Defining and delivering resilient ecological networks: Nature conservation in England publication-title: Journal of Applied Ecology – volume: 22 start-page: 1 issue: 1 year: 2011 end-page: 29 article-title: An integrative framework for collaborative governance publication-title: Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory – volume: 32 start-page: 389 year: 2003 end-page: 396 article-title: Reserves, resilience and dynamic landscapes publication-title: Ambio – start-page: 23 year: 2017 end-page: 52 – year: 2019 – volume: 29 start-page: 213 year: 2018 end-page: 222 article-title: Adoption of the ecosystem services concept in EU policies publication-title: Ecosystem Services – year: 2015 – volume: 23 start-page: 1297 issue: 6 year: 2013 end-page: 1310 article-title: Management trade‐offs between aboveground carbon storage and understory plant species richness in in temperate forests publication-title: Ecological Applications – volume: 214 year: 2021 article-title: A ‘green’ chameleon: Exploring the many disciplinary definitions, goals, and forms of “green infrastructure” publication-title: Landscape and Urban Planning – volume: 8 start-page: 319 issue: 3 year: 2020 end-page: 335 article-title: What is policy assemblage? publication-title: Territory, Politics, Governance – volume: 98 start-page: 214 year: 2019 end-page: 225 article-title: Cutting nature to fit: Urbanization, neoliberalism and biodiversity offsetting in England publication-title: Geoforum – year: 2000 – volume: 3 year: 2016 article-title: Sparing land for biodiversity at multiple spatial scales publication-title: Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution – volume: 71 start-page: 9 year: 2020 end-page: 18 article-title: Biologia futura: Landscape perspectives on farmland biodiversity conservation publication-title: Biologia Futura – volume: 309 start-page: 570 issue: 5734 year: 2005 end-page: 574 article-title: Global consequences of land use publication-title: Science – year: 2016 – volume: 192 start-page: 533 year: 2015 end-page: 540 article-title: Biodiversity offsetting as a commodification process: A French case study as a concrete example publication-title: Biological Conservation – year: 1977 – year: 1992 – volume: 11 start-page: 16 issue: 2 year: 2006 article-title: Scale mismatches in management of urban landscapes publication-title: Ecology and Society – year: 2015a – year: 2010 – year: 2012 – volume: 15 start-page: 1133 year: 2015 end-page: 1143 article-title: The practice of settling and enacting strategic guidelines for climate adaptation in spatial planning: Lessons from ten Swedish municipalities publication-title: Regional Environmental Change – volume: 43 start-page: 516 year: 2014 end-page: 529 article-title: From multifunctionality to multiple ecosystem services? A conceptual framework for multifunctionality in Green infrastructure planning for urban areas publication-title: Ambio – volume: 24 start-page: 1253 issue: 9 year: 2017 end-page: 1268 article-title: Moving beyond legal compliance: Innovative approaches to EU multilevel implementation publication-title: Journal of European Public Policy – volume: 16 start-page: 1003 year: 2011 end-page: 1019 article-title: Understanding green infrastructure: The development of a contested concept in England publication-title: Local Environment – year: 2006 – volume: 20 start-page: 152 year: 2022 end-page: 160 article-title: What is green infrastructure? A study of definitions in US city planning publication-title: Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment – volume: 8 issue: 4 year: 2019 article-title: Implementing Green infrastructure in spatial planning in Europe publication-title: Land – volume: 17 start-page: 112 issue: 2 year: 2009 end-page: 122 article-title: Habitat banking—How it could work in the UK publication-title: Journal for Nature Conservation – volume: 10 start-page: 139 year: 2017 end-page: 145 article-title: Embedding evidence on conservation interventions within a context of multi‐level governance publication-title: