Investigation into the annotation of protocol sequencing steps in the sequence read archive

• Published in: Gigascience Vol. 4; no. 1; p. 23
• Main Authors: Alnasir, Jamie, Shanahan, Hugh P
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States BioMed Central 09-05-2015
• Subjects: Computational Biology; Internet; User-Computer Interface; Enrichment; Ligation; Next-generation sequencing; Experiment; Metadata; Protocol; Annotation; Fragmentation
• ISSN: 2047-217X; 2047-217X
• DOI: 10.1186/s13742-015-0064-7

The workflow for the production of high-throughput sequencing data from nucleic acid samples is complex. There are a series of protocol steps to be followed in the preparation of samples for next-generation sequencing. The quantification of bias in a number of protocol steps, namely DNA fractionation, blunting, phosphorylation, adapter ligation and library enrichment, remains to be determined.
We examined the experimental metadata of the public repository Sequence Read Archive (SRA) in order to ascertain the level of annotation of important sequencing steps in submissions to the database. Using SQL relational database queries (using the SRAdb SQLite database generated by the Bioconductor consortium) to search for keywords commonly occurring in key preparatory protocol steps partitioned over studies, we found that 7.10%, 5.84% and 7.57% of all records (fragmentation, ligation and enrichment, respectively), had at least one keyword corresponding to one of the three protocol steps. Only 4.06% of all records, partitioned over studies, had keywords for all three steps in the protocol (5.58% of all SRA records).
The current level of annotation in the SRA inhibits systematic studies of bias due to these protocol steps. Downstream from this, meta-analyses and comparative studies based on these data will have a source of bias that cannot be quantified at present.