DOES COGNITIVE CAPACITY INTERFERE WITH THE OUTCOME OF OBERLIN TRANSFER?
To determine the relationship between the functional outcome achieved following Oberlin transfer, the cognitive level of the patient, and the time elapsed between the trauma event and surgery. Eighteen patients with a traumatic injury to the brachial plexus (C5-C6 and C5-C7) were evaluated. Seventee...
Saved in:
Published in: | Acta ortopedica brasileira Vol. 26; no. 6; pp. 394 - 396 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Brazil
ATHA EDITORA
01-12-2018
Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | To determine the relationship between the functional outcome achieved following Oberlin transfer, the cognitive level of the patient, and the time elapsed between the trauma event and surgery.
Eighteen patients with a traumatic injury to the brachial plexus (C5-C6 and C5-C7) were evaluated. Seventeen (94.4%) patients were males and one (5.6%) was female, with a mean age of 29.5 years (range 17-46 years). We evaluated the active range of motion, elbow flexion strength, and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) and determined the correlation between the procedural outcome and the patient's cognitive level, as assessed by the Mini-Mental State Exam (MMSE).
We found statistically significant correlations between the MMSE scale and strength recovery (84.4%, p<0.001), which was classified as excellent, and between the MMSE and British Medical Research Council (BMRC) scales (78.4%, p>0.001), which classified cognitive level as good.
We found a positive correlation between cognitive capacity and functional outcome of patients submitted to Oberlin surgery. The time elapsed between trauma and the surgical procedure showed an inversely proportional correlation with the strength of recovery. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 All authors declare no potential conflict of interest related to this article. AUTHORS’ CONTRIBUTIONS: Each individual author contributed individually and significantly to the development of this work. FASAF (0000-0001-5963-7573)*: Conception and design; Data Collection; Analysis and interpretation; Statistical analysis; Discussion of results; Writing the article; Final approval of the article. TGO (0000-0001-8249-2659)*: Data Collection; Analysis and interpretation; Discussion of results; Writing the article; Final approval of the article. WZS (0000-0002-9100-4749)*: Data Collection; Analysis and interpretation; Discussion of results; Writing the article; Final approval of the article. YAA (0000-0003-0752-5128)*: Conception and design; Discussion of results; Writing the article; Final approval of the article. ACC (0000-0002-5039-8884)*: Conception and design; Discussion of results; Writing the article; Final approval of the article. PMMBF (0000-0001-7081-987X)*: Conception and design; Discussion of results; Writing the article; Final approval of the article. *ORCID (Open Researcher and Contributor ID). |
ISSN: | 1413-7852 1809-4406 1809-4406 |
DOI: | 10.1590/1413-785220182606196665 |