Epidemiology of ankle and foot overuse injuries in sports: A systematic review

Studies regarding ankle and foot overuse injuries are quite diverse in research methodology, data reporting, and outcomes. The aims of this systematic review were to analyze the methodology of published studies regarding ankle and foot overuse injuries in different sports disciplines and to summariz...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports Vol. 23; no. 6; pp. 669 - 686
Main Authors: Sobhani, S., Dekker, R., Postema, K., Dijkstra, P. U.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Denmark Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01-12-2013
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Studies regarding ankle and foot overuse injuries are quite diverse in research methodology, data reporting, and outcomes. The aims of this systematic review were to analyze the methodology of published studies regarding ankle and foot overuse injuries in different sports disciplines and to summarize epidemiological data of ankle and foot overuse injuries. Four electronic databases, PubMed (MEDLINE), EMBASE, CINAHL, and SPORTDiscus® were systematically searched up to June 2011. A total of 89 articles on 23 sports disciplines were included in this review. Soccer, running, and gymnastics were the most frequently studied sports. Achilles tendinopathy, plantar fasciitis, and stress fracture were the most frequently studied injuries. Study design and reporting methods were heterogeneous. Most studies suffered from a weak methodology and poor reporting. The most common weaknesses were lack of a clear case definition, describing assessment procedures and reporting sample characteristics. Due to methodological heterogeneity of studies, inter‐sports and intra‐sports comparisons and meta‐analysis were not possible. Methodology of most studies on incidence and prevalence of ankle and foot overuse injuries is insufficient. Based on the results, we recommend authors to clearly define cases, describe assessment procedures and report sample characteristics adequately.
Bibliography:Supplementary file 1: Search strategy in four databases; Medline, Embase, CINAHL and SPORTDiscus.Supplementary file 2: Checklist to identify relevant information related to quality items.Supplementary file 3: Overview of characteristics of the 89 included studies.
ArticleID:SMS1509
istex:46855B0989FE15801B84D0E29D0BF621E3AD5AB4
ark:/67375/WNG-TGRNL5G3-V
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-4
ObjectType-Undefined-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Review-2
ObjectType-Article-3
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
ISSN:0905-7188
1600-0838
DOI:10.1111/j.1600-0838.2012.01509.x