Is Community Relevance Enough? Civic and Science Identity Impact of Microbiology CUREs Focused on Community Environmental Justice

• Published in: Frontiers in microbiology Vol. 11; p. 578520
• Main Authors: Adkins-Jablonsky, Sarah J, Akscyn, Rob, Bennett, Brad C, Roberts, Qutia, Morris, J Jeffrey
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Switzerland Frontiers Media S.A 17-12-2020
• Subjects: civic engagement; community; course-based undergraduate research experience; Microbiology; microbiology laboratory education; science identity; civic engagement; microbiology laboratory education; science identity; course-based undergraduate research experience; community
• ISSN: 1664-302X; 1664-302X
• DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.578520

Course-based undergraduate research experiences (CUREs) often involve a component where the outcomes of student research are broadly relevant to outside stakeholders. We wanted to see if building courses around an environmental justice issue relevant to the local community would impact students' sense of civic engagement and appreciation of the relevance of scientific research to the community. In this quasi-experimental study, we assessed civic engagement and scientific identity gains (
= 98) using pre- and post-semester surveys and open-ended interview responses in three different CUREs taught simultaneously at three different universities. All three CURES were focused on an environmental heavy metal pollution issue predominantly affecting African-Americans in Birmingham, Alabama. While we found increases in students' sense of science efficacy and identity, our team was unable to detect meaningful changes in civic engagement levels, all of which were initially quite high. However, interviews suggested that students were motivated to do well in their research because the project was of interest to outside stakeholders. Our observations suggest that rather than directly influencing students' civic engagement, the "broadly relevant" component of our CUREs engaged their pre-existing high levels of engagement to increase their engagement with the material, possibly influencing gains in science efficacy and science identity. Our observations are consistent with broader community relevance being an important component of CURE success, but do not support our initial hypothesis that CURE participation would influence students' attitudes toward the civic importance of science.