Conservation Letters – start-page: 46 year: 1996 end-page: 68 – volume: 9 start-page: 299 year: 2007 end-page: 314 article-title: Who is in charge here? Governance for sustainable development in a complex world publication-title: Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning – year: 2009a – year: 2017 – volume: 221 start-page: 86 year: 2018 end-page: 90 article-title: Policy flaws of biological offsetting as a conservation strategy publication-title: Biological Conservation – volume: 33 start-page: 223 year: 2015 end-page: 228 article-title: Interrogating networks: Towards an agnostic perspective on governance research publication-title: Environmental and Planning C: Government and Policy – volume: 87 start-page: 73 year: 2017 end-page: 84 article-title: Translating bioenergy policy in Europe: Mutation, aims and boosterism in EU energy governance publication-title: Geoforum – year: 2015b – volume: 10 start-page: 325 issue: 3 year: 2012 end-page: 332 article-title: Policy assemblages, mobilities, and mutations: Toward a multidisciplinary conservation publication-title: Political Studies Review – year: 2013 – year: 1999 – ident: e_1_2_9_28_1 doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2014.02.013 – volume-title: Metapopulation ecology year: 1999 ident: e_1_2_9_55_1 doi: 10.1093/oso/9780198540663.001.0001 contributor: fullname: Hanski I. – volume-title: En sammanhållen klimat‐ och energipolitik year: 2009 ident: e_1_2_9_44_1 contributor: fullname: Governmental Bill – volume-title: Uppdrag till Naturvårdsverket att utarbeta en landskapsanalys och analysera relevanta styrmedel för att utveckla den gröna infrastrukturen year: 2012 ident: e_1_2_9_47_1 contributor: fullname: Governmental Commission – ident: e_1_2_9_68_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1478‐9302.2012.00276.x – volume-title: The economics of biodiversity: The Dasgupta review year: 2021 ident: e_1_2_9_21_1 contributor: fullname: Dasgupta P. – ident: e_1_2_9_14_1 doi: 10.1016/j.jnc.2008.12.006 – ident: e_1_2_9_59_1 doi: 10.1111/1365‐2664.13196 – ident: e_1_2_9_3_1 doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103838 – ident: e_1_2_9_67_1 doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2021.104145 – volume-title: Actors' roles and perceptions on the opportunities to increase nature conservation effectiveness: A study of interaction between knowledge and policy process year: 2017 ident: e_1_2_9_77_1 contributor: fullname: Salomaa A. – ident: e_1_2_9_20_1 – volume-title: Green infrastructure (GI) – Enhancing Europe's' Natural Capital year: 2013 ident: e_1_2_9_36_1 contributor: fullname: European Commission – ident: e_1_2_9_56_1 doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.05.006 – ident: e_1_2_9_69_1 doi: 10.1080/15239080701631544 – ident: e_1_2_9_27_1 doi: 10.3389/fevo.2015.00145 – ident: e_1_2_9_70_1 doi: 10.1080/14615517.2019.1617517 – ident: e_1_2_9_51_1 doi: 10.1002/fee.2445 – ident: e_1_2_9_76_1 doi: 10.1111/gcb.14503 – ident: e_1_2_9_52_1 doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2018.03.001 – volume-title: Analysing policy: What's the problem represented to be? year: 2009 ident: e_1_2_9_5_1 contributor: fullname: Bacchi C. – volume-title: The road to dignity in 2030: Ending poverty, transforming all lives and protecting the planet. Synthesis report of the secretary‐general on the Post‐2015 sustainable development agenda year: 2014 ident: e_1_2_9_83_1 contributor: fullname: UN – ident: e_1_2_9_24_1 doi: 10.1111/j.0030-1299.2008.16215.x – volume-title: Uppdrag om att ta fram riktlinjer och en genomförandeplan avseende regionala handlingsplaner för grön infrastruktur year: 2014 ident: e_1_2_9_49_1 contributor: fullname: Governmental Commission – ident: e_1_2_9_73_1 doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2010.01.002 – volume-title: Discipline and punish year: 1977 ident: e_1_2_9_39_1 contributor: fullname: Foucault M. – volume-title: Mall för disposition av regionala handlingsplaner för grön infrastruktur year: 2017 ident: e_1_2_9_31_1 contributor: fullname: