Religious attitudes towards living kidney donation among Dutch renal patients

• Published in: Medicine, health care, and philosophy Vol. 15; no. 2; pp. 221 - 227
• Main Authors: Ismail, Sohal Y., Massey, Emma K., Luchtenburg, Annemarie E., Claassens, Lily, Zuidema, Willij C., Busschbach, Jan J. v., Weimar, Willem
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Dordrecht Springer Netherlands 01-05-2012; Springer Nature B.V
• Subjects: Adult; Aged; Attitude; Attitudes; Bioethics; Blood & organ donations; Education; Ethics; Female; Focus groups; Humans; Inequality; Interviews; Interviews as Topic; Kidney; Kidney diseases; Kidney Failure, Chronic - ethnology; Kidney Failure, Chronic - psychology; Kidney Failure, Chronic - surgery; Kidney Transplantation - ethnology; Kidney Transplantation - psychology; Kidney transplants; Living Donors - psychology; Male; Medical Law; Middle Aged; Minority & ethnic groups; Mortality; Netherlands; Patients; Philosophy; Philosophy of Biology; Philosophy of Medicine; Qualitative research; Religion; Scientific Contribution; Theory of Medicine/Bioethics; Netherlands; Attitudes; Religion; Ethnicity; Organ donation; Communication; Kidney transplantation
• ISSN: 1386-7423; 1572-8633
• DOI: 10.1007/s11019-011-9326-z

Terminal kidney patients are faced with lower quality of life, restricted diets and higher morbidity and mortality rates while waiting for deceased donor kidney transplantation. Fortunately, living kidney donation has proven to be a better treatment alternative (e.g. in terms of waiting time and graft survival rates). We observed an inequality in the number of living kidney transplantations performed between the non-European and the European patients in our center. Such inequality has been also observed elsewhere in this field and it has been suggested that this inequality relates to, among other things, attitude differences towards donation based on religious beliefs. In this qualitative research we investigated whether religion might indeed (partly) be the explanation of the inequalities in living donor kidney transplants (LDKT) among non-European patients. Fifty patients participated in focus group discussions and in-depth interviews. The interviews were conducted following the focus group method and analyzed in line with Grounded Theory. The qualitative data analyses were performed in Atlas.ti. We found that religion is not perceived as an obstacle to living donation and that religion actually promotes helping and saving the life of a person. Issues such as integrity of the body were not seen as barriers to LDKT. We observed also that there are still uncertainties and a lack of awareness about the position of religion regarding living organ donation within communities, confusion due to varying interpretations of Holy Scriptures and misconceptions regarding the process of donation. Faith leaders play an important educational role and their opinion is influential. This study has identified modifiable factors which may contribute to the ethnic disparity in our living donation program. We argue that we need to strive for more clarity and awareness regarding the stance of religion on the issue of living donation in the local community. Faith leaders could be key figures in increasing awareness and alleviating uncertainty regarding living donation and transplantation.