Efforts going to the dogs? Evaluating attempts to re-introduce endangered wild dogs in South Africa
1. We evaluated one of the most extensive efforts to date to re-introduce an endangered species: attempts to establish an actively managed meta-population of African wild dogs Lycaon pictus in South Africa. 2. Using an information-theoretic approach, known-fate modelling in program mark was employed...
Saved in:
Published in: | The Journal of applied ecology Vol. 45; no. 1; pp. 100 - 108 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Oxford, UK
Oxford, UK : Blackwell Publishing Ltd
01-02-2008
Blackwell Publishing Blackwell Publishing Ltd Blackwell Science |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | 1. We evaluated one of the most extensive efforts to date to re-introduce an endangered species: attempts to establish an actively managed meta-population of African wild dogs Lycaon pictus in South Africa. 2. Using an information-theoretic approach, known-fate modelling in program mark was employed to estimate the survival of re-introduced wild dogs and their offspring, and to model covariate effects relative to survival. Multiple a priori hypotheses on correlates of re-introduction success were tested (collated from extensive individual experiences) using different re-introduction attempts as natural quasi experiments. 3. Survival analyses revealed that the determinants of re-introduction success can be reduced to two factors relevant for management, suggesting that wild dog re-introductions should be attempted with socially integrated animals that are released into securely fenced areas, unless measures are implemented to mitigate human-related mortalities outside protected areas. 4. Synthesis and application. This study illustrates that monitoring and evaluation of conservation efforts, complimented with expert knowledge, forms the foundation of informed decision-making to underpin management recommendations with scientific evidence, particularly if the proposed actions are controversial. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2007.01357.x M. Gusset and S. J. Ryan share first authorship. |
ISSN: | 0021-8901 1365-2664 |
DOI: | 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2007.01357.x |