EPA – ident: e_1_2_9_2_1 doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.10.003 – ident: e_1_2_9_4_1 doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.05.013 – volume-title: Ekologisk kompensation: Upptag och integrering bland Svenska aktörer och kvantifiering av de samhällsekonomiska effekterna year: 2021 ident: e_1_2_9_72_1 contributor: fullname: Nordström J. – ident: e_1_2_9_32_1 doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.10.005 – volume-title: National board of housing building and planning year: 2015 ident: e_1_2_9_43_1 contributor: fullname: Governmental Appropriation Directions – ident: e_1_2_9_15_1 doi: 10.1017/S003060531200172X – ident: e_1_2_9_60_1 doi: 10.1111/ddi.12324 – ident: e_1_2_9_80_1 doi: 10.1007/s10113‐014‐0690‐0 – ident: e_1_2_9_7_1 doi: 10.1007/s42977‐020‐00015‐7 – ident: e_1_2_9_57_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1365‐2664.2010.01919.x – ident: e_1_2_9_13_1 doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.02.014 – ident: e_1_2_9_41_1 doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.04.003 – ident: e_1_2_9_54_1 doi: 10.1007/s13280‐014‐0510‐2 – ident: e_1_2_9_74_1 doi: 10.1177/0263774X15614726 – ident: e_1_2_9_82_1 doi: 10.1146/annurev.es.20.110189.001131 – ident: e_1_2_9_78_1 doi: 10.1080/21622671.2018.1559760 – volume-title: Our life insurance, our natural capital; an EU biodiversity strategy to 2020 year: 2011 ident: e_1_2_9_35_1 contributor: fullname: European Commission – volume-title: Green infrastructure: Linking landscapes and communities year: 2006 ident: e_1_2_9_8_1 contributor: fullname: Benedict M. A. – start-page: 46 volume-title: Constructing nature year: 1996 ident: e_1_2_9_33_1 contributor: fullname: Escobar A. – ident: e_1_2_9_22_1 doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2015.08.015 – ident: e_1_2_9_37_1 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141589 – volume-title: Riktlinjer för regionala handlingsplaner för grön infrastruktur year: 2015 ident: e_1_2_9_30_1 contributor: fullname: EPA – ident: e_1_2_9_10_1 doi: 10.1002/ecs2.2582 – ident: e_1_2_9_38_1 doi: 10.1126/science.1111772 – ident: e_1_2_9_75_1 doi: 10.1038/ncomms13106 – ident: e_1_2_9_29_1 doi: 10.1093/jopart/mur011 – ident: e_1_2_9_23_1 doi: 10.1068/c11292 – volume-title: County administrative boards year: 2015 ident: e_1_2_9_42_1 contributor: fullname: Governmental Appropriation Directions – ident: e_1_2_9_40_1 doi: 10.1080/09640568.2019.1688651 – ident: e_1_2_9_61_1 doi: 10.5771/9783845280639-23 – ident: e_1_2_9_26_1 doi: 10.1111/conl.12225 – ident: e_1_2_9_64_1 doi: 10.1177/0263774X15605939 – ident: e_1_2_9_65_1 doi: 10.1177/1078087407304689 – ident: e_1_2_9_81_1 doi: 10.1080/13501763.2017.1314541 – volume-title: White paper. Adapting to climate change: Towards a European framework for action year: 2009 ident: e_1_2_9_34_1 contributor: fullname: European Commission – ident: e_1_2_9_12_1 doi: 10.5751/ES-01819-110216 – ident: e_1_2_9_19_1 – ident: e_1_2_9_9_1 doi: 10.1579/0044‐7447‐32.6.389 – volume-title: Hållbart skydd av naturområden year: 2009 ident: e_1_2_9_45_1 contributor: fullname: Governmental Bill – volume-title: Uppdrag om förstudie om uppbyggandet av grön infrastruktur och framtagande av indikatorer för gynnsam bevarandestatus year: 2010 ident: e_1_2_9_46_1 contributor: fullname: Governmental Commission – ident: e_1_2_9_85_1 doi: 10.1080/13549839.2011.631993 – volume-title: Making space for nature: A review of England's wildlife sites and ecological networks year: 2010 ident: e_1_2_9_63_1 contributor: fullname: Lawton J. H. – ident: e_1_2_9_66_1 doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.11.001 – volume-title: Research methods in the social sciences year: 2005 ident: e_1_2_9_11_1 contributor: fullname: Blackmore J. – volume-title: On the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora year: 1992 ident: e_1_2_9_25_1 contributor: fullname: Directive 92/43/EEC. – ident: e_1_2_9_79_1 doi: 10.3390/land8040062 – ident: e_1_2_9_17_1 doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.05.008 – ident: e_1_2_9_84_1 doi: 10.1108/QRJ‐12‐2018‐0004 – ident: e_1_2_9_71_1 doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2015.01.011 – volume-title: Global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services of the intergovernmental science‐ policy platform on biodiversity and ecosystem services year: 2019 ident: e_1_2_9_58_1 contributor: fullname: IPBES – ident: e_1_2_9_6_1 doi: 10.1057/978-1-137-52546-8 – volume-title: Förordning om myndigheters klimatanpassningsarbete year: 2018 ident: e_1_2_9_50_1 contributor: fullname: Governmental Regulation – volume-title: “The Swedish administrative model”, The Oxford handbook of Swedish politics year: 2015 ident: e_1_2_9_53_1 contributor: fullname: Hall P. – ident: e_1_2_9_18_1 – ident: e_1_2_9_16_1 doi: 10.1890/12‐1472.1 – ident: e_1_2_9_62_1 doi: 10.1080/19460171.2013.784624 – volume-title: Uppdrag om framtagande av förslag till handlingsplan på regional nivå year: 2013 ident: e_1_2_9_48_1 contributor: fullname: Governmental Commission |
SSID | ssj0002013643 |
Score | 2.28805 |
Snippet | Green infrastructure (GI) is increasingly used in policymaking to promote biodiversity and enhance ecosystem services through the protection, creation,... Abstract Green infrastructure (GI) is increasingly used in policymaking to promote biodiversity and enhance ecosystem services through the protection,... |
SourceID | doaj swepub proquest crossref wiley |
SourceType | Open Website Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Publisher |
StartPage | 839 |
SubjectTerms | Biodiversity biodiversity conservation Biodiversity loss Biologi Biological Sciences Climate change Conservation Ecology Ecosystem services Ekologi environmental governance Green infrastructure Infrastructure Land conservation Land use multifunctional landscapes Natural Sciences Naturvetenskap Planning policy assemblage Political Science Samhällsvetenskap Social Sciences Statsvetenskap Wildlife conservation |
Title | The Swedish green infrastructure policy as a policy assemblage: What does it do for biodiversity conservation? |
URI | https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002%2Fpan3.10456 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2793865103 https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/fded67a8-32aa-499c-acf8-806f9db1d565 https://doaj.org/article/f21e276b26a5465b870aae25dbef65c1 |
Volume | 5 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://sdu.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Na9wwEB3anEqhtElK3aZBkJwCJrYky3IvJW025BQCSaE3oS-3KcnuErOU_PvMSN7N7qW9BCwsjJGsmZH0JI3fABzG6FqLOL6sHVow4n9ZdrxWpesa0Ttndd3TVvb5VXvxU59OiCZnFeqLfMIyPXAW3HHP68hb5biyFLcbS6ysjbwJLvaq8XnhU6m1xdSfdLxWC5xrV3yk_Bj7lqADTYpUvTYDJaL-TXSZGUM3wWqabc7ewpsRJrKT_Hnv4EWcbsPrtagGDzswRRWzq7_0Y-1v9ov8Zxiay73NlLCL-8jmifSX2YHZp_wQ79wtjiJfGNF2szCLA7uhO0P8ytzNLCxdNZgnV-tx0_brLvw4m1x_Py_H8Amlly1XpUSoJ7yK1qLM2kZ52QRfRaW6XlpEBlFUXYi44ELE5oJVneyk69vQ4sUb78R72JrOpvEDsIpHLRvaMnVOaoElKKmD7qrgLJe2LuBgKVIzzywZJvMhc0OCN0nwBXwjaa_eIGbr9AD1bUZ9m__pu4C9pa7M2N0Gw3GU0YrIAQuYZP1t1HK7mGNymMyAVYQYFFqoEdxag0s-b6zvtdGV6rvg6oAgt4CjpP5_NMdcnlyIlPv4HA37BK8olH32CtqDLbSV-BleDmGxn2z7EeI2_iA |
link.rule.ids | 230,315,782,786,866,887,2106,27933,27934 |
linkProvider | Directory of Open Access Journals |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The+Swedish+green+infrastructure+policy+as+a+policy+assemblage%3A+What+does+it+do+for+biodiversity+conservation%3F&rft.jtitle=People+and+nature+%28Hoboken%2C+N.J.%29&rft.au=Post%2C+Maria&rft.au=Knagg%C3%A5rd%2C+%C3%85sa&rft.au=Alkan%C2%A0Olsson%2C+Johanna&rft.au=Olsson%2C+Ola&rft.date=2023-04-01&rft.issn=2575-8314&rft.eissn=2575-8314&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=839&rft.epage=851&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002%2Fpan3.10456&rft.externalDBID=10.1002%252Fpan3.10456&rft.externalDocID=PAN310456 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=2575-8314&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=2575-8314&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=2575-8314&client=summon |