A Systematic Review of Validated Measures of U.S.-Based Bystander Intervention-Related Constructs

• Published in: Trauma, Violence, & Abuse Vol. 24; no. 5; pp. 3732 - 3747
• Main Authors: Mennicke, Annelise, Montanaro, Erika, Bowling, Jessamyn, Tirunagari, Anvi, Williams, Madi, Jules, Bridget N., Campbell, Sydney, Carlson, Hannah, Farris, Shayna, McClare, Victoria, Kissler, Neha, McGonagle, Alyssa, Pruneda, Phoebe, Haley, Gabrielle, McMahon, Sarah, Correia, Christopher J., Meehan, Erin, Benson, J. Kevin, Willard, Jessica, Post, Abigail, McCabe, Sean, Coates, C. Austin, Sotiroff, Alexa
• Format: Book Review Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Los Angeles, CA SAGE Publications 01-12-2023; Sage Publications Ltd
• Subjects: Adult; Bullying; Crises; Female; Heterosexuality; Humans; Intention; Intervention; Measures; Mental health; Students - psychology; Substance abuse; Substance use; Systematic review; Universities; Young Adult; United States > US; intentions to intervene; bystander self-efficacy; bystander behavior; bystander intervention
• ISSN: 1524-8380; 1552-8324; 1552-8324
• DOI: 10.1177/15248380221137067

This review aimed to identify U.S.-based, construct-validated measures of bystander intervention. Following PRISMA-P guidelines, electronic databases were searched, and emails were solicited identifying 8,559 articles for title screening. Abstracts and full texts were double screened, resulting in 24 scales meeting inclusion criteria: (a) measured a bystander-related construct in a situation where there was a potential for actual or perceived imminent physical or emotional harm, (b) written in English, and (c) statistically validated on U.S. samples. Most scales addressed the domain of interpersonal violence (67%), with fewer relating to bias/bullying (8.2%), mental health crises (12.5%), and substance use (12.5%). Most scales (71%) assessed the “take action” step of the situational model. The modal construct represented was intent/willingness/likelihood to intervene (50%). The average number of items on a scale was 14, and most (79%) provided Likert-style response options. None of the validated scales assessing behavior first accounted for an opportunity. Sample sizes ranged from 163 to 3,397, with the modal setting from colleges. Overall, samples were young (21.8 years old), White (75%), women (64%), and heterosexual (89%). Results indicate the need to validate additional measures that capture the “interpreting the situation as problematic” step of the situational model. Scales also need to be validated using diverse samples, particularly within the mental health crisis domain. Across all domains, validated measures need to be developed that first account for an opportunity when measuring actual bystander behavior. The information gleaned can be used to assist researchers in selecting measures and guide future measure development.